Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,895 posts)
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 10:29 AM Aug 2018

Judge Ellis begins court with mea culpa for outburst over expert

Manafort prosecutors get what they wanted:

Judge Ellis tells the jury he was wrong in criticizing prosecutors yesterday for having a witnesses, an IRS agent, in the room to hear other witness testimony.

“Put aside any criticism. I was probably wrong in that," Ellis said


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/local/wp/2018/08/09/paul-manafort-trial-day-8-live-coverage/?utm_term=.99e891742caa


27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge Ellis begins court with mea culpa for outburst over expert (Original Post) kpete Aug 2018 OP
Sounds like we have another Judge Lance Ito Greybnk48 Aug 2018 #1
On Rachel, an attorney who's been in front of that judge says he's been that way for 30 years. TheBlackAdder Aug 2018 #16
And a good lawyer tries to make better judges out of them. Ponietz Aug 2018 #20
"He does it to make better attorneys out of them"? Is he running a court or a law school? Towlie Aug 2018 #21
Wow, just wow. "The American people feel pretty strongly that no one has unfettered power." erronis Aug 2018 #23
He can run pretty much whatever he wants Loki Liesmith Aug 2018 #26
See also TPM article, includes more information emulatorloo Aug 2018 #2
An Expert Witness Can Rely on the Testimony of Other Witnesses Despite Not Having Personal Knowlege Stallion Aug 2018 #8
It's not that. It's that the witness was in the courtroom before his testimony More_Cowbell Aug 2018 #10
That's Exactly Why the Prosecution Asked Permission to Allow the Expert to Remain in Courtroom Stallion Aug 2018 #13
Probably wrong? Sanity Claws Aug 2018 #3
Fwiw, an ex-prosecutor who came before him many Hortensis Aug 2018 #11
I've read that, too, that he's always been cranky... yet brilliant... but that seemed like a pretty deurbano Aug 2018 #17
Yes! Observers might get an idea going forward. Hortensis Aug 2018 #27
So much pressure on all of them to get it right. onit2day Aug 2018 #19
If there's that much pressure to get it right, maybe he should assume a lower profile. Nitram Aug 2018 #22
Still a politician in robes and someone tried to convince me otherwise. Fullduplexxx Aug 2018 #4
Wow. Whenever the judge is bigger news than the case there is definitely something wrong. honest.abe Aug 2018 #5
When Uzo Asonye, the prosecutor who was handling this part of the trial... Princess Turandot Aug 2018 #6
"I was PROBABLY wrong in that." sprinkleeninow Aug 2018 #7
Judge Ellis is just a little edgy because he realizes he should have reported it when boys wearing Brother Buzz Aug 2018 #9
And said they'd be waiting outside to take him home..... erronis Aug 2018 #24
You'd think a judge would have comprehended the small print in that verbal..... Brother Buzz Aug 2018 #25
I say again & again, for me it's about his f***ing *behavior* influencing the jury UTUSN Aug 2018 #12
Factoid: Reagan appointed. 78 years old. Equinox Moon Aug 2018 #14
there is something wrong with this judge! VaBchTgerLily Aug 2018 #15
He had to sleep on it? Or talk to someone about it? C Moon Aug 2018 #18

Greybnk48

(10,496 posts)
1. Sounds like we have another Judge Lance Ito
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 10:31 AM
Aug 2018

on our hands, rolling in the spotlight like a dog on a stinky spot.

TheBlackAdder

(29,415 posts)
16. On Rachel, an attorney who's been in front of that judge says he's been that way for 30 years.
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 12:25 PM
Aug 2018

.

He does it to make better attorneys out of them.

.

Ponietz

(3,465 posts)
20. And a good lawyer tries to make better judges out of them.
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 01:11 PM
Aug 2018

Call them by their first name early on, that changes the dynamic pretty quickly.

Towlie

(5,488 posts)
21. "He does it to make better attorneys out of them"? Is he running a court or a law school?
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 01:28 PM
Aug 2018

Judge T. S. Ellis III was appointed by Ronald Reagan.

Salon says:

Ellis has been outspoken from the get-go about his skepticism regarding Mueller's probe of Manafort, earning fulsome praise from Trump in the process.

In May, Ellis reprimanded Mueller's prosecutors by declaring that "you don’t really care about Mr. Manafort’s bank fraud. You really care about getting information Mr. Manafort can give you that would reflect on Mr Trump and lead to his prosecution or impeachment," according to The Guardian. The judge later added, "We don’t want anyone in this country with unfettered power. It’s unlikely you’re going to persuade me the special prosecutor has power to do anything he or she wants. The American people feel pretty strongly that no one has unfettered power."

erronis

(18,437 posts)
23. Wow, just wow. "The American people feel pretty strongly that no one has unfettered power."
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 01:37 PM
Aug 2018
The judge later added, "We don’t want anyone in this country with unfettered power. It’s unlikely you’re going to persuade me the special prosecutor has power to do anything he or she wants. The American people feel pretty strongly that no one has unfettered power."


