Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
Thu May 24, 2018, 06:36 PM May 2018

N.F.L. Adds First Amendment to List of Banned Substances

https://media.newyorker.com/photos/5b05f95e81dbdd4b5895f550/master/w_1023,c_limit/Borowitz-NFLFreeSpeech.jpg

NEW YORK (The Borowitz Report)—The National Football League has expanded its list of banned substances to include the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, the league confirmed on Wednesday.

Although the N.F.L. has long banned substances such as anabolic steroids and growth hormones, the First Amendment is believed to be the only right guaranteed by the Constitution to be included on the list.

Roger Goodell, the commissioner of the National Football League, said that, by adding the First Amendment to the list of banned substances, the N.F.L was establishing a “policy of zero tolerance on tolerance.”

In order to enforce the ban, Goodell said that players would be tested periodically to determine whether they had used words, gestures, or facial expressions that are strictly prohibited under the new rule.

Speaking at the White House, Donald Trump applauded the league for banning the approximately seventeen hundred N.F.L. players from exercising freedom of speech, and expressed hope that the ban could eventually be expanded to include the other three hundred and twenty-five million Americans.


https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/nfl-adds-first-amendment-to-list-of-banned-substances
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
N.F.L. Adds First Amendment to List of Banned Substances (Original Post) ehrnst May 2018 OP
Don't like the ruling, but a bunch of players staying off field still sends a strong message. Hoyt May 2018 #1
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
1. Don't like the ruling, but a bunch of players staying off field still sends a strong message.
Thu May 24, 2018, 07:38 PM
May 2018

Maybe not as good as kneeling or raising a fist, but -- assuming the wimpy TV broadcast chooses to show them -- a bunch of players running onto the filed AFTER the Anthem, is still strong.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»N.F.L. Adds First Amendme...