General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSteel made everybody LOL on AMJoy!
Joy asked him what he thought of Gillum, and he said well I think he's very "articulate!"
Come on, Mike, just switch parties. You know you want to do it!
CurtEastPoint
(18,638 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Or maybe he gets more gigs as a Republican.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)We dont do this enough. It gets people
Fired Up!
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)He mentioned yesterday during the funeral that he had studied for the priesthood. I did not know that.
He is anti-choice. They can keep him.
From his wiki entry -
After graduating from Hopkins, Steele worked for one year as a high school teacher at Malvern Preparatory School in Pennsylvania, teaching classes in world history and economics.[15] He spent three years preparing for the Catholic priesthood at the Augustinian Friars Seminary at Villanova University,[16] which he left prior to ordination to enter civil service.[17]
In 1991, Steele graduated from Georgetown Law School. He failed the Maryland bar exam, but passed the Pennsylvania exam.[18][19]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Steele
Hekate
(90,633 posts)...talking to a bunch of GOP interns in D.C. That's when I learned he'd been a seminarian. I think he is deeply principled, and deeply conservative. But the Gospel he lives by is rooted in compassion, love, and above all, intelligent self-reflection -- my words, not his.
One of the youngsters asked him something about the GOP and moral authority (mind you, with a straight face). Steele burst out, "OH HELL, NO!" and words to the effect that the GOP had spent decades telling him and everyone else who they could love, how they could love, what was evil, etc etc etc, the whole catalog of their hypocritical moralizing -- "So DON'T TELL ME" -- my gods, the man was passionate.
So we should ask ourselves this: Who better to talk to young Republicans? They sure won't listen to any of us.
Volaris
(10,269 posts)and NOT act as a model for adjustments to Law or National Policy, I kinda don't mind.
As far as I'm concerned it's not different than him deciding that wearing baseball caps in public was immoral...I don't give a fuck what he wants to do with his own head, that's his personal choice (and isnt nice that were the Party that allows for him to make that personal moral choice for himself without any government interference?).
As long as he isn't trying to legislate what I can do with MY HEAD, and understands that his personal view is not the view of the Democratic Party Platform, he's welcome over here as far as I'm concerned.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)What he supports is anti-choice. It is public policy.
So, no pass for him.
Volaris
(10,269 posts)And you're right...In that case they can keep him.
MurrayDelph
(5,293 posts)A college buddy of mine had a job that required he pass the bar somewhere, and he'd already flunked the California bar. So he took the Pennsylvania bar.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)is the easiest as per what our Neighbor says.
gibraltar72
(7,501 posts)Nitram
(22,781 posts)The problem is, I assume, that he wouldn't be special or unusual in the Democratic Party.