General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf Kavanaugh believes Democrats have conspired against him, how can he stand in judgment of issues
...that come before his court, without bias or a desire for recrimination?
It's obviously not a benign view of Kavanaugh's, given that it's absolutely looney and disassociated from ANY facts in this matter. How can he effectively and credibly sit on the highest court in the nation and rule without the animus he demonstrated in the hearing yesterday?
Judge KIavanaugh irrevocably tainted his judgement from the bench when he lashed out at Democrats in such a bizarre and vehemently biased manner. He should be impeached, right now, and disbarred for his dishonest attacks on the democratic process - the process he relied on to get where he is today.
Thrill
(19,178 posts)Or voting for third parties. Biggest evidence ever that elections have consequences
SHRED
(28,136 posts)He's twisted and will make a mockery of the court.
bigtree
(85,977 posts)...I agree that he has some sort of mental disorder which is a manic combination of self-importance and lack of empathy.
He looked very unstable, and even violent.
Grasswire2
(13,565 posts)Watch the parts where he is incoherent and just stops talking. Looks like a drinker on the bar stool. Face all twisted, crying, sniffing back the snot running from his nose. He didn't pull out a handkerchief until it was all over, despite his prep school manners class. Toward the end, he looked dazed.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,608 posts)(a) he hasn't actually been confirmed yet, and (b) there aren't enough votes to impeach, let alone convict him. Where are those 67 Senators going to come from?
If he's disbarred (which would be a decision by the licensing agency of the state in which he holds a law license), it doesn't matter because you don't need a law license to be on the Supreme Court.
uponit7771
(90,304 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,608 posts)Majority of the House to impeach, 2/3 of the Senate to convict and remove from office - specifically Article I, Sec. 3. Also, the Chief Justice presides over the trial in the Senate.
bigtree
(85,977 posts)...and I don't have any expectation at all that this republican party will do anything but massage him.
Is there something wrong with wanting these things? Something wrong with expecting our judges to be held accountable?
I really don't need you or anyone else to tell me what the republican party will do. I'd like, on occasion, to state what I believe without it being projected into some kind of cynicism. That's probably unrealistic too, huh?
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,608 posts)That's not being cynical, just realistic.
Response to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #9)
bigtree This message was self-deleted by its author.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,608 posts)just stating how the procedure works. If you interpreted that as cynical, I can't help it but I'm sorry you feel that way. It wasn't my intent.
procon
(15,805 posts)rage, but then he devolved into a weepy pity party. He seemed to be basing at least some of his grievances on popular rightwing conspiracy theories and repeating the unsubstantiated commentary from the celebrity talk show personalities who earn a very comfy income making up farfetched opinions on Fox News. Which brings up his partisan TV interview on the same channel where he again sided with Republicans and repeated their talking points to continue to bash Democrats.
Kavanaugh's party biases and his clear prejudices against all things relating to the Democratic Party, does not show him to be an impartial, dispassionate and fair minded judge. On the high court, he will have his revenge in ruling on cases that involve Dems and their policies and the causes then support, siding with Republicans to change the face of this country.
dalton99a
(81,404 posts)-Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii
Grasswire2
(13,565 posts)The ones deployed by Richard Mellon Scaife during the Clinton presidency. Groomed and armed with bitter vitriol. Coulter, Drudge, Ingraham, Kellyanne.....that bunch. They are still in the plot. I even saw Jonah Goldberg on CNN the other day.
dalton99a
(81,404 posts)who happens to be a perfect protector for Trump
That's it. They couldn't care less about his crimes
Grasswire2
(13,565 posts)As is a compromised coroner.
Malleable and blackmailable.
Wounded Bear
(58,604 posts)bigtree
(85,977 posts)JohnnyRingo
(18,619 posts)He's at a point now where he has to perjure himself further or admit to prior perjury. He was adamant about it too, literally saying at one time "I swear to God...".
Everything Trump touches gets pulled into the swamp. Jeff Sessions could still be enjoying a lifetime in the senate, but he accepted Trump's offer for the big time. Many others in his cabinet have seen similar career ending fates. see Scott Pruitt.
Brett Kavenaugh will be lucky to get a job writing living wills after this. He may even have to earn money for prison apple jack by giving legal advice.
joet67
(624 posts)He is there to cement to conservative view of the court for decades. He is utterly partisan.
Demovictory9
(32,423 posts)women, people of color, libs.
dlk
(11,514 posts)Prior to being on the bench, Kavanaugh was a partisan warrior and operative for the extreme right. This, alone, should disqualify him.
Novembrist
(35 posts)"Yeah, yeah, I'll be there to cast my vote on indicting Obama and Hillary as soon as I finish this Coors Light!"
Calista241
(5,586 posts)And nobody can say shit. If pressed, hell probably say it was just the Dems on the committee.
However, a SC Justice, like the President, can only be removed from office for high crimes and misdemeanors. They cant just remove him because hes an asshole, or because they feel like it. Theyll have to come up with a real, legal reason to boot him off the court.
marieo1
(1,402 posts)Typical alcoholic...........don't take any blame for your own actions!!! Blame democrats, the wife, circumstances, the gals that came forward, other people..........anyone but don't take any blame yourself. They are never at fault and will deny, deny, deny. I think DJT is another one!!! We need the facts!!!
Zambero
(8,962 posts)Naturally, as a recent SCOTUS nominee, he would have absolutely no reason to believe that the same Republicans had conspired against him!
Scarsdale
(9,426 posts)when Al Gore was winning in Florida. Roger Stone took a planeload of young repubs. down there, to protest the recount. Would not allow it. The decision was handed to the SC. Sandra Day O'Connor was the deciding vote, and voted for Dubya. Her reason? "I have known the elder Bush's for many years, and did not want to see them disappointed"!!! How's THAT for a well thought out judicial decision? Why did they bother voting on this, when it was a foregone conclusion that the (D) would vote for Gore, and the majority (R)'s would vote for Dubya? Has anything changed, because we are royally screwed even without Kavenaugh getting onto the SC. He would be the deciding vote for the (R)'s which is exactly what tRump wants.