General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat Exactly Does Kamala Harris Have On Brett Kavanaugh?
Harris didnt confront him with a document, so whatever this is, her sources for this conversation are outside of the paltry email dump the committee got. She continues to press him on whether or not hes spoken with anyone at Kasowitz about the Mueller investigation and he keeps asking her to identify who shes thinking of. She delivers a remarkably cold: I think youre thinking of someone and you dont want to tell us.
What in the hell was all that?!? Was Kavanaugh covertly counseling Kasowitz on Trumps defense? It would seem as though she could have dropped the hammer and gotten more specific. Not for nothing, but my immediate reaction was this may have had nothing to do with Mueller at all. Harris seemed less interested in building a case for recusal than making sure Kavanaugh knew that she knew that he knew someone at Kasowitz and that she could introduce that fact into the record at any given moment between now and the final vote on the floor.
(emphasis added)
At this point, its up to our imaginations what that could mean, but a seasoned prosecutor leaning on someone based on their acquaintances doesnt generally bode well for the witness. Certainly felt like the prosecutorial equivalent of nice little nomination you got here shame if anything happened to it that defendants hear all the time. Except instead of getting him to flip, shes giving him a chance to walk away unscathed by whatever she thinks she has.
Could she be bluffing? Looks like well get a chance to find out. This mystery is going to be far, far more exciting than anything else were likely to see on Day 3 when a cavalcade of witnesses will praise and condemn him in entirely predictable ways.
Unless someone from Kasowitz makes a surprise apperance on the witness list.
MORE:
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
https://abovethelaw.com/2018/09/and-now-marc-kasowitz-shows-up-in-these-hearings-on-to-day-3/
https://splinternews.com/kamala-harris-seems-to-know-something-brett-kavanaugh-d-1828847276
Pachamama
(16,887 posts)And Kamala Harris keeping her cool and almost looking like the cat who caught the mouse....
She does know something. And so does Kavanaugh. And this moment marks something very important.
And the fact that it may tie into Mueller and to Trump is very very important.
I thought she looked happier and happier the more he feigned innocent confusion. I think she has some evidence but wasn't sure it was worth pursuing until he started acting stupid.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Whats the point of being cryptic like that?
rickford66
(5,523 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)inviting him to step forward if he chooses.
Nitram
(22,791 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)way too far? The implication is apparently that Kavanaugh may have used this law firm to relay his willingness to serve Trump to Trump before being selected. Maybe prosecuting, or yammering from others to prosecute, Kavanaugh isn't a distraction our leadership would want at this time?
Nitram
(22,791 posts)resign.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)withdraw his wildfire would then be contained so that resources could be shifted to the others raging.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)So she cant ask him about that document specifically, which is why she was asking about ancillary details.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)has is probably not among the meager documents provided to senate Democrats. Of those, only some are labeled that way.
My guess, though, is that nothing this incriminating or disabling (requiring recusal from all Trump issues) would have been provided to the Democrats.
Go, Senator Harris! Any proof of lying, or at least prevaricating, in this hearing would make a nice underline to Kavanaugh's record of lying under oath a number of times before.
But, of course, if she has the means to prove he spoke with someone before the nomination who was in position to be a back channel for relaying Kavanaugh's feelings to Trump...!
ewagner
(18,964 posts)Kavanaugh was baiting her to reveal classified information when he challenged her to come up with a name...she didn't take the bait.
FakeNoose
(32,634 posts)...where he'll have to agree to recuse himself on all decisions regarding Trump and Russia. He knows he has to but he's trying to weasel out of it. We'll see if Kamala will challenge him directly now.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)She can't at this point reveal them, but she warned the GOP and Kavanaugh that she knows. If he lies, the Dems will go all out to release the docs.
George II
(67,782 posts)... I think a lot of "committee confidential" documents are going to be made public in the next few days.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)I don't think so. Keeping my seat belt fastened.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)madaboutharry
(40,208 posts)She is an experienced prosecutor. She would not ask a question she didnt already know the answer to.
She caught Kavanaugh in a very serious lie.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)Hes still an asshole that shouldnt even be on the court of appeals, much less the Supreme Court. Unfortunately, i didnt see any damage inflicted that would prevent republicans from voting for him.
mitch96
(13,892 posts)That would be an easy out for him if she DOES have someting on him. I hope I hope I hope...
m
MontanaMama
(23,307 posts)in time to stop this? You just know that there was a flurry to get stories straight last night.
Nitram
(22,791 posts)DownriverDem
(6,228 posts)We all know that kavanaugh would be a horrible choice. However, we also know that the repubs have the votes.
dlk
(11,552 posts)This is Kamalas House!... Dont bring that mess up in here!
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)Nitram
(22,791 posts)EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Is the guy I talked to going to talk? Did he talk about it? Is there a tape of it? A memo? Is there any way for others to know? No, he's not going to talk about it.
There's a chance he's trying to protect himself, in case he did talk to someone but didn't know the guy worked there. But I don't think so, because the appropriate, good faith, honest answer to that would be, "Not to my knowledge."
But that opens up the question...WHO all have you spoken with about the Mueller investigation? What did you say? And he doesn't want to answer that.
He's a slippery eel. THE FIX IS IN. He has let it be known that he won't RECUSE himself (you can bet Trump asked him that, given how angry he is about Sessions recusing himself) AND his beliefs are that he can't be indicted while in office AND the investigation went beyond the scope allowed by law. Boom. Trump goes on until 2020.
1. Kavanaugh is confirmed.
2. The W.H. files a lawsuit to stop the Mueller investigation by claiming a number of legal theories: Beyond the scope allowed by law; a witch hunt; taking too long; interfering with the running of the government, etc.
3. If the W.H. loses, it's immediately appealed to the S.Ct., where the 5 Repubs, with the sure-thing plants (Kavanaugh & Gorsuch), decide in favor of the W.H.
calimary
(81,220 posts)orangecrush
(19,537 posts)CentralMass
(15,265 posts)nomination process.
Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)The only thing we can do is vote and hope the machines aren't rigged and hope not too many voters aren't disenfranchised by the voter ID laws.
bucolic_frolic
(43,128 posts)and he's trying to limit it to the one she will name, which she won't. It will really unsettle him. He knows that she knows but he can't admit, or doesn't want to admit, and knows the bombshell will break, and it distracts him from other questions which will make him glib, which will create more damage.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,128 posts)The Democratic Party has selected well ... more than a token number of military veterans and federal prosecutors in their ranks ... what more can we do to assert the rule of law? This is a better slate than GOP offerings of corrupt businessmen and preachers
ananda
(28,858 posts)And so does Kavanaugh.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)Her sly half smile seemed to make him squirm.
Lets go, Sen. Harris!
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)barbtries
(28,787 posts)she's got something, and he does NOT want it made public. ha
CALL 202 224 3121 even if your senators (like mine) don't care what you say and come November VOTE
argyl
(3,064 posts)Senator Harris really has him rattled. She's quite impressive.
Brother Buzz
(36,416 posts)Kamala Harris is one smart cookie