Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,729 posts)
Fri May 25, 2018, 02:26 PM May 2018

Pruitt spent $3.5 million on security during first year as EPA head

Scott Pruitt spent nearly $3.5 million on security during his first year as the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), according to an agency breakdown released Friday.

Pruitt's round the clock security detail racked up the high costs through both travel and payroll expenses — costing taxpayers more than $760,000 in travel and more than $2.7 million in pay during the administrator's first year.

The costs for his detail, which have accompanied Pruitt on both international trips like Morocco and Italy and to Disneyland and the Rose Bowl, are significantly higher than the amounts previous administrators spent, the data shows.

In comparison, EPA spent just $1.6 million on security for former EPA head Gina McCarthy during her last year in the post.

http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/389385-pruitt-spent-35-million-on-security-during-first-year-as-epa-head

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pruitt spent $3.5 million on security during first year as EPA head (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2018 OP
Why isn't he fired yet? BigmanPigman May 2018 #1
Again......imagine if Obama's EPA chief did this!!!! nt USALiberal May 2018 #2
Hell if he didn't have all that security detail around him, no one would know who the hell he was in politicaljunkie41910 May 2018 #3
That tax money could have funded another golf outing for Dirty Donny* Achilleaze May 2018 #4

politicaljunkie41910

(3,335 posts)
3. Hell if he didn't have all that security detail around him, no one would know who the hell he was in
Fri May 25, 2018, 03:27 PM
May 2018

the first place and then he wouldn't need any security detail, at all. He looks like any ordinary, white man from Oklahoma.
Question: When was the last time someone asked the EPA Director for his autograph at Disneyland?
Answer: Never; and it wasn't because of his large security detail, either. It's because no one gives a damn about the EPA Director. No one goes to Disneyland hoping they might run into the EPA Director. Nor do they get on an airplane hoping they run into the EPA Director. This guy is too full of himself. From what I understand, the only people who gave him a hard time on an airplane, (which he claimed is why he flew First Class), was because they recognized him as the asshole who was spending all their taxpayer money on his large security detail, and they let him know it.

Pruitt reminds me of this joke from when I was a child. It went: People wouldn't worry so much about what other people thought about them if they knew how little they really cared. Scott Pruitt, we don't care about where you go as long as we taxpayers aren't paying for it in one way or another.

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)
4. That tax money could have funded another golf outing for Dirty Donny*
Fri May 25, 2018, 03:32 PM
May 2018

But instead of republicans squandering our hard-earned tax millions on yet another freaking frivolous golden, gourmet, luxury golf goof-off for Dirty Donny* the republicans squandered it on needless protection for another republican peckerhead. Go figure. I want my tax money back. Now.

* aka republican Draft-Dodger-in-Chief

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pruitt spent $3.5 million...