Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Found on twitter from "The Hoarse Whisperer".... (Original Post) George II Jul 2018 OP
Oh the irony of a think-tank that doesn't think ! OnDoutside Jul 2018 #1
The institute has a $500k budget. Jane's Son's salary is $100k and... The Polack MSgt Jul 2018 #2
Wow, thanks for the detail. So a half a million bucks for THAT? George II Jul 2018 #3
Certainly not good optics. brer cat Jul 2018 #4
So what though? mahina Jul 2018 #6
So what though... The Polack MSgt Jul 2018 #7
What qualifications does Jane's son have? Gothmog Jul 2018 #9
Where did the money come from? n/t murielm99 Jul 2018 #5
I love the Hoarse Whisperer Gothmog Jul 2018 #8

The Polack MSgt

(13,186 posts)
2. The institute has a $500k budget. Jane's Son's salary is $100k and...
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 12:19 PM
Jul 2018

2 other employees are paid $75k a piece. Looks like the other half (WTF!) of the budget produced this:

In a June 2017 interview with USA Today, Jane Sanders said the institute would be producing and distributing “original content,” yet the organization’s website is largely filled with recycled work. In its first year, the group has released just four press releases, three of which were released in its first month of existence.

Under the organization’s “Research and Reports” section of its website, there are 18 posts, 16 of which are reposted from other sources, including from federal agencies and institute fellows. The remaining two posts are authored by Sanders Institute staffers. One is a breakdown of how citizens can contact their elected representatives; the text of the other — entitled A Freedom Budget For All Americans — is attributed to Wikipedia.



brer cat

(24,544 posts)
4. Certainly not good optics.
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 12:40 PM
Jul 2018

Half the money went to salaries for 3 people, one of them Jane's son, and virtually no "original content." I wonder what these people do all day?

mahina

(17,637 posts)
6. So what though?
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 12:46 PM
Jul 2018

It’s not my money, or yours I’m guessing.

People give money to all kinds of goofy things.

It’s still a free country. Mostly.

The Polack MSgt

(13,186 posts)
7. So what though...
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 01:22 PM
Jul 2018

It isn't as if this guy consistently presents himself as somehow different and better than the alternatives. You know, the way all politicians do...

It isn't as if he ever criticized others (for less reason) in similar situations...

Oh wait a second...

I seem to remember his insinuation that the Clinton Foundation was another symptom of the corrupt status quo and that Hillary's association with her OWN CHARITY was "Troubling"

"People give money to all kinds of goofy things" is sorta great as a defense tho

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Found on twitter from "Th...