Hold on about Whitaker. His appointment may be illegal? AND

[allgood33]

remember this. Whitaker has not seen, and does not know the evidence that Mueller has. Now behaving a certain way BEFORE he knows the actual evidence and facts is one thing. BUT once he is briefed and finds out the actual facts and evidence, taking the same actions positions him to be charged with obstructing justice, doesn't it? Am i wrong?

[rzemanfl]

1. I think he will be like Drumpf and refuse to be briefed.

If he thinks it's a "witch hunt" why would he read the flight logs of the brooms? He is a total POS.

[Ilsa]

2. Plus, he isn't qualified to be there.

His last gig was with a patents company tbat went bankrupt and had to pay a huge fine for fraud.He's scum.

[Xipe Totec]

3. Yes, you are wrong.

People who pontificate before having the facts are incapable of revising opinions once the facts are known. It would make them look stupid and that's something they don't like.

They'd rather be wrong than humiliated.