can someone please explain the point of order dispute in the strzok hearing?

[unblock]

it's awesome seeing 20 threads about how awesome this awesome thing is, but some of us aren't seeing it live and have no idea what's so awesome.

[MattP]

1. 5 minutes sure is a long tine

[unblock]

4. thanks for the clarification

[DemocratSinceBirth]

2. This is like professional wrestling.

[LuckyCharms]

3. Repubs bullying strzok into answering questions about the

investigation. Democrats calling bullshit.

[unblock]

5. i got that part. i mean, specifically, what's the point of order, what's the making up rules part?

[LuckyCharms]

7. A precedent was cited by the Democrats

which indicated that questions that would hamper an investigation should not be allowed and that Mr. Strozk was not obligated to answer the questions. That was the point of order I believe.

But don't ask me...I don't know exactly what a point of order is.

[unblock]

8. thanks -- finally a bit of actual information

[asiliveandbreathe]

6. Banging back....goodlatte and gowdy are an embarrassment to the

American people....Strzok..firing back..audience clapping..awesome.....subpoena Bannon?? - YES!!!!