Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
89 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A woman led Dems back to the majority in the House.... (Original Post) hlthe2b Nov 2018 OP
Yep mcar Nov 2018 #1
A whole lot of women led us back to majority randr Nov 2018 #2
Oh you know it's coming.... "just not that woman".... MrsCoffee Nov 2018 #3
Yes. Wintryjade Nov 2018 #5
Even our own Party has some self-serving idiots and fools in it. It just makes me tired. nt Hekate Nov 2018 #4
Yes. Wintryjade Nov 2018 #6
Yes, and I am really tired of it too. Way too many of them! justhanginon Nov 2018 #25
And tons of women will be PO'd BIG TIME apcalc Nov 2018 #7
Post removed Post removed Nov 2018 #8
Huh? Are you talking to me? apcalc Nov 2018 #15
2 young women if Pressley is counted. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #16
What? Who is Pressley? apcalc Nov 2018 #20
She also beat an older incumbent in Massachusetts. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #27
I have never attacked a "young woman who replaced an old white guy" NEVER NEVER NEVER hlthe2b Nov 2018 #17
You said you were incensed by her actions. Equated it to kicking Nancy in the face. Kaleva Nov 2018 #21
It WAS concern whether you and your determination to attack me & others who disagree with you with hlthe2b Nov 2018 #23
No, the voters led the Party. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #9
To not realize how potent and strong Pelosi has been is to not realize that all that has happened hlthe2b Nov 2018 #11
I am not questioning Pelosi's strength, or her commitment. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #14
She must bring on the next generation in leadership, but that does not mean abandoning hlthe2b Nov 2018 #18
And when does this "bringing on" result in new faces? guillaumeb Nov 2018 #26
At no time have we ever not needed experience more. She should remain as leader and bring on new hlthe2b Nov 2018 #29
I respect your arguments, guillaumeb Nov 2018 #30
I don't disagree with that latter point at all. hlthe2b Nov 2018 #31
And a good day to you. eom guillaumeb Nov 2018 #33
I agree, our older generations have brought the planet to the brink. Autumn Nov 2018 #56
And we can still offer advice, guillaumeb Nov 2018 #59
Yes we can offer advice, but it's their time. I'm fine with elders taking a back seat. Autumn Nov 2018 #62
Bernie is the same age as Pelosi. Does he have to take R B Garr Nov 2018 #79
Broad brush for it being the fault of the older generation. erronis Nov 2018 #77
You've got to be kidding...?? Ever hear of Al Gore? R B Garr Nov 2018 #81
Pelosi is the same age as Bernie. R B Garr Nov 2018 #74
I mentioned him as well in another thread. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #85
+1000 Power 2 the People Nov 2018 #24
Nice shirt. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #28
What Progressive message? The one that sounded exactly like the Democratic Message, you mean? Bfd Nov 2018 #57
Medicare for all, guillaumeb Nov 2018 #61
Omg. Yes the Democratic message Bfd Nov 2018 #73
Nancy had a big part in Making our BLUE WAVE A REALI TY.. Cha Nov 2018 #60
Is there something Charles Schumer should Eric J in MN Nov 2018 #10
That it is not EVEN being asked is the issue. Don't pretend you don't get it. hlthe2b Nov 2018 #12
I can't tell you how disgusted I am with Perlmutter eleny Nov 2018 #45
me too, but it sounds like he may be getting heat--I believe I read that he'd softened his hlthe2b Nov 2018 #46
Oh, I believe you about what you read eleny Nov 2018 #50
