Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here are the committee confidential documents that Cory Booker just released and that prompted an... (Original Post) steve2470 Sep 2018 OP
What's it all mean? superpatriotman Sep 2018 #1
I read through it also and don't understand most of it but it does appear chelsea0011 Sep 2018 #2
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pea, 515 U.S. 200 (1995), was a landmark United States Supreme Court elleng Sep 2018 #4
The BIG issue is that they were withheld for "SECURITY" reasons... Miles Archer Sep 2018 #5
It means that the "Committee Confidential" wall is falling AndJusticeForSome Sep 2018 #6
BOOM! AndJusticeForSome Sep 2018 #3
K&R... spanone Sep 2018 #7
Ok. I read most of it. My biggest question is why was it Committee confidential? Freethinker65 Sep 2018 #8
The rethug meaning of "confidential information" SharonClark Sep 2018 #9
Senator Booker's tweet steve2470 Sep 2018 #10

chelsea0011

(10,115 posts)
2. I read through it also and don't understand most of it but it does appear
Thu Sep 6, 2018, 11:09 AM
Sep 2018

that they were willing to use race profiling on an "interim" basis. Although being race neutral was the goal.

elleng

(130,825 posts)
4. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pea, 515 U.S. 200 (1995), was a landmark United States Supreme Court
Thu Sep 6, 2018, 11:12 AM
Sep 2018

case which held that racial classifications, imposed by the federal government, must be analyzed under a standard of "strict scrutiny," the most stringent level of review which requires that racial classifications be narrowly tailored to further compelling governmental interests. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the majority opinion of the Court, which effectively overturned Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC, 497 U.S. 547 (1990), in which the Court had created a two tiered system for analyzing racial classifications. Adarand held the federal government to the same standards as the state and local governments through a process of "reverse incorporation," in which the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause was held to bind the federal government to the same standards as state and local governments are bound under the 14th Amendment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adarand_Constructors,_Inc._v._Pe%C3%B1a

Kavanaugh questioned the standard used by the Court in the decision.

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
5. The BIG issue is that they were withheld for "SECURITY" reasons...
Thu Sep 6, 2018, 11:12 AM
Sep 2018

...and Booker's stance was that there were no "SECURITY" issues in them.

Grassly didn't want them to be released because they answered questions about Kavanaugh that he didn't want answered.

AndJusticeForSome

(537 posts)
6. It means that the "Committee Confidential" wall is falling
Thu Sep 6, 2018, 11:12 AM
Sep 2018

I haven't even read the docs yet, but Booker uploading them is the real significance to me.

Freethinker65

(10,008 posts)
8. Ok. I read most of it. My biggest question is why was it Committee confidential?
Thu Sep 6, 2018, 11:16 AM
Sep 2018

It discusses the back and forth workings of Kavanaugh on issues of race, security, the power of the unitary executive and the solicitor general. There was nothing confidential in it that I could see, except for perhaps the names of people in the email chain that could have been redacted if necessary.
If Kavanaugh believes what he wrote, he should have no problem defending it. I am NOT saying I agree with his arguments.

SharonClark

(10,014 posts)
9. The rethug meaning of "confidential information"
Thu Sep 6, 2018, 11:21 AM
Sep 2018

Information that, if released, would prove the GOP's intent and lies.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here are the committee co...