E-mails Show That Republican Senate Staff Stymied a Kavanaugh Accuser's Effort to Give Testimony
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/e-mails-show-republican-senate-staff-stymied-a-kavanaugh-accusers-effort-to-give-testimony
Throughout Thursdays Senate hearing on Christine Blasey Fords sexual-misconduct allegation against Brett Kavanaugh, Republicans on the Judiciary Committee claimed that they had tried in vain to secure more information about other accusations made about the judge. We were moving heaven and earth and even moving the schedule to get to the truth, Senator Thom Tillis, of North Carolina, said. Every opportunity you have to go and question a witness, every opportunity that weve had to find more truth and to find more facts, we have done it. Senator Chuck Grassley, of Iowa, the chairman of the committee, said, about an allegation of sexual misconduct raised last week by a former college classmate of Kavanaughs, Deborah Ramirez, My staff made eight requestsyes, eight requestsfor evidence from attorneys for Ms. .?.?. Ms. Ramirez. He added, The committee cant do an investigation if attorneys are stonewalling.
On Wednesday, several conservative-media outlets published leaks of some of the e-mail correspondence between Ramirezs team and Republican committee staffers, which appeared to back up Grassleys characterization. But a fuller copy of the e-mail correspondence between Ramirezs legal team and Republican and Democratic Senate staffers shows that a Republican aide declined to proceed with telephone calls and instead repeatedly demanded that Ramirez produce additional evidence in written form. Only then could any conversation about her testimony proceed. The exchange culminated in a breakdown of communication between the two sides, as Republican and Democratic staffers traded accusations of stonewalling.
The e-mails show that Mike Davis, a senior Republican committee staffer, approached Ramirezs attorneys on Sunday evening, shortly after The New Yorker published a piece about Senate Democrats investigating her allegation of sexual misconduct by Kavanaugh during their college years. Ramirez told The New Yorker that Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away. Kavanaugh has repeatedly said that the allegations are false.
From the start, Ramirezs legal team had called for the F.B.I. to conduct an investigation. Her attorney John Clune told Davis that Ramirez was seeking an F.B.I. investigation and said that, on appropriate terms, she would also agree to be interviewed in person. But when Clune proposed a phone call several times, Davis repeatedly insisted that Clune answer two questions: Did Ramirez possess evidence in addition to what was in the New Yorker article? And was she willing to provide testimony to the committees investigators?
(end snip)