Sat Jun 23, 2018, 01:34 PM
pbmus (11,260 posts)
Weaponized Disinformation....Fox, Breitbart, Infowars, Sinclair, And many others
|
5 replies, 819 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
pbmus | Jun 2018 | OP |
shraby | Jun 2018 | #1 | |
moondust | Jun 2018 | #2 | |
Archae | Jun 2018 | #4 | |
Volaris | Jun 2018 | #5 | |
Trek4Truth | Jun 2018 | #3 |
Response to pbmus (Original post)
Sat Jun 23, 2018, 01:41 PM
shraby (21,946 posts)
1. By throwing real facts backed up by proof out there fast and furious. MSNBC has been doing
that along with debunking the right wing junk news.
|
Response to pbmus (Original post)
Sat Jun 23, 2018, 01:56 PM
moondust (16,563 posts)
2. Does the First Amendment allow
someone to deliberately mislead the public?
Should it? |
Response to moondust (Reply #2)
Sat Jun 23, 2018, 01:58 PM
Archae (42,399 posts)
4. Of course they can. Except for libel and slander.
And public figures need to prove malice if they are libeled or slandered.
|
Response to moondust (Reply #2)
Sat Jun 23, 2018, 02:48 PM
Volaris (8,461 posts)
5. Yes. But there's nothing that says you can't legally require calling a spade a spade.
I'd very much like to see a law that says that if you're gonna call it news (in any form), it cannot turn a monetary profit for the parent company. Pay hannity or rush their millions form the ad buys and the ratings or whatever, but the owning company cannot make a buck. And if NOT that, it has to be announced before and after every commercial break that this is ENTERTAINMENT ONLY.
3 strikes and you get your license pulled and fuck you very much. Rush and hannity and jones would be off the air in a month. |