Good on you! hlthe2b Nov 2018 #53
Thanks! It'll be just a few choice words from an "ole lady" eleny Nov 2018 #54
I like Pelosi just fine PoorMonger Nov 2018 #13
dont underestimate the anti pelosi crowd and what they might do. nt msongs Nov 2018 #19
They won't vote for a Republican PoorMonger Nov 2018 #32
Voting for other DEMS who can't get a majority or abstaining could result in hlthe2b Nov 2018 #34
It doesn't work like that. PoorMonger Nov 2018 #43
Indeed it CAN hlthe2b Nov 2018 #44
Again in this scenario PoorMonger Nov 2018 #65
If they miscalculated in abstaining... hlthe2b Nov 2018 #68
Yes.. and the scenario COULD play out in January... hlthe2b Nov 2018 #22
Are you serious? Newland56 Nov 2018 #35
Not what I said at all. hlthe2b Nov 2018 #38
Confused Newland56 Nov 2018 #41
I think Schumer should be replaced, too. Actually I would put that above Pelosi for priority Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2018 #36
Diversity yes, but there are still plenty of white Democrats. LBM20 Nov 2018 #49
Also, what exactly did Pelosi do to win those elections that took the House back? Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2018 #37
In my district, a woman led us to a victory. But it wasn't Nancy Pelosi. progressoid Nov 2018 #42
Not directly, but she helped make it possible , whether you want to credit her or not. hlthe2b Nov 2018 #69
'Helped' is not the same as 'led'. progressoid Nov 2018 #86
She ABSOUTELY HAS led the way for women in Politics. NO GD DOUBT! hlthe2b Nov 2018 #87
She raised a shitload of money-- directly soliciting money and also participating in fundraisers-- deurbano Nov 2018 #89
Uh, WTF? progressoid Nov 2018 #39
In January if Dems abstain or split the D vote, Kevin McCarthy could win the speakership. hlthe2b Nov 2018 #40
Sure. And we could theoretically nominate someone from the Whig party to be Speaker. progressoid Nov 2018 #47
I said it was possible and I proved why. hlthe2b Nov 2018 #51
If the D vote is split PoorMonger Nov 2018 #72
I said absentions. So, yes it is possible hlthe2b Nov 2018 #76
It was not just one woman. It was hundreds of candidates, volunteers, paid staff... LBM20 Nov 2018 #48
I never said she was the only one. Credit her where credit is due. hlthe2b Nov 2018 #55
And I was yelled at for proudly saying I am a Democrat and I was called BULLSHIT for saying so Eliot Rosewater Nov 2018 #52
Really? On this Forum? hlthe2b Nov 2018 #58
Oh yes Eliot Rosewater Nov 2018 #63
I don't understand. why would they go after you for being a "proud Democrat" hlthe2b Nov 2018 #66
Guess so...ALL I said was I support her and that I am a Democrat. Eliot Rosewater Nov 2018 #75
hmmmm. hlthe2b Nov 2018 #78
Many categories, of course. 25 years of non stop lies and propaganda about her Eliot Rosewater Nov 2018 #80
It sure does and those who won't credit Pelosi with any accomplishments likewise won't HRC. hlthe2b Nov 2018 #88
Make new friends but sagesnow Nov 2018 #64
This message was self-deleted by its author Prof.Higgins Nov 2018 #82
Chuck Schumer loses Democratic Senate seats, is easily re-elected as Senate Minority Leader. Cha Nov 2018 #67
This message was self-deleted by its author Prof.Higgins Nov 2018 #83
Gleeful Chuck Todd fallaciously claims House leadership thwarts change voters wanted. nt Prof.Higgins Nov 2018 #70
Everything in the Media with Pelosi's name in it currently is a RW talking point pecosbob Nov 2018 #71
Are you serious? REALLY? How did that happen? I thought women were inferior to men.... George II Nov 2018 #84

