Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHas Anyone Thanked Putin For Counting Our Votes For Us In 2016?
Making sure all those online tabulators on computers running Windows Server 2000 were 100% correct?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 923 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Has Anyone Thanked Putin For Counting Our Votes For Us In 2016? (Original Post)
PaulX2
Jul 2018
OP
brooklynite
(94,493 posts)1. No evidence of vote tampering...
Influencing how people chose to vote is another matter...
brush
(53,764 posts)2. I think the OP is on to the real issue...vote counting, not individual vote changing.
brooklynite
(94,493 posts)3. Same thing...no actual evidence
Nor does any candidate who potentially lost from mis-counting claim it happened.
brush
(53,764 posts)4. Ahhh...the repug talking point...no evidence.
But if you're gonna steal an election, the most logical way is to do the counting.
What's that old Russian saying: "It's not who votes, it's who counts the votes."
mythology
(9,527 posts)6. Actual evidence says there were no votes changed
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/06/06/were-2016-vote-counts-in-michigan-and-wisconsin-hacked-we-double-checked/?utm_term=.e4bc42d36224
In brief, we find no evidence that the voting technology favored one candidate more than the other.
Nor could we find any statistical differences correlated with accessibility technologies or with different voting technology vendors.
The tests uncovered nothing suspicious. That supports a conclusion that voting machines themselves were not hacked.
There's also the fact that the national polls were very accurate, substantially more accurate than in 2012 for example.
So no it's not a Republican talking point. It's the truth whether you want to believe it or not. But given all you have is name calling, you likely aren't open to facts inconvenient to your beliefs.
In brief, we find no evidence that the voting technology favored one candidate more than the other.
Nor could we find any statistical differences correlated with accessibility technologies or with different voting technology vendors.
The tests uncovered nothing suspicious. That supports a conclusion that voting machines themselves were not hacked.
There's also the fact that the national polls were very accurate, substantially more accurate than in 2012 for example.
So no it's not a Republican talking point. It's the truth whether you want to believe it or not. But given all you have is name calling, you likely aren't open to facts inconvenient to your beliefs.
brush
(53,764 posts)7. You can believe it. I don't have to. The Russians hacked into voting systems...
just to do window shopping.
Gotcha, the election wasn't stolen.