Fri Oct 12, 2018, 03:02 PM

Public Comment on Changes to Demonstrations at WH and National Mall by Oct. 15

Last edited Fri Oct 12, 2018, 03:38 PM - Edit history (1)

You can read the proposal here and click the "Comment Now" tab to leave your opinion:

[link:http://|http://www.regulations.gov/document?D=NPS-2018-0007-0001]

From ACLU:

"The Trump administration is proposing to dramatically limit the right to demonstrate near the White House and on the National Mall. The proposed rule changes were made by the National Park Service, which administers the areas. The proposal, which threatens First Amendment rights, would close 80 percent of the White House sidewalk, put new limits on spontaneous demonstrations, and open the door to charging fees for protesting."

[link:www.aclu.org/letter/aclu-public-comment-opposing-trump-administration-proposal-restrict-protest-rights-washington?redirect=nps-protest-public-comment|

11 replies, 1853 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

11 replies	Author	Time	Post
Public Comment on Changes to Demonstrations at WH and National Mall by Oct. 15 (Original post)	nature-lover	Oct 2018	OP
I left a comment. Thank you for making it easy!	Squinch	Oct 2018	#1
You are welcome. It took some effort to find it.	nature-lover	Oct 2018	#2
Thank you for the link!	SunSeeker	Oct 2018	#3
I suggested as a cost saving measure they could eliminate events such as the national tree lighting	Fresh_Start	Oct 2018	#4
It's not your house, it's not your lawn, Mr. Trump.	hunter	Oct 2018	#5
K&R nt	backtoblue	Oct 2018	#6
My comment was short and sweet: "Opposed. Suggest you read the Constitution."	Vinca	Oct 2018	#7
Here's my comment:	Tom Rinaldo	Oct 2018	#8
The proposed rule was published on August, 15. Why so long to hear about it?	nature-lover	Oct 2018	#9
Thank you for the link.	Lonestarblue	Oct 2018	#10
Thanks a lot.	mobeau69	Oct 2018	#11

Response to nature-lover (Original post)

Fri Oct 12, 2018, 03:08 PM

Squinch (46,313 posts)

1. I left a comment. Thank you for making it easy!

Reply to this post

Response to Squinch (Reply #1)

Fri Oct 12, 2018, 03:09 PM

nature-lover (1,254 posts)

2. You are welcome. It took some effort to find it.

Reply to this post

Response to nature-lover (Original post)

Fri Oct 12, 2018, 03:40 PM

SunSeeker (48,682 posts)

3. Thank you for the link!

Hope everyone posts how wrong these 1st Amendment restrictions are!

Reply to this post

Response to nature-lover (Original post)

Fri Oct 12, 2018, 03:56 PM

Fresh_Start (11,324 posts)

4. I suggested as a cost saving measure they could eliminate events such as the national tree lighting

event versus restricting first amendment rights of citizens due to cost considerations

Reply to this post

Response to nature-lover (Original post)

Fri Oct 12, 2018, 04:20 PM

hunter (36,395 posts)

5. It's not your house, it's not your lawn, Mr. Trump.

You are a tenant, and most of us, the owners of this place, are looking forward to the day you leave.

Reply to this post

Response to nature-lover (Original post)

Fri Oct 12, 2018, 04:45 PM

backtoblue (10,910 posts)

6. K&R nt

Reply to this post

Response to nature-lover (Original post)

Fri Oct 12, 2018, 04:49 PM

Vinca (49,019 posts)

7. My comment was short and sweet: "Opposed. Suggest you read the Constitution."

Reply to this post

Response to nature-lover (Original post)

Fri Oct 12, 2018, 05:08 PM

Tom Rinaldo (22,556 posts)

8. Here's my comment:

Charging money for protesting? That sounds a lot like charging a poll tax for voting. We live in a free Democracy, except for the "free" part I guess. What's next, privatizing citizenship? All the rights that money can buy...

Reply to this post

Response to nature-lover (Original post)

Fri Oct 12, 2018, 05:34 PM

nature-lover (1,254 posts)