Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Fri Sep 7, 2018, 10:07 PM Sep 2018

Michael Cohen's shell company agrees to tear up the original 2016 agreement with Stormy Daniels...

MJ Lee
?
Verified account

@mj_lee

NEW: Michael Cohen's shell company, Essential Consultants, agrees to tear up the original 2016 agreement with Stormy Daniels, in which Cohen arranged to pay her $130,000 to stay silent about her alleged affair with Donald Trump. It’s also requesting Stormy pay back the $130,000

6:52 PM - 7 Sep 2018




MJ Lee
?
Verified account

@mj_lee
Follow Follow @mj_lee
More
Cohen lawyer Brent Blakely: “Today, Essential Consultants LLC and Michael Cohen have effectively put an end to the lawsuits filed against them by Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels.“ Adds Stormy is required to pay back the $130,000 per California law.

6:54 PM - 7 Sep 2018




MJ Lee
?
Verified account

@mj_lee

Stormy lawyer Michael Avenatti on CNN: “What they're trying to do is they don't want me to get a chance to depose Michael Cohen and Donald Trump. This is a hail mary to try and avoid that, that's my first guess."

6:55 PM - 7 Sep 2018


2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Michael Cohen's shell company agrees to tear up the original 2016 agreement with Stormy Daniels... (Original Post) Miles Archer Sep 2018 OP
Avenatti on a mission.. HipChick Sep 2018 #1
And what is the mission? jberryhill Sep 2018 #2
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
2. And what is the mission?
Fri Sep 7, 2018, 11:02 PM
Sep 2018

Here’s a question from the “Bar Exam for Simpletons”:


If the other side is making an offer of the complete relief that the client is seeking in litigation, the lawyer should ________________.

The answer should be obvious. Because simply pursuing litigation itself as a vehicle to harass the defendant is an improper purpose.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Michael Cohen's shell com...