General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI Apologize For Previous Thread "Lay Off Joe Manchin"
I originally thought that Schumer allowing his vulnerable to vote to protect the seat, not an uncommon occurrence, is justifiable. Not in this case. In this case principle is supreme, and the idea that Manchin parroted right wing talking points should give us all serious pause as to whether he actually will stay in the party.
More importantly the notion of Dr. Ford being confused is an affront to her and literally the defense of every predator known to personkind. I had not confirmed that he said what he said, but even still I should have set aside my instinct for political business long enough to realize there is good and evil and this kind of evil renders any electoral victory meaningless.
I am sorry. There is no scenario where an endorsement of this man is ok. It is a litmus test that Joe failed as a Democrat, and more importantly, as a human being.
I refuse to be such a failure. Today I am sick to my stomach. I am angry. I have had my faith shaken in any institution in this country. But my only chance to partner and help defeat this tyranny is only if I retain faith in myself. Winning is vital, yes, however so is laying the groundwork for a permanent ethical, empathetic, accepting, and progressive majority.
We must remember the foundation of such road is moral authority.

Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)This is about principle. This is about what kind of country we will tolerate. Manchin will move on to make millions in the lobbyist industry some day. Where will that leave us ?
Jersey Devil
(10,421 posts)If you are talking about his supposed comment that Ford was "confused", that was pure bullshit. He never said any such thing.
JonLP24
(29,697 posts)It looks like they were in Washington DC and may have heard something that wasn't picked up by cameras. Every comment in that thread including the tweet was addressed to Joe Manchin so plenty of opportunity for his staff to deny.
LAS14
(15,271 posts)... trumps (sic) having one Dem senator say the right things.
still_one
(98,883 posts)Response to Stare Decisis (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Me.
(35,454 posts)which frankly I hate....but is quite another to tell a woman who was afraid she was going to be killed by her attacker that she was confused. Disgraceful and despicable. But then I don't think I have had any positive expectations from a man whose big pharma daughter raised the price of EPI pens to such a degree that people who needed them couldn't afford them. Apple and Tree.
still_one
(98,883 posts)over to the republican party right before the midterms serves absolutely no purpose, and hurts us.
We really need to start thinking with our minds and not our emotions. This should be done on OUR terms, not on terms that would provide even more advantage to the republicans.
While this may provide a cathartic experience, usually cutting one's nose off to spite one's face only hurts the party without the nose.
As someone mentioned below if there is even a slight chance that we may obtain the majority in the Senate in 2016, that is a big deal, and we should not ignore that possibility
When the midterms are over there will be time enough for us debate and strategize among ourselves on people like Manchin, but doing it just before the midterms plays right into the republican playbook, and we really don't want that
peggysue2
(12,020 posts)The Republicans are no doubt drooling over the prospect that Dems will initiate a circular firing squad a month before the most consequential election of our lifetimes. No one has to approve of Manchin's vote or comments in the moment. Nor those of Phil Bredesen in Tennessee. But to turn on our own candidates now is shortsighted and counterproductive.
That is if we truly wish to win in November and curtail the Trumpster's worst instincts.
The Kavanaugh affair has been infuriating and depressing. But neither Manchin's vote nor Bredesen's comment to support Kav would change the ultimate outcome. That dubious honor was bestowed on Susan Collins and she failed spectacularly after riding the fence for 2 weeks.
If we are adamant about changing the dynamic then we turn this around with a massive Blue Vote on November 6th. Straight Democratic, no exceptions.
Anything less plays right into the Republican playbook. Divide and conquer. Works every time!
Me.
(35,454 posts)While we need him, we will need him but we may have other avenues come November. Currently, 3 longshot senate races have all three DEms with the edge.
Sinema in Arizona
Beto in Texas
Rosen in Nevada
If these three make it, we may have a whole new ball game.
peggysue2
(12,020 posts)are we willing to roll the dice if the candidates you list fall short?
Personally, I'm not.
Manchin has always been a bone of contention. The time to oppose him was during the primary not a month before a general election where our survival as a country hangs in the balance.
Now, it's all hands on deck supporting, promoting, winning everywhere we can. We simply don't have the luxury to do otherwise.
still_one
(98,883 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)I was surprised today, upon checking to see all three in the lead, however slightly
still_one
(98,883 posts)Maraya1969
(23,304 posts)conspiratorial, has a bad temperament, is a gambler, a bad drinker and believes that the president does not have to be responsible for any crimes.
That is what Joe Manchin did. I say he goes. If he has to lower himself to pond scum to try and get votes like the republicans do then get the hell out of the Democratic party because we have morals.
yardwork
(67,148 posts)Democrats in West Virginia have a moral obligation to vote for Manchin.
If the Democratic Party can retake the Senate, then we control the process. Democrats would chair the committees and have majority vote on the committees. The committees decide everything. The party that holds the majority decides what bills get discussed and what bills get voted on to become laws. Committees decide whether to open investigations.
It's not about the individual votes. It's about controlling the process. Vote for Machin and every Democrat in sight, for all seats, at the local, state, and federal levels.
It's our last chance. Our democracy depends on Democrats regaining the majority in Congress.
Jake Stern
(3,146 posts)When Manchin votes "Yea" for a full on white supremacist or a torturer or an ultra conservative Christian fundamentalist who thinks gays and atheists should be denied civil rights?
All of whom would likely poll very well in West Virginia.
When do we stop selling our soul for seats?
yardwork
(67,148 posts)Jake Stern
(3,146 posts)The excuses for Joe flipping sexual assault survivors the middle finger are bullshit in light of senators like McCaskill, Heitkamp and Donnelly, all in extremely tight re-election races in bright red states, having the courage to vote no.
wellst0nev0ter
(7,509 posts)where the state senate has a Dem majority, but Republicans control it because a bunch of dems caucus with the pukes
This is what happens when you give blue dogs a long leash.
BumRushDaShow
(156,446 posts)"post removed" that targeted a Democrat in a similar fashion.
There is a difference between criticism and outward refusal to support a Democrat.
Stare Decisis
(229 posts)Truth is an affirmative defense.
BumRushDaShow
(156,446 posts)in that particular "post removed" thread to argue what I needed to argue but discovered at the time of hitting "post my reply" that it had been locked. The poster (a long time one at that) literally went on a suicide run with that one.
On DU, it's not a matter of "truth" as it is a matter of the TOS. I think most agree with what you wrote (me included) but posting it here with the TOS as it is written, often won't fly.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)I hope that they resign enmass and one of them sign up for the 2024 West Virginia democratic primary. The only downside is that a democratic President likely would have corrected a lot of Trump's mess in WV and Manchin will be able to hide behind that President to fend off the challenge, but I hope women of WV remember.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)noise about how we should all get excited about other candidates like Sharice Davids, but that makes sense because there was a candidate in that race being supported by Sanders, but too many people here thought it was a bad idea to primary Manchin. We needed the Manchin's of the party, you know, for moments like this.
I don't remember Emily's List getting out there and endorsing Paula Jean Sweringin and giving her visibility, although they absolutley have endorsed primary challengers in the past. Nope. As a party, we've been complicit here.
Gothmog
(166,210 posts)Committee. I do not want Lindsey Graham to be the chair of the Judiciary Committee
bronxiteforever
(10,613 posts)Because that is the choice.