Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pecker and National Enquirer (Original Post) TomSlick Aug 2018 OP
I don't think they give immunity to corporations marylandblue Aug 2018 #1
No, but they can get essentially a death sentence. TomSlick Aug 2018 #2
Arthur Anderson was lynched marylandblue Aug 2018 #3
Whether or not Arthur Anderson was lynched, TomSlick Aug 2018 #4
Not likely marylandblue Aug 2018 #5
Hope springs eternal. TomSlick Aug 2018 #6
Not for me, I don't read their crap anyway. marylandblue Aug 2018 #7
While your comment about accounting firms in general is true... Kensan Aug 2018 #8
Okay, you know more about it than I do marylandblue Aug 2018 #9
Yes, the exodus began earlier... Kensan Aug 2018 #10
Accounting firms can also be too big to fail, I guess. marylandblue Aug 2018 #11

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
1. I don't think they give immunity to corporations
Thu Aug 23, 2018, 08:37 PM
Aug 2018

only the people who work there. It's not like the corporation can go to jail.

TomSlick

(11,086 posts)
4. Whether or not Arthur Anderson was lynched,
Thu Aug 23, 2018, 09:00 PM
Aug 2018

and reasonable minds can differ, it is nevertheless sincerely dead. Similarly, if America Media, Inc., that publishes the National Enquirer, is indicted it might suffer a similar fate.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
5. Not likely
Thu Aug 23, 2018, 09:04 PM
Aug 2018

A successful accounting firm is built on trust. Lose that and nobody will hire you. But a magazine conglomerate is based on readers of individual magazines. I never heard of AMI until today, but I heard of most of the magazines it publishes. Most of the never heard of AMI either and will still read their favorite magazines.

Kensan

(180 posts)
8. While your comment about accounting firms in general is true...
Thu Aug 23, 2018, 09:45 PM
Aug 2018

Arthur Andersen imploded not from a "loss of trust", but from being found guilty of obstruction of justice. The firm, as a convicted felon, could not perform audits of publicly traded companies. Between the various accounting and government regulatory agencies (FASB, SEC, etc.), the firm was stripped of their license to practice accounting in several states. Before the final implosion, the firm surrendered their accounting licenses in the remaining states.

Without the ability to perform audits for SEC clients, there was zero chance the firm could stay in business. There was a mad dash out the door of both clients and employees. The remaining "Big 4" accounting firms added to the pain, too. The former AA partners (who had the relationships with their SEC clients) were forced to accept very punitive deals. Bring the client (and your institutional knowledge) with you, but in 2 years you will transfer the client to an existing partner at "New Accounting Firm". You are then on the clock to build up a new book of business (several million $$ of fees) in 2 more years, or else.

I knew several extremely bitter former AA partners that lost their livelihoods, their homes and all their built-up capital in AA due to the criminal activities of persons they never even met. 85,000 worldwide employees at the time AA went down.

Full disclosure, I'm a former Arthur Andersen alum. However, I left the firm long before Enron (by about a decade). I was already sensing the shift in culture when it was converted from Arthur Andersen, Inc. to Arthur Andersen LLP. I thought several partners started to get sloppy thinking "limited liability" sounded really good. To paraphrase the Princess Bride, I don't think it means what they thought it meant.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
9. Okay, you know more about it than I do
Thu Aug 23, 2018, 09:56 PM
Aug 2018

But from what I recall, the exodus began as soon as it came out that AA had approved Enron's screwy accounting, even before they were found guilty.

Kensan

(180 posts)
10. Yes, the exodus began earlier...
Thu Aug 23, 2018, 10:07 PM
Aug 2018

When the firm was indicted, the exodus began. The writing was on the wall. I think most believed the government would do what they always do...assess a fine and let business return to normal. The stock market was still in shambles after the tech bust, and the country was still healing from 9/11. There was no way a major accounting firm would be given a death sentence, right?

The indictment signaled an ominous future. The amazing thing is that KPMG was also fraught with its own issues at the time, and was in serious danger themselves. AA just jumped off the cliff faster. The implosion of AA was enough to scare the SEC and a Senate oversight committee that another major accounting firm failure was a terrible idea for worldwide finances. So KPMG tucked its tail, paid a hefty fine, fired a few folks, and went back to work.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pecker and National Enqui...