General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsgood and frightening read, slate "The Rosenstein Line"
The Rosenstein Line
The deputy attorney general is keeping his job for now, but our democratic institutions arent looking so healthy.
By YASCHA MOUNK
SEPT 24, 20184:11 PM
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/rod-rosenstein-line-deputy-attorney-general-trump-hostile-democracy.html
Humans are tribal animals. As Jonathan Haidt argues in The Righteous Mind, evenperhaps especiallythe smartest and best educated among us dont look at a body of evidence dispassionately, drawing logical conclusions from objective data. Instead, we approach any question with strong priors. If we want to believe some proposition because it fits our general worldview, we ask: May I believe it? If we know that it would challenge some of our long-held beliefs, we go: Do I have to?
This is why a sliver of plausible justifiability is a key tool in the authoritarian playbook. Populists dont transparently attack democratic institutions; instead, they claim that they are fighting to institute true democracy. They dont admit a wish to overstep the boundaries of the powers accorded to them by any constitution; instead, they say that they are bringing under control hostile institutions that have already done so. And they dont fire subordinates for being unwilling to turn themselves into loyal henchmen; instead, they make up flimsy cover stories that blame forced resignations on invented or exaggerated failings.
The nations trust in the rule of law, already seriously damaged, depends on the job of one single individual.
Donald Trump seems to be mastering this playbook more and more effectively. During his first months in office, the White House was engulfed in chaos. Now, he is succeeding in portraying unprecedented attacks on independent institutions, like the FBI and the Department of Justice, as mere partisan squabbles between Democrats and Republicans. At first, Trump threatened to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in an open attempt to shut down the Russia investigation. Now, he is purging the law enforcement community of nonpartisan professionals by seizing upon their supposed wrongdoings.
The brilliant manner in which the administration has undermined Rod Rosensteins position is only the latest example of what political scientists call authoritarian learning. It is possible that the deputy attorney general really did act foolishly, seriously discussing the possibilities of wearing a wire to incriminate the president, of removing him from office by invoking the 25th Amendment. It seems rather more likely that he made those comments in a sarcastic mannerand that the administration leaked his alleged remarks to the New York Times to create a sliver of justifiability if it should decide to oust him.
snip - more to read.
Adding last paragraph
From the perspective of Russia, Turkey, or Venezuela, this all looks spookily familiar. All serious political scientists agree that democratically elected leaders have, over a period of five or 10 or 15 years, destroyed those countries democratic institutions. But if you asked them about the particular moment in which Vladimir Putin (or Recep Tayyip Erdogan or Hugo Chavez) first became a dictator, they would likely give wildly differing answers. If Trump should actually manage to destroy the rule of the law in the United States, there is no reason to think the moment in which he succeeds will be any more obvious. Not in retrospectand even less so at the time.