General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe people did not vote for him. The Electoral College voted for him.
The people, by almost 3 million votes, voted against him.
Chuck Grassley was on CNN earlier talking about how the people voted for Trump so he has all this power as the "President"... Bullshit!
RKP5637
(67,105 posts)DownFromTheMountain
(226 posts)That since we didn't make sure Detroit, parts of Wis., etc were not counted with clarity, we don't know exactly how much DT lost the popular vote...AND the votes for Bernie anyway, Stein, Johnson were also votes against Trump and make the total closer to a 10 million deficit...We Got The Numbers.
kentuck
(111,082 posts)We are not sure that Trump and the Russians did not steal the last election.
It looks more and more as if they did.
Crutchez_CuiBono
(7,725 posts)to get paid off for their votes it seemed like. They had a chance to do the right thing.
marybourg
(12,622 posts)to interpose itself between the occasional incompetent demagogue and the presidency. And it failed.
dubyadiprecession
(5,707 posts)And republicans lost two elections to the electoral college, the electoral college would be gone.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)mvymvy
(309 posts)The National Popular Vote bill is 64% of the way to guaranteeing the majority of Electoral College votes and the presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in the country, by changing state winner-take-all laws (not mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, but later enacted by 48 states), without changing anything in the Constitution, using the built-in method that the Constitution provides for states to make changes.
It simply requires enacting states with 270 electoral votes to award their electoral votes to the winner of the most national popular votes.
All voters would be valued equally in presidential elections, no matter where they live.