Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DemocracyMouse

(2,275 posts)
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 06:49 PM Jul 2018

Socialism vs Capitalism? Really?

Last edited Sun Jul 22, 2018, 07:35 PM - Edit history (1)

I recommend that we abandon the "socialism vs capitalism" nonsense and call for a "PEOPLE's ECONOMY." It may help unify progressives and centrists.

Deeper still, Democrats should emphasize a "PEOPLE'S INFRASTRUCTURE" of public roads, education and healthcare, etc., to foster a "PEOPLE'S ECONOMY" of small, innovative businesses.

I'll bet five peaches no one here will find this sufficiently pithy to respond to... but I hope one or two thinks about the implications of socially responsible INFRASTRUCTURE as ECONOMICALLY GENERATIVE. It's a nested model of society with a democratically determined infrastructure at the center of a continuously emergent system. Wired Magazine meets The Nation. Biology meets economics.

I'd even hazard to coin a term, DEMOSTRUCTURE, to imply a democratically determined infrastructure.

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Socialism vs Capitalism? Really? (Original Post) DemocracyMouse Jul 2018 OP
You lost the argument when you used the phrase "People's". brooklynite Jul 2018 #1
You missed the concept DemocracyMouse Jul 2018 #10
You might want to edit that DFW Jul 2018 #15
Grape for being is what I need right now! Political language is stressful! DemocracyMouse Jul 2018 #29
I think if you use the term "people's" you might as well just call it socialism or communism The Genealogist Jul 2018 #2
Government of the people, by the people... nothing wrong with "people" DemocracyMouse Jul 2018 #30
But Trump gets to refer to "enemy of the people" whenever he likes. I get it. n/t Orsino Jul 2018 #32
So all these words, once basic and beautiful, are off limits? DemocracyMouse Jul 2018 #3
I think you are on the right track shanny Jul 2018 #5
You'd have to go back a way DFW Jul 2018 #19
Power to the people, right on! oberliner Jul 2018 #4
Thank you, Oberliner! DemocracyMouse Jul 2018 #6
It was quite a college experience oberliner Jul 2018 #7
Fear of socialism is how the Nazis came to power. docgee Jul 2018 #8
"Socialist" is part of the Nazi party's full name DFW Jul 2018 #12
Wow. Crack a history book. docgee Jul 2018 #21
I'm an unabashed socialist. johnp3907 Jul 2018 #9
Then help with the poetics and the modeling DemocracyMouse Jul 2018 #13
While I personally like "People's Economy", etc. I also get the objections to it. scarletwoman Jul 2018 #11
Citizenostructure? DemocracyMouse Jul 2018 #16
Why not Citizen-Centered infrastructure? nt scarletwoman Jul 2018 #18
That's too long for a bumper sticker TexasTowelie Jul 2018 #20
Yeah, we could call the US a People's Democratic Republic... Wounded Bear Jul 2018 #14
Please re-read my proposal DemocracyMouse Jul 2018 #17
The M$M is now pushing this capitalist-socialist split of the Dem party now. docgee Jul 2018 #22
My wife and I are 1%ers; are we part of the "people"? brooklynite Jul 2018 #23
Why are you doing their work for them? bitterross Jul 2018 #25
"People's ...." anything sounds too much like Communism/Socialism. bitterross Jul 2018 #24
Good grief.... can we use "citizens' infrastructure"? DemocracyMouse Jul 2018 #26
I get it. We can be pretty exasperating here. bitterross Jul 2018 #27
How about a Moral Economy? Ron Green Jul 2018 #28
Amen to that! DemocracyMouse Jul 2018 #31

brooklynite

(94,266 posts)
1. You lost the argument when you used the phrase "People's".
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 06:58 PM
Jul 2018

"People's Republic"

"People's Police"

Nothing in the current capitalist system prevents government investment in social and capital goods.

Nothing in your proposed system prevents small, innovative businesses from becoming big ones.

DemocracyMouse

(2,275 posts)
10. You missed the concept
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 07:33 PM
Jul 2018

A DEMOSTRUCTURE'S raison d'etre is to foster a system that encourages small business. Do you want to help list the components of a socially responsible demostructure?

NET NEUTRALITY
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
PUBLIC HEALTHCARE
PUBLIC EDUCATION
UNION AND WORKER-FRIENDLY REGULATION
TRUST-BUSTING
WOMEN'S, LGBTQ RIGHTS LEGISLATION
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
VOTING RIGHTS
CONSUMER PROTECTIONS FROM BANKS
etc, etc.,

DFW

(54,256 posts)
15. You might want to edit that
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 07:43 PM
Jul 2018

Raison d'être is a "reason for being"

Raisin d'être is "grape for being"

The Genealogist

(4,723 posts)
2. I think if you use the term "people's" you might as well just call it socialism or communism
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 07:05 PM
Jul 2018

A lot of people like the bits of socialism we have now. They just don't like the word.

