Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Archae

(46,291 posts) Wed Sep 19, 2018, 07:43 AM Sep 2018

Fake weed making people sick...

Why buy this rat poison contaminated crap when the real thing is so easy to get?

MADISON, Wis. (WBAY) - Wisconsin has confirmed 16 more cases of severe bleeding linked to the use of synthetic cannabinoids, also known as fake weed.

https://www.wbay.com/content/news/Wisconsin-confirms-16-more-cases-of-bleeding-linked-to-fake-weed-493634691.html

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fake weed making people sick... (Original Post) Archae Sep 2018 OP

legalize it, and the fake weed goes by by angstlessk Sep 2018 #1

to get around drug screening is what I heard Blues Heron Sep 2018 #2

Must be Republican weed dreamland Sep 2018 #3

Thanks for calling it FAKE weed ! eppur_se_muova Sep 2018 #4

angstlessk

(11,862 posts)

1. legalize it, and the fake weed goes by by

Reply to Archae (Original post)

Wed Sep 19, 2018, 07:48 AM

Sep 2018

Blues Heron

(5,925 posts)

2. to get around drug screening is what I heard

Reply to Archae (Original post)

Wed Sep 19, 2018, 08:14 AM

Sep 2018

unintended consequences.

dreamland

(964 posts)

3. Must be Republican weed

Reply to Archae (Original post)

Wed Sep 19, 2018, 09:14 AM

Sep 2018

They can't tell real from fake.

eppur_se_muova

(36,246 posts)

4. Thanks for calling it FAKE weed !

Reply to Archae (Original post)

Wed Sep 19, 2018, 10:13 AM

Sep 2018

I go on a rant whenver anyone uses the grossly incorrect term "synthetic marijuana". It's synthetic alright, but it's NOT any of the chemicals found in MJ. It's not a natural product at all.

Reply to this discussion