Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMUST-READ, ThinkProgress: This 2014 interview of Trump's acting attorney general is beyond belief
https://thinkprogress.org/matthew-whitaker-grotesque-incoherent-ab07fbb09c84/In a 2014 interview, the man Donald Trump just picked to run the Department of Justice appeared to claim that Social Security is unconstitutional and that basic labor laws like the minimum wage must be struck down. Yet he also seemed to argue that the Supreme Court should not decide constitutional cases at all.
The interview reveals that Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker is easily taken in by conspiracy theories he claims he was quite possibly targeted for my political beliefs via the IRS. Whitaker launches into a Trumpian rant against chain immigration and people trying to bring illegal people and illegal drugs into our country. He claims that climate change doesnt appear to be that significant or quite possibly isnt man made, and calls for the Department of Education to be disbanded.
But the most revealing part of the interview, which was published by the conservative blog Caffeinated Thoughts while Whitaker was a candidate for the United States Senate, is a paragraph where Whitaker lays out his incoherent understanding of the Constitution. At best, this paragraph suggests that the man running the Justice Department does not understand some very basic legal concepts. At worst, it indicates that he has a disorganized mind that is unable to keep track of what he said just a few seconds ago.
-snip-
Whitakers rant against both Marbury and the Roosevelt Era decisions upholding the New Deal echo the lunatic fringes of both conservative critics of judicial review and conservative proponents of judicial engagement. Whitaker is simultaneously tossing red meat to wild-eyed radicals who think that courts should be stripped of the power of judicial review, while also tossing red meat to a different set of radicals who believe that the Supreme Courts right flank should turn judicial review up to eleven.
Its unclear whether Whitaker is a cynic or a fool. That is, it is genuinely difficult to tell whether the former candidate understood that he was expressing two mutually contradictory viewpoints, or whether he was just echoing words that he does not comprehend, but that he probably heard somewhere from other conservative lawyers.
Either option, however, paints him as unfit to lead the Justice Department. Either Whitaker is a man of no conviction beyond the right should always win, or he lacks the knowledge and intellectual capacity to do his job.
The interview reveals that Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker is easily taken in by conspiracy theories he claims he was quite possibly targeted for my political beliefs via the IRS. Whitaker launches into a Trumpian rant against chain immigration and people trying to bring illegal people and illegal drugs into our country. He claims that climate change doesnt appear to be that significant or quite possibly isnt man made, and calls for the Department of Education to be disbanded.
But the most revealing part of the interview, which was published by the conservative blog Caffeinated Thoughts while Whitaker was a candidate for the United States Senate, is a paragraph where Whitaker lays out his incoherent understanding of the Constitution. At best, this paragraph suggests that the man running the Justice Department does not understand some very basic legal concepts. At worst, it indicates that he has a disorganized mind that is unable to keep track of what he said just a few seconds ago.
-snip-
Whitakers rant against both Marbury and the Roosevelt Era decisions upholding the New Deal echo the lunatic fringes of both conservative critics of judicial review and conservative proponents of judicial engagement. Whitaker is simultaneously tossing red meat to wild-eyed radicals who think that courts should be stripped of the power of judicial review, while also tossing red meat to a different set of radicals who believe that the Supreme Courts right flank should turn judicial review up to eleven.
Its unclear whether Whitaker is a cynic or a fool. That is, it is genuinely difficult to tell whether the former candidate understood that he was expressing two mutually contradictory viewpoints, or whether he was just echoing words that he does not comprehend, but that he probably heard somewhere from other conservative lawyers.
Either option, however, paints him as unfit to lead the Justice Department. Either Whitaker is a man of no conviction beyond the right should always win, or he lacks the knowledge and intellectual capacity to do his job.
Full interview, published in 2014, here:
https://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2014/05/iowa-u-s-senate-candidate-profile-qa-matt-whitaker/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 635 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MUST-READ, ThinkProgress: This 2014 interview of Trump's acting attorney general is beyond belief (Original Post)
highplainsdem
Nov 2018
OP
aquamarina
(1,865 posts)1. Sounds like he got his JD at Trump U
highplainsdem
(48,910 posts)2. Sure does.