Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Tue Jan 3, 2012, 01:40 PM Jan 2012

FBI Didn't Need Warrant (for installation of GPS tracker device), Judge Says

FBI Didn't Need Warrant, Judge Says

ST. LOUIS (CN) - The FBI did not need a warrant to secretly install a GPS tracking device on a St. Louis City Treasurer's Office employee accused of not showing up for work, a federal judge ruled.

Fred Robinson, 69, is accused of stealing more than $250,000 of public money from the Paideia Academy charter school to start a day-care business, and of taking as much as $175,000 from his job in Treasurer Larry Williams' office, where he was allegedly a no-show.

...
But U.S. Magistrate Judge David Noce disagreed, finding that appellate courts have found use of the tracking devices legal, even though the U.S. Supreme Court is still deciding the issue.

"The 8th Circuit held that the agents did not need a warrant prior to installing and using the GPS tracker device," Noce wrote. "The court explained, 'when police have reasonable suspicion that a particular vehicle is transporting drugs, a warrant is not required when, while the vehicle is parked in a public place, they install a non-invasive GPS tracking device on it for a reasonable period of time.' Because installation of the GPS tracker device was non-invasive and because the agents installed the device when the truck was parked in public, installation of the GPS tracker device was not a search."

http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/03/42708.htm

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FBI Didn't Need Warrant (for installation of GPS tracker device), Judge Says (Original Post) The Straight Story Jan 2012 OP
A good example of why we need to restore the rule of law. ixion Jan 2012 #1
First of all - is the FBI responsible for covering the kinds of crimes this person peacetalksforall Jan 2012 #2
Gerald Ford appointment (1976) leveymg Jan 2012 #3
4th Amendment SixthSense Jan 2012 #4
when they took away those rights in drug cases, it started the slide. hobbit709 Jan 2012 #5
If you have reasonable suspicion, apply for a warrant gratuitous Jan 2012 #6
 

SixthSense

(829 posts)
4. 4th Amendment
Tue Jan 3, 2012, 01:54 PM
Jan 2012

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

wouldn't it be great to actually have those rights?

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
6. If you have reasonable suspicion, apply for a warrant
Tue Jan 3, 2012, 01:57 PM
Jan 2012

The flip side of the coin is a police state, with law enforcement monitoring anyone for any reason. You'd think a federal judge would get that whole Fourth Amendment thing, but apparently not.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FBI Didn't Need Warrant (...