Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Obvious Suspect
The Obvious Suspect
The quest to unmask the New York Times op-ed writer has been filled with speculation. But the articles prose points to one person in particular.
By William Saletan
Sept 07, 20181:15 PM
Who wrote the anonymous op-ed against President Trump in Wednesdays New York Times? All we know for certain is what the Times disclosed: that its a senior official in the Trump administration. But the most likely author, based on the op-eds content and style, is the U.S. ambassador to Russia, Jon Huntsman.
Huntsman is an obvious suspect for several reasons. The articles themes are classic Huntsman: effusive about conservative policies, blunt about low character. In 2016, he made the same points for and against Trump. The topic that gets the most space and detail in the piece is Huntsmans current area, Russia. (As Slates Fred Kaplan points out, Trump has been circumventing and undermining Huntsman.) The prose, as in Huntsmans speeches and interviews, is flamboyantly erudite. The tone, like Huntsmans, is pious. And the articles stated motiveAmericans should know that there are adults in the roommatches a letter that Huntsman wrote to the Salt Lake Tribune in July. In the letter, Huntsman, responding to a columnist who thought the ambassador should resign rather than keep working for Trump, explained that public servants such as himself were dutifully attending to the nations business.
Like other suspects, Huntsman has issued a statement to deflect accusations that he wrote the Times op-ed. But the statementactually just a tweetdoesnt come from Huntsman. It comes from the spokesperson at the U.S. Embassy in Moscow. The full text reads, Amb Huntsman: Come to find, when youre serving as the U.S. envoy in Moscow, youre an easy target on all sides. Anything sent out by me would have carried my name. An early political lesson I learned: never send an anonymous op-ed.
Thats a non-denial denial. The Times has already said that the authors identity is known to us. So the piece cant have been sent anonymously. It must have carried the authors name. Which means the statement from Huntsmans spokesperson is technically accurate, even if he wrote the piece. And no matter what he says, hes still the most likely suspectat least until somebody else steps forward to claim responsibilitybecause the piece is full of telltale words and phrases. Here are some of them.
more...
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/new-york-times-op-ed-anonymous-writer-trump.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 653 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Obvious Suspect (Original Post)
babylonsister
Sep 2018
OP
GeorgeGist
(25,294 posts)1. He's in Moscow, NO?
babylonsister
(170,960 posts)2. I think so, but
there are faxes, e-mails, countless ways to communicate.