Distraction. From. Woodward.

[Iggo]

Nothing else.

[brooklynite]

1. Well, when you explain it like that...

[drray23]

2. Elaborate ? Nt.

[manor321]

3. It is just nonsense

Every time there is a significant news story, some people have to post that it is really a distraction from some OTHER news story.

[drray23]

8. What's nonsense ? I would not call anything Woodward writes nonsense.

You mean the fact people look at everything thinking it's some clever maneuver to hide something else?

I think the Woodward's book stands on it's own and it's not an attempt to derail conversation. Its solid journalistic work.

[hlthe2b]

4. Squirrel!

(since I've not a clue what you are posting about, I just thought I'd post something for my doggy girl)

[Kaleva]

5. It seems to confirm what Woodward wrote.

More of an addendum then a distraction.

[Iggo]

7. Sure does.

[Trust Buster]

6. Should he have not written the book ? How can framing Don the Con as unhinged and unfit to

Be president be just a distraction ? I thought that was our whole point of contention from the beginning ?

[BigmanPigman]

9. Not when his book comes out to the public.

It comes out on Sept 11th...9/11. I hope it has as half the impact of when the World Trade Center was attacked.

[mcar]

10. What?

are you suggesting Bob Woodward spent how many months researching and writing this book as a distraction to benefit Dotard?

[marble falls]

11. And somehow got his sources all on tape. Woodward's book is the grownups' ...

version of "Fire and Fury".

[mcar]

13. All a distraction!!!111

Cause Dotard planned it all with Woodward. Or something.

[marble falls]

15. If we could only figure it out!

[ZZenith]

12. I believe the OP is calling into question the intention

of the “anonymous alt-resistance” op-ed.

[jcgoldie]

14. Ahhh, that "from"...

English is so confusing sometimes...

[ZZenith]

16. What do you mean by that?

[jcgoldie]

19. from

Could mean Woodward is providing a distraction... or that someone else is distracting from his book... you read it one way and most everyone else the other... I have no idea what the OP meant I was just reveling in the ambiguity of the prepositional phrase...

[ZZenith]

22. Sorry - I was just having fun with the idea that English is so confusing sometimes.

But I thank you for your amplification.

[Bernardo de La Paz]

17. Context free, no link, no quote, no explanation. Useless OP.

[Nonhlanhla]

20. I think the OP meant

That the NYT op-ed was a distraction to take attention away from Woodward's important book.

[oasis]

21. "Where is Task Force 34?... the world wonders".