General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis week, I voted against honoring Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg...
My Neighborhood Association was asked by the Brooklyn Borough President to endorse naming the Municipal Building for Justice Ginsburg, a Brooklyn native, in honor of her 25 years on the Court.
I said that, while I have the utmost respect and admiration for Justice Ginsburg, she's still serving as a Government Official. Namings are intended to commemorate someone's cumulative achievements. In her case, those achievements are still being written. There'll be plenty of opportunities to honor her when she retires.
True Dough
(17,302 posts)Of course we'd all like to see her outlive Dolt 45's term in office but at 85 that may not happen.
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)Not justices nor members of Congress.
For that reason, I disagree. I see no conflict of interest in honoring her long service.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)I don't believe that things should be named for the living, but that such honors should be given post mortem and best after a few years to allow history to pass some judgment.
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)is still fucking alive to get the honors first hand.