Since when does a judge get away with determining what "the American people" want? S/he is supposed to be applying the rule of the law and judgments which are above popularity contests.

Loki Liesmith

(4,602 posts)
26. He can run pretty much whatever he wants
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 01:48 PM
Aug 2018

As long as he follows the law and ethics guidelines.

Stallion

(6,621 posts)
8. An Expert Witness Can Rely on the Testimony of Other Witnesses Despite Not Having Personal Knowlege
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 11:09 AM
Aug 2018

....if it is the type of evidence that an expert in his field of expertise would normally rely upon to form his opinion.

More_Cowbell

(2,213 posts)
10. It's not that. It's that the witness was in the courtroom before his testimony
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 11:26 AM
Aug 2018

The attorneys made their usual motion to exclude all witnesses (so they wouldn't be in the courtroom until it was their turn to testify, and wouldn't hear anything else that had gone on) but excepted this FBI agent. The judge asked the defense attorney, who agreed.

Then, as usual, when the agent was on the witness stand, he was asked if he'd been in the courtroom. When he said "yes," the judge blew up, forgetting that he'd signed off on it.

Stallion

(6,621 posts)
13. That's Exactly Why the Prosecution Asked Permission to Allow the Expert to Remain in Courtroom
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 11:53 AM
Aug 2018

there has to be an exception to "the Rule"-RCP 615-which is otherwise mandatory. The exception for him to stay in the courtroom in this case was so he could base his expert testimony on the facts elicited from other witnesses on which his opinion might rely.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_615

Sanity Claws

(22,142 posts)
3. Probably wrong?
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 10:37 AM
Aug 2018

This asshile was definitely wrong and his inability to admit it shows he cares more about himself than justice. Get him out of the courtroom! Impeach the old fucker.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
11. Fwiw, an ex-prosecutor who came before him many
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 11:33 AM
Aug 2018

times says he's actually been top notch intellectually and judicially in spite of harassing the attorneys. He's been prone to going after prosecutors especially for decades, but it did not affect his rulings.

It's possible he's corrupted, but it's also possible he's gotten carried away and is realizing he needs to pull it in. Every adjective is being scrutinized.

Lol. On O'Donnell, someone pointed out that the prosecutor he accused of crying in court once went up against the Bonanno crime family and continued his prosecution with round-the-clock protection while they tried to kill him.

deurbano

(2,961 posts)
17. I've read that, too, that he's always been cranky... yet brilliant... but that seemed like a pretty
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 12:29 PM
Aug 2018

big memory lapse, so I wonder if that "brilliance" is starting to fade.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
27. Yes! Observers might get an idea going forward.
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 02:23 PM
Aug 2018

He reportedly likes attention, but this degree of scrutiny should cause him to be less indulgent and more careful. And if he isn't...?

Nitram

(25,219 posts)
22. If there's that much pressure to get it right, maybe he should assume a lower profile.
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 01:29 PM
Aug 2018
 

honest.abe

(9,238 posts)
5. Wow. Whenever the judge is bigger news than the case there is definitely something wrong.
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 10:56 AM
Aug 2018

Its very unfortunate as this case is very important.

Princess Turandot

(4,836 posts)
6. When Uzo Asonye, the prosecutor who was handling this part of the trial...
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 11:02 AM
Aug 2018

reminded Ellis that he had given them permission to do what they did vis a vis the tax expert on the first day of the trial, the judge blew up at him. He kind of threatened him, telling him to keep in mind that as a prosecutor in that district, he could well appear in his courtroom again.

I'm glad that they filed a complaint.

sprinkleeninow

(20,720 posts)
7. "I was PROBABLY wrong in that."
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 11:05 AM
Aug 2018
WRONG!
You were undoubtedly wrong in that. Sheesh.

💙🇺🇸🌊

Brother Buzz

(38,257 posts)
9. Judge Ellis is just a little edgy because he realizes he should have reported it when boys wearing
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 11:19 AM
Aug 2018

dark glasses and trench coats gave him that big sack of money.

Brother Buzz

(38,257 posts)
25. You'd think a judge would have comprehended the small print in that verbal.....
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 01:45 PM
Aug 2018

No-Cut-Contract.

UTUSN

(73,622 posts)
12. I say again & again, for me it's about his f***ing *behavior* influencing the jury
Thu Aug 9, 2018, 11:53 AM
Aug 2018

And it's been posted many times by his apologists that his comments against the prosecution are "outside of the jury's hearing" but there have been multiple incidents when he has carried on in front of the jury.

And we have plenty of our legalistic pundits here justifying him on the basis that his rulings have been "correct."

I'm no lawyer and have no pretense about special insight, am not focused on legalisms, just on the *intangibles* of behavior and emotion and how whimsical many outcomes can be.

I just hope that the incontrovertible parts of the evidence overwhelm this f***ing judge's despicable behavior.




Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge Ellis begins court ...