Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat Happens to the Evidence if Trump Goes on a Firing Spree?
Backup options are likely already underway.
"Trump would have to fire many people to keep this evidence from the light of day. Hed have to start with firing some combination of Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, and maybe more. Whoever replaced them would in turn have to shut down the SDNY probe and the Mueller investigation. This would likely mean more firings. Keep in mind that Sessions has reportedly declined to recuse himself from the Michael Cohen investigation, and refused in testimony last month to state his recusal status. I have written that the decision by Rosenstein and Mueller to refer the case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York was a calculated risk, indicating that they wanted to spread the investigation to other prosecutors as a hedge in case Trump fired Mueller. In doing so, they appeared to be optimistic that Sessions wouldnt impede this investigation once it was back under his ambit at main DOJ.
If Sessions wont do this work, then Trump might find someone who will, just as Richard Nixon found Robert Bork to do the work of firing special prosecutor Archibald Cox. Trump has reportedly ordered Muellers firing once or twice already. This process would be messy, but conceivably, Trump would cite the rejected and wrong unitary executive theory as constitutional grounds to demand evidence be buried.
As Ive written before, the way out of this DOJ mess would be state prosecutors. Not only is it permissible for federal prosecutors to share evidence with state prosecutors; it is standard, especially in multi-jurisdiction organized crime cases. And frankly, this case has become an organized crime case. Keep in mind that Mueller was reportedly in close contact with New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman last August, around the time there was speculation Trump was planning to fire Mueller. And keep in mind that Schneiderman has filed more than 100 lawsuits against the Trump Organization and so has open investigations into Trumps various alleged frauds. And Schneiderman was already contemplating state prosecutions when he called for an important change in New York criminal procedural law around the issue of double jeopardy to make sure Trumps pardons wouldnt allow him to obstruct justice here, as I encouraged the state of New York to do in a Slate piece."
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/05/heres-what-happens-to-the-mueller-evidence-if-trump-goes-on-a-firing-spree.html
Dead man switch hopefully ready to go.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1190 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Happens to the Evidence if Trump Goes on a Firing Spree? (Original Post)
orangecrush
May 2018
OP
Mueller is taking care to disperse evidence instead of keeping it all in his office...
Hekate
May 2018
#3
Members of the Watergate prosecution team took files out of their offices.
The Velveteen Ocelot
May 2018
#4
unblock
(52,183 posts)1. any key firings would only lead to a call for another special prosecutor.
to investigate not only the old stuff but also the firings as further obstruction.
republicans could block it, but i'm not thinking they really want to be overly complicit at this stage.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)2. It generates more evidence
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,661 posts)5. Like turtles, it's special prosecutors all the way down.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)6. Because the only thing better than lawyers is....
MORE LAWYERS!
Hekate
(90,627 posts)3. Mueller is taking care to disperse evidence instead of keeping it all in his office...
Just as Obama and Biden did. In the long run, the truth will out.
In the short run, hang on to your seat belts.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,661 posts)4. Members of the Watergate prosecution team took files out of their offices.
A couple of the Watergate veterans like Jill Wine Banks and Nick Ackerman have talked about this. When the Saturday Night Massacre hit, they knew they'd need to safeguard the files before Nixon's goons got to them. I'm sure Mueller also has some kind of a dead-man's switch all set up.
orangecrush
(19,511 posts)7. fingers crossed.