Well, *that* sure knocked Woodward's book off as Topic Of The Day

[AndJusticeForSome]

Using a very Trumpian strategy of deflection and distraction.

[elleng]

1. Right, sure did,

notwitstanding NYT's 'intention!'

[emulatorloo]

8. No it confirms the Woodward book. Another witness. Op-ed refers to Woodward's book too. n/t

[NastyRiffraff]

9. Exactly.

My first thought was that the author of the op ed was one of Woodward's sources. And it indirectly confirms the book's veracity. The timing alone is interesting.

[brush]

2. What did?

[manor321]

4. The bombshell op ed in the NYT

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/opinion/trump-white-house-anonymous-resistance.html

[brush]

6. Thank you. I've been offline for a while.

[manor321]

3. No. This AMPLIFIES Woodward's book! It even LINKS to an article on the book!

This is very good for us.

[AndJusticeForSome]

5. Well, it almost surely did so for Trump

His witch Hunt just got narrower.

[brooklynite]

7. Except that Trump doesn't engage in strategy...it requires too much advance planning

[uponit7771]

10. Unnnn, seems to afirm Woodward's claims

[ecstatic]

11. +1000.nt