Did anyone bother to tell Rachel Mitchell that she's supposed to be on the GOP's side?

and she shifts gears the next go-around to go on the attack.

And she's trying to ask those questions in the five minutes that would have been allotted to them. But having an outside person do it just ends up sounding disjointed and of little effect.

I would LOVE to know what Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham are thinking right now.

I think that bringing in Ms. Mitchell to do the questioning will go down as one of the all-time stupidest, most impactful blunder in Committee history. People all over the country are watching a calm rational female walking a very credible, sympathetic witness through extremely difficult testimony - and not doing a thing to shake her believability or dignity. Not what the Grassley and the boys had in mind.

But then since she is acting as if she is prosecuting, she might have dumped some of the most egregious questions.

IMHO, I think "the guys" are wishing this nightmare were over but too bad. Someone posted that Drumpf is having a fit.

The only thing that Mitchell has accomplished is make Dr. Ford demonstrate how sincere and believable she is.

But Ms. Mitchell may be letting her professionalism get ahead of her partisanship. That would be a very bad development for Judge Kreepazoid.

She's being completely neutral, which, in theory, she should be.

But in her defense she is on a fool’s errand. The witness is compelling and convincing.

is Jeanine Pirro available?

Paint the victim as politically motivated and not trustworthy.

I'm guessing she knows the Republicans are going to crash and burm. and she wants to be able to say she kept the interview professional.

I can’t watch them much butvwhen they can’t spin you know you’ve got something.