Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow many lies under oath to Congress does a nominee get to make?
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/brett-kavanaughs-dubious-claims-under-oath-draw-close-scrutinyBrett Kavanaughs dubious claims under oath draw close scrutiny
(snip)
The New York Times obtained previously unreported documents from Kavanaughs past late yesterday, and there are some notable revelations in the leaked materials. As we discussed earlier, in 2003, then-White House lawyer wrote an email in which he questioned whether Roe v. Wade should be seen as settled law of the land.
(snip)
Not to put too fine a point on this, but if Kavanaugh discussed warrantless surveillance with the Justice Department in 2001, but later said under oath that he didnt know anything about warrantless surveillance, then its entirely possible he misled the Senate during a confirmation hearing.
(snip)
Making matters worse, as Rachel noted on the show last night, Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vt.) turned his attention yesterday to an incident from 2002 and 2003, in which a Republican Senate staffer stole thousands of documents from Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Kavanaugh, who worked closely with the staffer at the time, said in his 2006 confirmation hearings that he didnt know anything about the theft and leaks of the Democratic materials.
(snip)
Making matters worse, as Rachel noted on the show last night, Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vt.) turned his attention yesterday to an incident from 2002 and 2003, in which a Republican Senate staffer stole thousands of documents from Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Kavanaugh, who worked closely with the staffer at the time, said in his 2006 confirmation hearings that he didnt know anything about the theft and leaks of the Democratic materials.
(end snip)
How is someone who lied multiple times under oath not disbarred, let alone given a life time appointment to the highest court in the land? Anyone?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 553 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How many lies under oath to Congress does a nominee get to make? (Original Post)
deminks
Sep 2018
OP
unblock
(52,196 posts)1. all of them.
if you're a republican, anyway....
deminks
(11,014 posts)2. Newly Released Emails Show Brett Kavanaugh May Have Perjured Himself at Least Four Times
Nevilledog
(51,080 posts)3. I hate the use of the word misled.
If you do not know the answer to a question you would reply "I don't know". Answering Yes or No to such a question is a fucking lie.
deminks
(11,014 posts)4. Five Times Brett Kavanaugh Appears to Have Lied to Congress While Under Oath
MiniMe
(21,714 posts)5. Are they republican or Democrat?
Republicans can tell all they want with no consequences, Democrats can only tell 1.