Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,502 posts)
Thu Sep 13, 2018, 11:24 AM Sep 2018

This week, I voted against honoring Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg...

My Neighborhood Association was asked by the Brooklyn Borough President to endorse naming the Municipal Building for Justice Ginsburg, a Brooklyn native, in honor of her 25 years on the Court.

I said that, while I have the utmost respect and admiration for Justice Ginsburg, she's still serving as a Government Official. Namings are intended to commemorate someone's cumulative achievements. In her case, those achievements are still being written. There'll be plenty of opportunities to honor her when she retires.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This week, I voted against honoring Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg... (Original Post) brooklynite Sep 2018 OP
She could be deceased before she retires True Dough Sep 2018 #1
I would think most define "government officials" as members of the Executive Branch hlthe2b Sep 2018 #2
Curmudgeon. Should have voted for it. NT Adrahil Sep 2018 #3
Agreed Sherman A1 Sep 2018 #4
God forbid that someone lillypaddle Sep 2018 #5
What lillypaddle said.......... WillowTree Sep 2018 #6

True Dough

(17,302 posts)
1. She could be deceased before she retires
Thu Sep 13, 2018, 11:28 AM
Sep 2018

Of course we'd all like to see her outlive Dolt 45's term in office but at 85 that may not happen.

hlthe2b

(102,225 posts)
2. I would think most define "government officials" as members of the Executive Branch
Thu Sep 13, 2018, 11:35 AM
Sep 2018

Not justices nor members of Congress.

For that reason, I disagree. I see no conflict of interest in honoring her long service.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
4. Agreed
Thu Sep 13, 2018, 11:49 AM
Sep 2018

I don't believe that things should be named for the living, but that such honors should be given post mortem and best after a few years to allow history to pass some judgment.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This week, I voted agains...