Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,502 posts)
Mon Sep 17, 2018, 02:37 PM Sep 2018

A thoughtful commentary on the "Presidential Alert" squabble...

In 2012 (under Obama), the WEA system was fully deployed and operational. Since that time it has been used to provide AMBER alerts and NOAA weather alerts… but has never transmitted any Presidential Alerts. This is because the use and operation of the system is very tightly restricted and regulated by conditions in the Warning, Alert, and Response (WARN) Act of 2006.

Another requirement of IPAWS is that they conduct regular regional tests as well as at least one national test every 3 years. Obviously it’s a complicated process getting a system as wide-spread and all-encompassing as this to operate bug-free… and many of the past national tests have been less than error free (to be nice). But testing needs to continue until they get it right.

So Trump did not cause this test to happen… it was a scheduled necessity.

One last bit to chew on, Trump has had access to IPAWS as long as he’s been Resident. Don’t you think he would have taken advantage of it by now if he could? I’d say the fact that we haven’t all been subjected to obnoxious push messages from Ol’ Cheeto-head for his whole term says that just maybe those WARN restrictions are doing their job.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/9/17/1796287/-Don-t-fall-for-the-Presidential-Alert-scam-please

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
1. "Don't you think he would have taken advantage of it by now"?
Mon Sep 17, 2018, 02:40 PM
Sep 2018

Maybe he just found out about it. Understanding the processes and procedures of governance has not been a real strong suit to this point in the Trump administration.

onenote

(42,694 posts)
4. The statute mandates that the system be tested within 3 years of the statute's April 2016 enactment
Mon Sep 17, 2018, 02:55 PM
Sep 2018

We justifiably dump on FEMA when it screws up. In this instance, they're actually trying to follow the law and test a system to see if it has any bugs in it and yet some people want to dump on them for that.

onenote

(42,694 posts)
3. Basically correct. One clarification
Mon Sep 17, 2018, 02:54 PM
Sep 2018

The currently planned test is specifically required by legislation not mentioned (at least as far as I can tell) in the dailykos article: the Integrated Public Alert Warning System (IPAWS) Modernization Act, which was passed unanimously by the House and Senate and signed into law by President Obama in April 2016 and which specifically mandates actions by FEMA with respect to the implementation of a national emergency alert system and requires that the system be tested within 3 years of the law's enactment.

https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ143/PLAW-114publ143.pdf

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A thoughtful commentary o...