Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 08:01 PM Jul 2018

Why the heck are we not celebrating Mexico's

first leftist President who will take office on Monday. I remember so well when he ran twice before against 2 corrupt right wing con jobs..He lost twice which really upset me.. (I'm not of Mexican descent) but when he ran the 1st time I think it was during The Bush first Term.. I was desperate for good news, thought he was gonna win and sadly he lost.. I have not followed Mexico's last 2 elections.. And then I wake up yesterday and I am reading that Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, was overwhelmingly elected President of Mexico..

Am I wrong to think this huge? This shit is spectacular! Here's the Skinny!

By the way I feel he'll have his way with our idiot in chief...They've already talked

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/world/new-mexico-leader-in-great-first-talk-with-trump/ar-AAzv9SQ

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why the heck are we not celebrating Mexico's (Original Post) busterbrown Jul 2018 OP
He's been pilloried in the US press as a left-wing populist like Hugo Chavez marylandblue Jul 2018 #1
I haven't seen that comparison, but I have seen him DonViejo Jul 2018 #3
It's a smear shanny Jul 2018 #16
Because of his lack of support for lgbt and women's rights JI7 Jul 2018 #2
Please post some info.. busterbrown Jul 2018 #4
Here's a link to one article Kaleva Jul 2018 #9
Here's another.. busterbrown Jul 2018 #35
I don't see how that addresses the concerns of those fighting for lgbt and women's rights Kaleva Jul 2018 #43
maybe we should see how he governs before we get all excited nt msongs Jul 2018 #5
Because most of us know little MineralMan Jul 2018 #6
It seems to me that Mexico is completely unhinged.. busterbrown Jul 2018 #8
For a brief moment. sheshe2 Jul 2018 #31
You are damn right. greytdemocrat Jul 2018 #11
As with others here, I don't know much at all bout this guy... Thomas Hurt Jul 2018 #7
Until just a few years ago there was real support on DU for Chavez and even Maduro GulfCoast66 Jul 2018 #10
NO. Populism does not equal Nationalism. eom shanny Jul 2018 #13
I politely disagree GulfCoast66 Jul 2018 #15
Bernie is a populist. shanny Jul 2018 #17
He's also an economic nationalist and isolationist radius777 Jul 2018 #18
not even going to dignify that with an argument shanny Jul 2018 #19
'Cause you can't...nt SidDithers Jul 2018 #38
I was going to say the thing. arthritisR_US Jul 2018 #40
Walked into that one didn't he/she. Good response GulfCoast66 Jul 2018 #21
*With* you! UTUSN Jul 2018 #22
Agree, especially since JFK, the party is less populist left radius777 Jul 2018 #26
I do not disagree at all. GulfCoast66 Jul 2018 #28
Kingfish, unfortunately, was 100% right, which is why I distrust populism Recursion Jul 2018 #36
I agree. Bernie is a populist GulfCoast66 Jul 2018 #24
Lol shanny Jul 2018 #27
I already have. You will find your answer in the last 8 or so post on this thread. GulfCoast66 Jul 2018 #30
Your apparent disdain for common people shanny Jul 2018 #33
Populism has nothing to do with lefty positions GulfCoast66 Jul 2018 #37
... SidDithers Jul 2018 #39
A couple recent threads I read implied he was the 'Bernie appalachiablue Jul 2018 #32
Around here, criticizing AMLO is considered an attack on "Populism" in the abstract. UTUSN Jul 2018 #25
I celebrated. Voltaire2 Jul 2018 #12
I celebrated too. shanny Jul 2018 #14
Not looking for (more) Flames UTUSN Jul 2018 #20
He doesn't take office on Monday. roamer65 Jul 2018 #23
This is just stupid on his part. Completely foregoing presidential security. roamer65 Jul 2018 #29
It's huge and I'm happy. Tatiana Jul 2018 #34
The fear is he will be a dictator. We shall have to see what happens. Demsrule86 Jul 2018 #41
Because it was nothing unexpected. NCTraveler Jul 2018 #42

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
1. He's been pilloried in the US press as a left-wing populist like Hugo Chavez
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 08:08 PM
Jul 2018

I don't know much about him, but I read so little positive that I suspect a targeted campaign against him. That's probably why a lot of people are not celebrating here. I just hope all the bad press is wrong.

 

shanny

(6,709 posts)
16. It's a smear
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 10:05 PM
Jul 2018

that requires believing tRump is actually a populist instead of just playing one on TV.

