Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(57,612 posts)
Fri May 18, 2018, 09:02 PM May 2018

NYT: Informant was American academic who teaches in Britain.

WASHINGTON — President Trump accused the F.B.I. on Friday, without evidence, of sending a spy to secretly infiltrate his 2016 campaign “for political purposes” even before the bureau had any inkling of the “phony Russia hoax.”

In fact, F.B.I. agents sent an informant to talk to two campaign advisers only after they received evidence that the pair had suspicious contacts linked to Russia during the campaign. The informant, an American academic who teaches in Britain, made contact late that summer with one campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, according to people familiar with the matter. He also met repeatedly in the ensuing months with the other aide, Carter Page, who was also under F.B.I. scrutiny for his ties to Russia.

The role of the informant is at the heart of the newest battle between top law enforcement officials and Mr. Trump’s congressional allies over the F.B.I.’s most politically charged investigations in decades. The lawmakers, who say they are concerned that federal investigators are abusing their authorities, have demanded documents from the Justice Department about the informant.

Law enforcement officials have refused, saying that handing over the documents would imperil both the source’s anonymity and safety. The New York Times has learned the source’s identity but typically does not name informants to preserve their safety.


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/us/politics/trump-fbi-informant-russia-investigation.html?action=Click&contentCollection=BreakingNews&contentID=67000322&pgtype=Homepage

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT: Informant was American academic who teaches in Britain. (Original Post) RandySF May 2018 OP
The NY Times know who it is and he doesn't underpants May 2018 #1
" an American academic who teaches in Britain" marylandblue May 2018 #2
Yes manor321 May 2018 #4
Wow. There was talk about this last night. Ronan Farrow's name came up Wwcd May 2018 #5
I thought the same. Why did the nytimes do this?? damn. riversedge May 2018 #7
I totally agree marylandblue Uncle Joe May 2018 #10
Given the number of people Russia has killed in the UK in the past few years RockRaven May 2018 #3
Hey, If You or I Were Meeting With Russians Known to the IC Ccarmona May 2018 #6
Was It Necessary To Give So Much Info Me. May 2018 #8
witness protection. mopinko May 2018 #9
I am sure he is under MI5 or MI6 protection. roamer65 May 2018 #11
His name and bio are on twitter now. I do hope he has protection. NightWatcher May 2018 #12
From my twitter feed Gothmog May 2018 #13

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
2. " an American academic who teaches in Britain"
Fri May 18, 2018, 09:08 PM
May 2018

And met repeatedly with Carter Page?

Did they just out the informant? There are only so many American academics in Britain and how many of those would know Carter Page?

 

Wwcd

(6,288 posts)
5. Wow. There was talk about this last night. Ronan Farrow's name came up
Fri May 18, 2018, 09:37 PM
May 2018

Was Farrow talking about this informant to the MSM?
I didn't see his interview but this was the story they were concerned about.

If the Informant's identity was being held secure as a witness, by the FBI & Mueller, then Farrow or someone else outing who this person was, & saying they knew the source could certainly be a more serious situation.

Journalists can go to prisin for refusing to name their source IF they are brought under oath by DOJ to reveal the name.

Wasn't a journalist in this situation for not revealing who outed CIA Agent Valerie Plame?
I didn't follow that closely at the time so correct me if I'm wrong.

I'm just trying to lend a discussion as to Farrow's revealing info from a source who may be under protection by Mueller's investigation.

Having Trump's Attorney's in a position to demand to know the source now, may put Farrow, or whomever revealed the info, in a position of having to answer under oath who the source of that info is, either give up the sources name or face prison.

If he gives up the source's name it could then jeopardize Mueller's investigation, esp if the source is a protected witness.

It would let Trump's attorneys know what Mueller has on them as far as this witness goes.

The conversation I read last night about this had people yelling at Farrow to STOP TALKING...YOU CAN'T REVEAL THAT ..because it puts Farrow in a tough spot.

I cannot locate the tweet thread where I read this, so if anyone has any info about this..please post it.

Thanks..

RockRaven

(14,782 posts)
3. Given the number of people Russia has killed in the UK in the past few years
Fri May 18, 2018, 09:23 PM
May 2018

this constitutes a brazen publicly conducted de facto if not de jure conspiracy to attempt murder by Trump/Nunes/et al.

The media ought to be reporting it as such.

 

Ccarmona

(1,180 posts)
6. Hey, If You or I Were Meeting With Russians Known to the IC
Fri May 18, 2018, 09:38 PM
May 2018

We’d get a visit from the FBI, too. The Agent May or may not identify herself (or himself) to any of us, either.

Me.

(35,454 posts)
8. Was It Necessary To Give So Much Info
Fri May 18, 2018, 10:11 PM
May 2018

just for a scoop? Do they think people won't be able to figure it out and then, wanting their own scoop, publish the name?

mopinko

(69,804 posts)
9. witness protection.
Fri May 18, 2018, 10:44 PM
May 2018

there was talk that the fbi was being pro-active about this witness. i suspect that means they have been moving people to witness protection.

roamer65

(36,739 posts)
11. I am sure he is under MI5 or MI6 protection.
Fri May 18, 2018, 11:17 PM
May 2018

He would be a known asset to British Intelligence and they will step in to protect him.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT: Informant was Americ...