General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRIP Steve Ditko
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/steve-ditko-dead-spider-man-creator-was-90-1125489those here who know who he was, know what a giant of the field he was.
A quirky, gentle man, who was also bit of a Ayn Randian nut.
For everyone else, he was the artist who co-created Spider-Man and Dr. Strange.
?auto=format%2Ccompress&w=650
Auggie
(31,156 posts)Sure you got the right one?
Blue_Adept
(6,397 posts)edhopper
(33,545 posts)this is from Spider-Man #33, perhaps the greatest sequence in the history of the book and Ditko's high point on the book.
Auggie
(31,156 posts)John Romita started penciling Spidey with issue #39, though he thought Ditko might return to the book and thus mimikced his style. According to Romita (from Wikipedia):
"People laugh when I say this, but I did not want to do Spider-Man. I wanted to stay on Daredevil. The only reason I did Spider-Man was because Stan asked me and I felt that I should help out, like a good soldier. I never really felt comfortable on Spider-Man for years. ...I felt obliged to [mimic] Ditko because ... I was convinced, in my own mind, that he was going to come back in two or three issues. ... I couldn't believe that a guy would walk away from a successful book that was the second-highest seller at Marvel. ... After six months, when I realized it wasn't temporary, I finally stopped trying to [mimic] Ditko. ...I was doing these nine-panel pages and the thin line, and I was doing Peter Parker without any bone structure just like Ditko was doing, I thought."
(Stan) Lee later commented that this transition in Romita's style actually worked out for the benefit of the series, as it gradually weaned readers off of the Ditko look while ultimately allowing Romita to work in the style he most excelled at.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Not to take anything away from Ditko -- a fabulous visualizer and story-teller. But the above explains why their styles were so similar for a while.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Romita_Sr.
Romita's Spider-Man became the House style for decades. Including when his son took over the book.
But Ditko remains the originator. Spider-Man was unlike any superhero.
Blue_Adept
(6,397 posts)He was instrumental in such a great range of villains for Spidey in the first couple of years, on par with Batman's rogues gallery.
edhopper
(33,545 posts)than Batman's who were mainly men in silly costumes.
Blue_Adept
(6,397 posts)Batman's rogues largely came out of the 40's with the influence of pulp storytelling and larger than life colorfulness. Spidey's villains came in the 60's with the push for more grounded characters with their backgrounds to humanize them as the heroes were as well.
Both have great characters that in the right hands, which we've seen in the decades since, can become even more than what they started as.
edhopper
(33,545 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,440 posts)edhopper
(33,545 posts)my OP mentions his devotion to Ayn Rand.
His individual work throughout the 70s to present is rife with objectivism.
His character The Question (the basis for Rorschach in The Watchmen) is full on Libertarian.
This does not diminish his art and contributions to the field.
Blue_Adept
(6,397 posts)in which these characters lived, keeping it from being a cookie cutter view.
Anon-C
(3,430 posts)...which was quintessential Ditko. RIP!
Blue_Adept
(6,397 posts)Steve Ditko is one of the original architects of the Marvel Universe, co-creating Spider-Man and Doctor Strange, as well as greats like Ted Kord and the Question for Charlton (later bought by DC).
But it all comes back to Spider-Man, one of the greatest superheroes of all time, who debuted 55 years ago today on August 10, 1962 in Amazing Fantasy #15.
In honor of the anniversary of Spidey's first appearance, we're looking back at the greatest characters created and co-created by the enigmatic and aloof Ditko.
Hawk and Dove is a fave of mine, though I was frustrated by Rob Liefield's interpretation because the artwork.
I love that his Squirrel Girl has taken on a new life in the modern audience.
So much of what he created has been built upon in so many awesome ways.