General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHas anyone seen Nunes rush to the mic or to the White House after he attended the FBI briefing??
@devinNunes did not race to the @WhiteHouse to snitch to @realdonaldTrump either.
Josh Campbell
?Verified account @joshscampbell
21h21 hours ago
I rarely offer predictions, but you can bet your rubles we likely wont see Chairman Nunes walk out of DOJ to a bank of microphones, apologize and praise the FBI for its hard work in attempting to stop a hostile foreign government from undermining our democracy.
@joshscampbell
We dont know what happened inside todays DOJ meeting, but I think we can rule out any big revelation that the FBI acted inappropriately. And the reason we know this is because Chairman Nunes didnt trip over his colleagues racing to the cameras to tell us about it.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
manor321
(3,344 posts)Yeah, they've all been very quiet.
kentuck
(111,053 posts)He is complicit in an obstruction of a legal and legitimate investigation.
PubliusEnigma
(1,583 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)"Why Is Devin Nunes So Quiet?" It's an influential wired-in conservative paper.
https://www.weeklystandard.com/andrew-egger/after-the-white-house-briefing-with-the-department-of-justice-devin-nunes-is-quiet
kentuck
(111,053 posts)That is one thing the trump cannot afford to happen.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)not only show us what they're saying about events now but their evaluations of the right without a "what's wrong with our conservative enemies" slant. Lots of what's wrong with liberals, of course, where protective regulations are swept into a giant "swamp" that turns out to be full of precious discards, but not to be mistaken with what Fox has become.
riversedge
(70,093 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)the real right really saying, not the "conservatives want to eat babies" stuff.
From another article,
...As important as it is, the CRA doesnt command media attention, much less public acclaim. It was enacted in 1996 when Newt Gingrich was House speaker. And until January 2017, when Republicans achieved a Washington trifectacontrol of the White House, Senate, and Houseit had been invoked successfully only once. That was in 2001 when it ended the life of the Labor Departments oppressive ergonomics policy.
But the CRA hasnt been forgotten. Republicans tried five times to eliminate Obama regulations, including the Environmental Protection Agencys Waters of the United States policy extending federal regulation of wetlands to vast new chunks of America. President Obama vetoed all five.
As the 2016 election approached, Republicans had no plans for reviving the CRA. They were expecting Hillary Clinton to win. That would have entrenched the massive regulatory machinery imposed by Obama. The swamp would be bigger than ever.
The day after Trump won, House and Senate Republicans, mainly aides of Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell and House speaker Paul Ryan, began conspiring with Trump aides. The CRA was now on the agenda, right near the top. And there were plenty of regulations to target.
How does it work? The CRA allows Congress to look back at regulations adopted in the dying days of a presidents tenure and, if it so chooses, vote them down. In effect, this requires one party to be in control. And they better be Republicans. Democrats adore regulation. ...
https://www.weeklystandard.com/fred-barnes/congressional-republicans-secret-weapon
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)conspiracy bullshit so I figure that Nunes and the other GOPs will follow suit.
C_U_L8R
(44,992 posts)and then he made a quick dash for the restroom