randr

(12,482 posts)
2. A whole lot of women led us back to majority
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 02:45 PM
Nov 2018

And it would not have happened without Nancy leading the way.

Response to hlthe2b (Original post)

apcalc

(4,518 posts)
20. What? Who is Pressley?
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 03:02 PM
Nov 2018

Show me the quotes. You are TOTALLY making this up. You a troll or something?

hlthe2b

(106,476 posts)
17. I have never attacked a "young woman who replaced an old white guy" NEVER NEVER NEVER
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 02:59 PM
Nov 2018

Shame on you.

I have expressed support for the new congresswoman but concern that she is not taking the opportunity to learn from others. All the while expressing my hope for her success.

Shame on you for lying about me.

Kaleva

(38,250 posts)
21. You said you were incensed by her actions. Equated it to kicking Nancy in the face.
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 03:04 PM
Nov 2018

Doesn't sound like "concern' to me.

hlthe2b

(106,476 posts)
23. It WAS concern whether you and your determination to attack me & others who disagree with you with
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 03:06 PM
Nov 2018

such strawman arguments and misrepresentation wants to admit so or not.

Criticism is NOT attacking. No matter how much you want to attack others and make it so.


I would hope you would cease stalking me on these threads.

hlthe2b

(106,476 posts)
11. To not realize how potent and strong Pelosi has been is to not realize that all that has happened
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 02:55 PM
Nov 2018

WOULD not have happened.

Those who fail to appreciate the fights that women have made-- before the AOC's and the other successful women going to Congress -- and how that paved the way are just blinded, ungrateful, and foolish. Foolish? yes, because they are unlikely to learn what they NEED to learn from the experiences of those who came before them.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
14. I am not questioning Pelosi's strength, or her commitment.
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 02:58 PM
Nov 2018

But at a certain point, the older generation, my generation, must take a back seat and serve as advisors.

hlthe2b

(106,476 posts)
18. She must bring on the next generation in leadership, but that does not mean abandoning
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 03:01 PM
Nov 2018

the leadership role and her much needed experience. To say otherwise is approaching an ugly ageism argument, IMO.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
26. And when does this "bringing on" result in new faces?
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 03:24 PM
Nov 2018

She still could have a role, as could Sanders, as an advisor.

hlthe2b

(106,476 posts)
29. At no time have we ever not needed experience more. She should remain as leader and bring on new
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 03:29 PM
Nov 2018

faces, mentoring (just as it appears she is doing with AOC and likely others). There are lots of leadership positions besides Speaker, for heavens sakes.

I appreciate her leadership, which brought us Obamacare against the odds (and yes, that was largely due to Pelosi). I also LOVE that she drives Trump and the RW nuts. Keeping them off guard, is but one more reason to have her continue.

Not to mention the fact that not ONE person has stepped forward to run against her, (though she has invited others to do so). So, exactly, who is it you support against Pelosi? My money is on her.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
30. I respect your arguments,
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 03:31 PM
Nov 2018

and I do not have anyone to put forward. But that choice belongs to the House Democratic caucus. My point is that the Democrats, and the leadership, must at some point actively promote from the ranks knowing that young blood is the future of the Party.

Autumn

(46,397 posts)
56. I agree, our older generations have brought the planet to the brink.
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 04:56 PM
Nov 2018

A lot of us older people probably won't be around when it all turns to shit. The world belongs to the young and I support them taking charge because the truth is I don't see our older leaders being willing to do what has to be done.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
59. And we can still offer advice,
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 04:59 PM
Nov 2018

and write, and act, and be involved, but the next generation is ready and able to lead just as we were in the 1970's.

erronis

(16,909 posts)
77. Broad brush for it being the fault of the older generation.
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 05:19 PM
Nov 2018

I'm not particularly proud of my efforts to inject rationality into the politics or discourse, but I also think that there has been very conscious and directed interference into US and world relations and politics that is not to be laid at the feet of "older people".

I applaud the enthusiasm and energy of all that fight for liberalism and for the planet. AFAIK, in my part of the world there are a lot of 60+ year-old enthusiasts. And many of us hope to be around for several decades to continue to fight for what's right and to give perspective to the newer ones.

And, of course as we all know, it is always the fault of those that came before us.

R B Garr

(17,380 posts)
81. You've got to be kidding...?? Ever hear of Al Gore?
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 05:28 PM
Nov 2018

He ran for President decades ago, but was rejected because of the “both sides are the same” lies. What revisionist history to misrepresent what our “older” leaders have done and put forth...”being willing to do what has to be done.”

This kind of opposite world is not helpful, especially if young people are being fed this misinformation about Democrats.

 

Bfd

(1,406 posts)
57. What Progressive message? The one that sounded exactly like the Democratic Message, you mean?
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 04:57 PM
Nov 2018

Ya. That message.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
61. Medicare for all,
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 05:00 PM
Nov 2018

a living wage,
free tuition,
the right to organize,
and many other progressive ideas.

 

Bfd

(1,406 posts)
73. Omg. Yes the Democratic message
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 05:17 PM
Nov 2018

The smilarities aren't even debatable.
But they are always negotiable under the Democratic legislature.
What you say is progresive is not exclusive to one nor the other.

Much of what you list was also in Democratic candidate Clinton's policy platform of 2016. And was also in many of the campaign platforms of the Democrats that just handily defeated the Republicans in the recent midterms.

No political group owns exclusive rights to any of them as they are fluid.
Why the need to use these as a point of division. It is simply defeatist.