Kaleva

(36,294 posts)
9. Here's a link to one article
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 08:54 PM
Jul 2018

"He has also forged an electoral alliance with a socially conservative party founded by evangelical Christians, which could end up claiming 10% of the seats in Congress. "

"But Amlo’s positions on marriage equality and abortion have stirred disquiet among the LGBT community and women’s groups. "

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jun/27/mexico-election-candidates-avoid-stances-on-same-sex-marriage-and-abortion

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
6. Because most of us know little
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 08:40 PM
Jul 2018

about Mexican politics, and aren't that interested in learning. Heck, most of us know little enough about our own government, frankly...

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)
8. It seems to me that Mexico is completely unhinged..
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 08:47 PM
Jul 2018

Its frightening reading about the gangs, the corruption, crooked police the murders.. i realize that this is mostly in the impoverished areas.. but still its alarming!

What do you think? Sad that we know so little..

I was following Obrador a lot during his previous runs for presidency.. He seemed to be the real deal back then.

sheshe2

(83,729 posts)
31. For a brief moment.
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 12:18 AM
Jul 2018
Its frightening reading about the gangs, the corruption, crooked police the murders


I thought you were describing Trump and the cronies he hires...his connections to Putin and the entire GOP party. My bad.

Thomas Hurt

(13,903 posts)
7. As with others here, I don't know much at all bout this guy...
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 08:46 PM
Jul 2018

and I am going to wait and see....you can talk big about ending corruption.......just like the Pig.

If he does take it on in a serious way....well he better watch his back.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
10. Until just a few years ago there was real support on DU for Chavez and even Maduro
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 08:58 PM
Jul 2018

Leftist can be susceptible to demagoguery if it covers itself in language we understand.

Populism and Nationalism never ends well. Left or right. 2 peas in a pod.

Mexico’s new president? Get back with me in a year or so. Till then the jury is out.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
15. I politely disagree
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 10:04 PM
Jul 2018

Populist are nationalist in sheeps clothing.

And some our biggest populist have been awful. Wilson, Huey Long. I could add others.

FDRs most poisonous opponents were Democratic populists.

Name one populist who has added to civic virtue.

radius777

(3,635 posts)
18. He's also an economic nationalist and isolationist
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 10:27 PM
Jul 2018

like Trump, who also mythologizes the rural white working class.

Populism and nationalism are intertwined idelogies that are basically the same thing.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
21. Walked into that one didn't he/she. Good response
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 11:33 PM
Jul 2018

I can’t believe all these self described nationalist/populist/progressives who have not spent even 15 minutes studying the rather sordid 130 year old history of people who self identify as those terms.

Just call me a liberal.

My dad was a Southern FDR Democrat. Huey Long gave him all the progressive/populist bullshit he ever needed.

radius777

(3,635 posts)
26. Agree, especially since JFK, the party is less populist left
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 12:02 AM
Jul 2018

and more cosmopolitan left, in that it sees itself as part of a global context that values strong foreign alliances, wants trade as along it is fair trade, sees progress as a partnership between business/academia/institutions and social justice and labor reform movements. It values technology, infrastructure and the global village concept that works to inspire and bring people together.

JFK, Bill and Obama's presidencies all followed that same mold... it's basically what a modern-day Democrat is.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
28. I do not disagree at all.
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 12:08 AM
Jul 2018

But that is the party FDR built. JFK was just continuing his legacy. Only a man who had experienced the depression, CCC, WPA and the huge government effort to win WWII could dream of a man on the moon.


FDR, JFK, LBJ and hell, even Goldwater all gave short shrift to populist and nationalist. They recognize the dangers they presented.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
36. Kingfish, unfortunately, was 100% right, which is why I distrust populism
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 05:40 AM
Jul 2018

He said "If you could limit it to the white population, America would happily be the most advanced social democracy in the world". Yep.

Populism in the US is always white nationalism dressed up as class consciousness, and that leopard never changes it spots, no matter how well-intentioned it starts out.

 

shanny

(6,709 posts)
33. Your apparent disdain for common people
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 12:35 AM
Jul 2018

Last edited Thu Jul 5, 2018, 01:28 AM - Edit history (1)

is noted. Remember when Rahm Emanuel called leftie positions fucking retarded (very civil of him wouldn't you say?) and wondered who else they would vote for? The 8 million Obama-to-Trump voters had an answer. Listen, Liberal.

Buh-bye

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
37. Populism has nothing to do with lefty positions
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 06:35 AM
Jul 2018

Last edited Thu Jul 5, 2018, 09:27 AM - Edit history (1)

And you insinuating that populism lured millions from Obama to Trump makes my point because Obama was no populist. President Obama had no scapegoat short of bad republican policy. Populist always do. It can be Mexicans and NAFTA, Chinese and TPP, Blacks and Afirmitive Action. I could go on. Hell, it can be Millionaires and Billionaires.

