Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,093 posts)
Fri May 25, 2018, 09:09 AM May 2018

Has anyone seen Nunes rush to the mic or to the White House after he attended the FBI briefing??

@devinNunes did not race to the @WhiteHouse to snitch to @realdonaldTrump either.




Josh Campbell
?Verified account @joshscampbell
21h21 hours ago

I rarely offer predictions, but you can bet your rubles we likely won’t see Chairman Nunes walk out of DOJ to a bank of microphones, apologize and praise the FBI for its hard work in attempting to stop a hostile foreign government from undermining our democracy.


@joshscampbell

We don’t know what happened inside today’s DOJ meeting, but I think we can rule out any big revelation that the FBI acted inappropriately. And the reason we know this is because Chairman Nunes didn’t trip over his colleagues racing to the cameras to tell us about it.














11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Has anyone seen Nunes rush to the mic or to the White House after he attended the FBI briefing?? (Original Post) riversedge May 2018 OP
Quiet manor321 May 2018 #1
He may be looking for an attorney today? kentuck May 2018 #2
Schiff said none of their lies were proven out. They got nothing! PubliusEnigma May 2018 #3
DC's The Weekly Standard's last word is an article, Hortensis May 2018 #4
Wow! Even the conservatives at Weekly Standard are asking questions! kentuck May 2018 #6
Yes. Cons discussing cons from "inside" the right Hortensis May 2018 #9
I just saw that a few minutes ago on twitter, so posted it in GD. riversedge May 2018 #7
Good. We should be looking more at what the right is saying, Hortensis May 2018 #10
Well t-rump is attacking Democrats with Iliyah May 2018 #5
His actual quote was 'welp!' C_U_L8R May 2018 #8
Expect drumph to claim the meeting was fake. BSdetect May 2018 #11

kentuck

(111,053 posts)
2. He may be looking for an attorney today?
Fri May 25, 2018, 09:12 AM
May 2018

He is complicit in an obstruction of a legal and legitimate investigation.

kentuck

(111,053 posts)
6. Wow! Even the conservatives at Weekly Standard are asking questions!
Fri May 25, 2018, 09:26 AM
May 2018

That is one thing the trump cannot afford to happen.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
9. Yes. Cons discussing cons from "inside" the right
Fri May 25, 2018, 10:58 AM
May 2018

not only show us what they're saying about events now but their evaluations of the right without a "what's wrong with our conservative enemies" slant. Lots of what's wrong with liberals, of course, where protective regulations are swept into a giant "swamp" that turns out to be full of precious discards, but not to be mistaken with what Fox has become.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
10. Good. We should be looking more at what the right is saying,
Fri May 25, 2018, 11:04 AM
May 2018

the real right really saying, not the "conservatives want to eat babies" stuff.



From another article,

"Congressional Republicans Secret Weapon"

...As important as it is, the CRA doesn’t command media attention, much less public acclaim. It was enacted in 1996 when Newt Gingrich was House speaker. And until January 2017, when Republicans achieved a Washington trifecta—control of the White House, Senate, and House—it had been invoked successfully only once. That was in 2001 when it ended the life of the Labor Department’s oppressive ergonomics policy.

But the CRA hasn’t been forgotten. Republicans tried five times to eliminate Obama regulations, including the Environmental Protection Agency’s “Waters of the United States” policy extending federal regulation of wetlands to vast new chunks of America. President Obama vetoed all five.

As the 2016 election approached, Republicans had no plans for reviving the CRA. They were expecting Hillary Clinton to win. That would have entrenched the massive regulatory machinery imposed by Obama. The swamp would be bigger than ever.

The day after Trump won, House and Senate Republicans, mainly aides of Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell and House speaker Paul Ryan, began conspiring with Trump aides. The CRA was now on the agenda, right near the top. And there were plenty of regulations to target.

How does it work? The CRA allows Congress to look back at regulations adopted in the dying days of a president’s tenure and, if it so chooses, vote them down. In effect, this requires one party to be in control. And they better be Republicans. Democrats adore regulation. ...

https://www.weeklystandard.com/fred-barnes/congressional-republicans-secret-weapon

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
5. Well t-rump is attacking Democrats with
Fri May 25, 2018, 09:21 AM
May 2018

conspiracy bullshit so I figure that Nunes and the other GOPs will follow suit.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has anyone seen Nunes rus...