General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOhr says Christopher Steele told him Russian intelligence believed it had Trump "over a barrel"
Ohr says Christopher Steele told him Russian intelligence believed it had Donald Trump "over a barrel
WASHINGTON (AP) A senior Justice Department lawyer says a former British spy told him at a breakfast meeting two years ago that Russian intelligence believed it had Donald Trump over a barrel, according to multiple people familiar with the encounter.
The lawyer, Bruce Ohr, also says he learned that a Trump campaign aide had met with higher-level Russian officials than the aide had acknowledged, the people said.
The previously unreported details of the July 30, 2016, breakfast with Christopher Steele, which Ohr described to lawmakers this week in a private interview, reveal an exchange of potentially explosive information about Trump between two men the president has relentlessly sought to discredit.
............
Among the things Ohr said he learned from Steele during the breakfast was that an unnamed former Russian intelligence official had said that Russian intelligence believed they had Trump over a barrel, according to people familiar with the meeting. It was not clear from Ohrs interview whether Steele had been directly told that or had picked that up through his contacts, but the broader sentiment is echoed in Steeles research dossier.
..........
https://apnews.com/4ac772445073491aa7d3ca9e558e0144
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,669 posts)dalton99a
(81,443 posts)dem4decades
(11,282 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)have probably disabused Ohr, Comey, Mueller or Steele of that notion
unitedwethrive
(1,997 posts)Don't you just wonder how they could hear this, and then justify their continued support of the orange one?
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)Just saying...
YessirAtsaFact
(2,064 posts)But a barrel would be okay for now.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)YessirAtsaFact
(2,064 posts)robersl
(83 posts)the saying is "Russia has Trump under a barrel", not "over a barrel". Why the hell would Trump care about being "over" a barrel?
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)This is an American phrase and first appeared in the mid-20th century. It is supposed that it alludes to the actual situation of being draped over a barrel, either to empty the lungs of someone who has been close to drowning, or to give a flogging. Either way, the position of helplessness and in being under someone else's control is what is being referred to.
Looks like you're right. It still doesn't make any sense, but that is the saying.
YessirAtsaFact
(2,064 posts)Making literal sense is optional.
However, picture a big wooden barrel lying on its side. Picture a person lying across the middle of it, their body parallel to the top and bottom of the barrel. Their feet are off the floor.
They are helpless in that position.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/26/opinion/stormy-daniels-trump-60-minutes.html
* aka republican Draft-Dodger-in-Chief
Marcuse
(7,478 posts)Sanity Claws
(21,846 posts)If you don't understand an idiom, look it up. Don't just presume it is wrong.
robersl
(83 posts)you look everything up before you say it? Why do you feel the need to make this comment?
Sanity Claws
(21,846 posts)Yes, I check things before saying someone is wrong.
robersl
(83 posts)to run into the one person who has never made a mistake. My apologies for offending your superior sensibilities.
I wasn't saying YOU were wrong, just the reporter who wrote the article.
Sanity Claws
(21,846 posts)No wonder you get into arguments with people. You claim to know more than others. Then you read things in my answer that I never said. I never said I never made a mistake. I said that I check before calling out others and saying they are wrong.
robersl
(83 posts)can I go now?
erronis
(15,232 posts)You can look it up.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,832 posts)yardwork
(61,588 posts)When tarantula took to the hills.
ginnyinWI
(17,276 posts)Not only do we want a good leader who is a good role model and represents us well to the world, we don't want a crooked character who is in thick with criminals and has a lot to hide or be blackmailed with!
bucolic_frolic
(43,124 posts)Hope they selected a stout one
Harker
(14,012 posts)He wound up under the table.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)maybe needs to be included in Mueller's investigation.
Hekate
(90,641 posts)Doodley
(9,078 posts)it is something so disgusting that it would destroy him. That is why he is so desperate to discredit Mueller and undermine the investigation. An innocent person has no reason to behave like that.
potone
(1,701 posts)I am less inclined to think that it is sleazy sexual behavior than that it is financial. I think he has been involved in very shady financial transactions with Russian oligarchs.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)behavior and have made up their minds about him. It would have to be something far more damaging to his image/brand, most likely involving finances.
underpants
(182,762 posts)This was why Steele started working on the dossier to begin with plus it's pretty obvious that Trump is beholden to Russians.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)One of the oddest fellows in this whole mess.
duforsure
(11,885 posts)Ohr is a spy or he is the one compromised. He'll try to criminalize him now.
Gothmog
(145,119 posts)0rganism
(23,938 posts)why can't we have nice things?