Anytime a politician blames our problem any one group of people alarm bells should go off.


appalachiablue

(41,118 posts)
32. A couple recent threads I read implied he was the 'Bernie
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 12:22 AM
Jul 2018

Sanders' of Mexico after Greg Palast discussed his election on Thom Hartmann's program. I didn't see that.

The comments I saw weren't so favorable.

UTUSN

(70,679 posts)
25. Around here, criticizing AMLO is considered an attack on "Populism" in the abstract.
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 12:01 AM
Jul 2018

AMLO is an actual human who has a personality, a belief system, and a track record, did not pop out of nowhere as a poster child. Will somewhat disagree withyou that "the jury is out." I, with almost all DUers, knew what was coming down the pike with Shrub in 1999 and with SHITLER in '16 (although we didn't imagine SHITLER really taking power).

AMLO is not an abstraction.




 

shanny

(6,709 posts)
14. I celebrated too.
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 10:03 PM
Jul 2018

So did my Mexican friends. Wanna know why? Because nothing could be worse than the crap they have been subjected to. That may sound like a trumpist justification but it is not. AMLO is in fact a populist, he doesn't just play one on TV. Whether he can prevail against the headwinds is another question, but the people are behind him. We'll see.

UTUSN

(70,679 posts)
20. Not looking for (more) Flames
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 11:21 PM
Jul 2018

Last edited Thu Jul 5, 2018, 10:24 AM - Edit history (3)

First, to clear the ground, here's a Vox article for basic information: https://www.vox.com/world/2018/6/30/17514176/mexico-2018-president-electioen-lopez-obrador

More ground to clear: AMLO is *not* an abstraction. He is an actual entity of the human variety, with a personality, belief system (giving benefit of doubt), *AND* a decades long track record. He's not popping from nowhere.

And, coming from me (not from "U.S. media" ), criticism (or just evaluation) of him is NOT an attack on "Populism" or "Socialism" or other abstract ideology: It's a critique of HIM, the same as "attacks" on SHITLER. And I love all stripes of my DU/Democratic camaraderos, including the most idealistic (of which I am one).

AND, criticizing HIM is not calling him HITLER.

He's a charismatic, rabble rousing, christ-[Messiah]identifying fellow, who thinks he can rule and fix everything by himself, like SHITLER.

Perhaps he will fight some corruption; perhaps he will dole cash like Evita PERON; perhaps, even, his heart is in the right place.

*******RECAP of news of the past few days: His Sunday night's victory speech was impressive for its nobility, saying stuff like he will not be a despot, will not tax to the skies, wants to serve everybody, fine.

Anecdotal: I'm not a Phd of any sort (specifically, not in "Latin American" studies or whatever), but know some close friends in Mexico. I learned that unlike here, with the several/few-more political parties than here, they don't do one-party sworn loyalty from birth, are Cafeteria voters for picking and choosing which party is saying things more to their current liking. When Vicente FOX (great guy) brought his PAN party to the forefront, my friends (small, but prosperous middle class business owners) voted ecstatically for him, detesting the old PRI (70 yrs in power) and AMLO with equal disdain. They considered AMLO as a wild-eyed radical. My impression was (I'm sure I will be corrected) that FOX/PAN were business/"honest", Catholic oriented (I'm a Center-Left secular humanist, not business/Catholic - PRI was secular despite corruption). After him, CALDERON (PAN) seemed similarly educated, dignified, honest, but seemed like people just didn't like him. But AMLO continued to be (spit on the floor).

So imagine my surprise, when this time around, after PENA Nieto (PRI) redux, my middle class/ business friends were WILD ABOUT AMLO!1

In my gobsmack, I asked them how they could possibly go from one end of the spectrum to the other. They said that AMLO has "changed" and "LEARNED".

So more news lately: AMLO says he is going to spend 7.5 billions in his first year on unemployed youth and the elderly, fine. That this cash will come out of cuts in the government, "even if we are left shirtless." Fine.

He also dismissed bodyguards, saying that "the people will protect me." Fine, good luck. But it fits his martyr complex.

I'm sure I will be corrected flammably here.






Tatiana

(14,167 posts)
34. It's huge and I'm happy.
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 12:37 AM
Jul 2018

The country has been run by the PRI forever. Time for someone different.

Most importantly, he is strongly anti-Trump. We will be squeeze by our neighbors on either side, which will hopefully help us in overthrowing our own authoritarian tyrant.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
42. Because it was nothing unexpected.
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 07:42 AM
Jul 2018

And “populism” isn’t half as cool as people think.

I would rather work to put down the two wings of “populism” grabbing hold in this country.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why the heck are we not c...