Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Doodley

(9,078 posts)
Thu Aug 16, 2018, 07:07 PM Aug 2018

Leaked transcription of Manafort jury deliberations

There's a tense exchange as two Jurors (No 6 and No 2) cannot agree with the 10 others.

Juror No 3: “For God’s sake, why don’t you see the overwhelming evidence before your own eyes?”

Juror No 6: “All I see is fake news and it’s very sad, you lowlife, low IQ dog!”

Juror No 10: “What about the witness testimony?”

Juror No 2: “Are you an illegal? Are you from one of those shithole countries that are sending rapists and murderers? Maybe you are a Muslim. Can I see your birth certificate? You shouldn’t even be here! That’s why we need a wall! Build a wall! (chanting) Build a Wall!”

Juror No 10: “Let’s calm down and stick to the facts, shall we?.”

Juror No 6: “There's truth and there's facts. I’ll give you some alternative facts. We’ve got 10 angry Democrats who have listened to fake news in the courtroom and two white nationalists doing their patriotic duty to find reasonable doubt.”

Juror 12: “What about the mountain of documentation that proves the case?”

Juror No 2: "Fake! This is all part of an illegal witch hunt to damage the greatest president who is making America Great Again.”

At this point, the recording was interrupted - End of transcription.

Yes, this is a joke, but what is to prevent this from happening when over 40% of the nation still say they approve of Trump?

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Leaked transcription of Manafort jury deliberations (Original Post) Doodley Aug 2018 OP
this is a joke right??? a kennedy Aug 2018 #1
You had to ask? PJMcK Aug 2018 #4
There are no Jury Transcripts... FarPoint Aug 2018 #2
It's a joke (n/t) PJMcK Aug 2018 #5
"... those asshole countries..." PJMcK Aug 2018 #3
Thanks. I will fix that. I appreciate your posts. Doodley Aug 2018 #7
DUzy malaise Aug 2018 #6
I know this is a joke...but MontanaMama Aug 2018 #8
This is my fear too. It will only take a couple of Trump fanatics on the Jury. Doodley Aug 2018 #9
what a great way to say it... MontanaMama Aug 2018 #10
It only takes one. I'm old enough to remember the Harrisburg 8 (or was it 7?) hvn_nbr_2 Aug 2018 #11
One or two only means a mistrial, not aquittal stopwastingmymoney Aug 2018 #12

PJMcK

(22,023 posts)
3. "... those asshole countries..."
Thu Aug 16, 2018, 07:13 PM
Aug 2018

That's a mis-transcription. It should be, "... those shithole countries..."

Otherwise, well done, Doodley! All it will take is one jackass on this jury to cause a bad result.

MontanaMama

(23,299 posts)
8. I know this is a joke...but
Thu Aug 16, 2018, 07:19 PM
Aug 2018

I really have a bad feeling that Manafort’s going to walk. The jury's questions for the judge today gave me a knot in my stomach. If Manafort is acquitted, there are forces at work here that we can’t even comprehend. Papadapoulis is considering withdrawal of plea deal...seems like something worse than normal is swirling.

Doodley

(9,078 posts)
9. This is my fear too. It will only take a couple of Trump fanatics on the Jury.
Thu Aug 16, 2018, 07:22 PM
Aug 2018

A not guilty verdict would be rocket fuel to Trump's case that the Russia investigation is a witch hunt.

MontanaMama

(23,299 posts)
10. what a great way to say it...
Thu Aug 16, 2018, 09:50 PM
Aug 2018
A not guilty verdict would be rocket fuel to Trump's case that the Russia investigation is a witch hunt.


It gave my heart a start. I want nothing more than to be celebrating a Manafort conviction with all of you here on DU....but with the Russians and Deplorables lurking everywhere, I am more than cautious.

hvn_nbr_2

(6,486 posts)
11. It only takes one. I'm old enough to remember the Harrisburg 8 (or was it 7?)
Thu Aug 16, 2018, 10:19 PM
Aug 2018

Old case from the Viet Nam era. A number of antiwar activists were on trial for some trumped up reason or other (don't remember). The government selected one of the four (out of 66) counties in PA that voted for Goldwater to try the case and a judge (J. Dixon Herman) who was a wingnut judge who was totally biased against the defense. The defense presented no witnesses or evidence at all, and the jury was still 11-1 to acquit on all charges. The one for conviction was a wingnut who lied to get on the jury and was going to vote guilty on all counts from before the first gavel in the courtroom.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Leaked transcription of M...