DemocracyMouse

(2,275 posts)
3. So all these words, once basic and beautiful, are off limits?
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 07:14 PM
Jul 2018

LIBERAL
PEOPLE'S
SOCIALIST

Why not take the language back?

 

shanny

(6,709 posts)
5. I think you are on the right track
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 07:21 PM
Jul 2018

and that our country has been on the wrong one for far too long. Obscene income inequality should be proof enough of that for anyone.

DFW

(54,256 posts)
19. You'd have to go back a way
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 07:53 PM
Jul 2018

In Germany, where I now live, the eastern part, run by the SED (Socialist Unity Party) trained its People's Police (Volkspolizei) and its Volksarmee (people's army) to kill anyone trying to escape their little "realexisistierender Sozialismus (really esisting socialism)."

The people who lived there didn't find the last two words to be so beautiful, and the eastern European Socialists considered "liberal" to be just as much of a dirty word as today's Republicans do.

DemocracyMouse

(2,275 posts)
6. Thank you, Oberliner!
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 07:21 PM
Jul 2018

And I might add, great music program to go with Oberlin's progressive, even experimental politics.

DFW

(54,256 posts)
12. "Socialist" is part of the Nazi party's full name
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 07:40 PM
Jul 2018

NSDAP: National Socialist German Workers Party

docgee

(870 posts)
21. Wow. Crack a history book.
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 08:01 PM
Jul 2018

The German Workers Party is where the Nazis came from. They gained power by spreading fear of Marxism. They may have had socialist in their name, but the Nazis were as fascist as the come.

johnp3907

(3,729 posts)
9. I'm an unabashed socialist.
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 07:29 PM
Jul 2018

And an unabashed Democrat. And I’ll happily work with anyone seeking the same or similar goals, regardless of terminology.

DemocracyMouse

(2,275 posts)
13. Then help with the poetics and the modeling
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 07:42 PM
Jul 2018

Do you understand why "socialism" vs "capitalism" sticks mud in any effort towards progress? Many socialists, esp. dem socialists, are entirely supportive of small biz, but the public has no idea because of how the discussion is framed.

Also, the concept of a demostructure which I've proposed, places a democratically controlled infrastructure at the center of a hive of continuously emerging small business activity

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
11. While I personally like "People's Economy", etc. I also get the objections to it.
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 07:38 PM
Jul 2018

How about we look into using something like "Citizen-Led" and "Citizen-Centered" phrasing instead?

TexasTowelie

(111,841 posts)
20. That's too long for a bumper sticker
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 07:58 PM
Jul 2018

and too many syllables that will eventually be butchered into a phrase that would be ridiculed.

Wounded Bear

(58,573 posts)
14. Yeah, we could call the US a People's Democratic Republic...
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 07:43 PM
Jul 2018


The RWers steal all the good terms and ruin them.

docgee

(870 posts)
22. The M$M is now pushing this capitalist-socialist split of the Dem party now.
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 08:04 PM
Jul 2018

Are the Russian bots spreading it around also?

 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
25. Why are you doing their work for them?
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 09:35 PM
Jul 2018

The OP didn't say a word to disparage the 1% or suggest they are not part of the "people."

They way I read your post is you've taken offense to the OP for some reason. Also, the way your post is written it is certain to get responses. The issue I have is I the responses it will drive will be infighting and do the work of the right for them.

I don't get why you took offense to the OP in the first place?

 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
24. "People's ...." anything sounds too much like Communism/Socialism.
Sun Jul 22, 2018, 09:31 PM
Jul 2018

I completely agree we need some re-branding and fast.

Everything I can think of that uses the word "People's..." is socialist or communist. And I'm pretty much of the same age and background as the people in love with Trump and, more importantly, at lot of the independents who lean right. I just got the hell out of the South and got an education and life experience.

These come to mind first:

People's Republic of China
Democratic People's Republic of Korea

Just not a good word to use. I apologize for complaining without making a alternative suggestion. I will work on it.

 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
27. I get it. We can be pretty exasperating here.
Mon Jul 23, 2018, 12:19 AM
Jul 2018

Try not to get to frustrated. We can be frustrating here and beat a lot of dead horses.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Socialism vs Capitalism? ...