Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

gyroscope

(1,443 posts)
Mon Apr 30, 2018, 11:32 PM Apr 2018

What I don't get about the WHCD

don't they vet the comedian's monologue or routine before they allow him or her to get on the stage? if so how could they complain about it afterwards if it was already approved? or did Wolf go entirely off script?

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MaryMagdaline

(6,853 posts)
1. I think they got a transcript. Maybe that's why
Mon Apr 30, 2018, 11:42 PM
Apr 2018

Huckabee was pouting all night. She knew what was coming. MW said on PBS today that SHS never smiled and never stood up to clap for recipients of the awards.

lame54

(35,284 posts)
2. This was the 4th Daily Show comedian they've booked...
Mon Apr 30, 2018, 11:53 PM
Apr 2018

How many times do you have to touch a hot stove

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
4. You do understand that the point is to honor the First Amendment?
Tue May 1, 2018, 12:56 AM
May 2018

"Hey, guys, let's have a dinner to celebrate the First Amendment, and make sure all of the speakers submit their comments in advance for approval."

Ummmmmmm.... no.
 

gyroscope

(1,443 posts)
5. So they let her say whatever she wanted
Tue May 1, 2018, 01:21 AM
May 2018

and now are crying about it?

free speech doesn't mean you can't vet for taste and appropriateness for the occasion.

 

EffieBlack

(14,249 posts)
7. It's not like they hired Jay Leno and he came out and did Michelle Wolf's routine
Tue May 1, 2018, 01:46 AM
May 2018

As she said, “you should have done some research.”

An organization I represented once hired a famous, very edgy comedian for a big event - I think they’d only seen him on network tv and hadn’t bothered to check out his standup. Well, he came out and was about as raunchy, blue and un-pc as he could be. Lots of people were horrified.

Someone asked me afterward, “Didn’t you find him offensive?” I sure did, I said. “Why didn’t you walk out?”

I said, “I would have, but I was laughing so hard, I couldn’t get my shoes back on.”

dalton99a

(81,443 posts)
6. I thought it was a dignified affair to honor scholarship winners
Tue May 1, 2018, 01:44 AM
May 2018


https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/04/sarah-huckabee-sanders-was-fair-game-for-michelle-wolfs-whcd-insults.html
After a few big-name journalists panned Michelle Wolf’s act at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner on Saturday night, the association that hosts the dinner published its own negative review of the comedian’s performance. In a statement that referred to Wolf only as “the entertainer,” White House Correspondents’ Association president Margaret Talev said Wolf’s monologue “was not in the spirit of [the dinner’s] mission … to offer a unifying message about our common commitment to a vigorous and free press while honoring civility, great reporting and scholarship winners.”

For anyone who has ever watched a WHCD monologue, this stated mission may come as a surprise. The WHCA invites comedians to its annual black-tie dinner to make fun of the president, other politicians, and the press, not to champion civil discourse or fete a teen who won a scholarship. At last year’s event, headliner Hasan Minhaj joked that Jeff Sessions loves the n-word, that Betsy DeVos collects the tears of children, and that Steve Bannon is a literal Nazi. If the WHCA was unhappy in 2017 to receive the plaudits of viewers who were pleased to see someone express all the things self-serious journalists won’t say, there was no statement issued to that effect.

The organization’s tradition of getting a comedian to roast the current administration is not new. Its capitulation to trumped-up charges of bias from right-wing trolls, however, is. Anyone who claims right-wingers will use Wolf’s monologue as a reason to rebuff the mainstream press is sadly deluded about the main reason why people mistrust journalists these days: Because facts are inconvenient to the self-serving narratives peddled by the GOP, which repeats ad nauseam, via Fox News and right-wing radio, that all other media outlets are telling lies.

There are good arguments to be made about the unseemliness of the WHCD in general—as a rule, journalists shouldn’t be palling around with the political leaders they cover. The idea of TV news anchors in black-tie chortling over their surf n’ turf about some president’s endearing flub can be even harder to stomach under an administration that has posed unprecedented threats to democracy, peace, and human dignity. Watching politicians and journalists abandon their fundamentally antagonistic relationship for a night to congratulate themselves for inheriting some ancient concept of a robust, thriving free press does more to degrade trust in the media than Wolf’s joke about Scott Pruitt ejaculating at the thought of a dying tree. ...

Atman

(31,464 posts)
9. They're getting great mileage out of this "scandal."
Tue May 1, 2018, 05:44 AM
May 2018

Think about it; they’re milking the “mean, intolerant lefties” meme on every tv, radio, and web site. Their based is fired up! This was gold for them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What I don't get about th...