At a critical time when the Republican Party has decimated so many years of functional policys & laws, hard fought for through legislative efforts of that big grand Democratic Party

Stop with the exclusivity claims & division.

Cha

(305,574 posts)
60. Nancy had a big part in Making our BLUE WAVE A REALI TY..
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 04:59 PM
Nov 2018


Amanpour interviews Congressman-elect Tom Malinowski (D flipped seat that was R since '81)

snip//

I want to play something that maybe speaker, certainly Leader Pelosi said to me in September because a lot of people said well you know what, the Democrats don't really have a message to complete with Make America Great Again.

There's no slogan, there's no clear strategy but this is where she laid out in September.

What we're about in our campaign is that we are for the people, for lower health care costs, lowering prescription drug prices.

We're for raising pay checks, lowering healthcare costs, increasing paychecks by building the infrastructure of America and for cleaning up government to make sure people understand that the people's interest, not the special interests are served here in the United States Capitol.

So there she was laying out a strategy and one that clearly is a winning strategy

https://www.pbs.org/wnet/amanpour-and-company/video/congressman-elect-tom-malinowski/

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=11406195

The Predominate Message was Affordable Health Care.

Eric J in MN

(35,620 posts)
10. Is there something Charles Schumer should
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 02:54 PM
Nov 2018

...have done differently to cause Democrats running for Senate to do better?

eleny

(46,166 posts)
45. I can't tell you how disgusted I am with Perlmutter
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 04:42 PM
Nov 2018

He's one of the crew trying to keep her from being Speaker. I emailed him just now letting him know that if he doesn't change his position we're stopping our monthly support. I'll call the office tomorrow about it, too.

I'm boiling over this because Perlmutter is one of those quiet back benchers but this is the issue that puts him in a spotlight? Grrr....


hlthe2b

(106,476 posts)
46. me too, but it sounds like he may be getting heat--I believe I read that he'd softened his
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 04:45 PM
Nov 2018

opposition to suggest "only if she fails to promote new members to leaderhship positions). Now, I can't find where I read it...

eleny

(46,166 posts)
50. Oh, I believe you about what you read
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 04:52 PM
Nov 2018

And I'm thrilled that he might be feeling the heat. I'll definitely call his local office. In fact, I might go up there since it's about 10 minutes from our house. He's right next to Soopers up in Wheat Ridge on Youngfield. Stopping in might be more impactful, hee-hee!

PoorMonger

(844 posts)
13. I like Pelosi just fine
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 02:57 PM
Nov 2018

However , this person’s big nightmare scenario isn’t how the speakership works.

The parties elect their leaders amongst themselves. The later vote on Speaker comes in January when the new Congress is seated.

That speaker needs a real majority of members - which no Republican could achieve ( because as the majority none of our members would vote for ANY R as speaker

PoorMonger

(844 posts)
32. They won't vote for a Republican
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 03:32 PM
Nov 2018

They might drag out the vote a long time — but you are saying you think that a large chunk of DEMOCRATS would actually elect Kevin McCarthy speaker to get back at Nancy??

That’s not happening. These aren’t a bunch of idiots here. They are elected Dems to believe they would throw away control being petty is ludicrous

hlthe2b

(106,476 posts)
34. Voting for other DEMS who can't get a majority or abstaining could result in
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 03:36 PM
Nov 2018

a Kevin MCCarthy getting the majority of votes. I never said they would vote for a Republican. This could happen by foolish misunderstanding of the process.

PoorMonger

(844 posts)
43. It doesn't work like that.
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 04:35 PM
Nov 2018

You need a real majority of votes in the whole house to win speaker. With a Dem majority the only way a R would win is if Dems vote with Republicans to do it.

hlthe2b

(106,476 posts)
44. Indeed it CAN
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 04:36 PM
Nov 2018
Selection

The House of Representatives elects the Speaker of the House on the first day of every new Congress and in the event of the death, resignation or removal from the Chair of an incumbent Speaker.[8] The Clerk of the House of Representatives requests nominations: there are normally two, one from each major party (each party having previously met to decide on its nominee). The Clerk then calls the roll of the Representatives, each Representative indicating the surname of the candidate the Representative is supporting. Representatives are not restricted to voting for one of the nominated candidates and may vote for any person, even for someone who is not a member of the House at all. They may also abstain by voting "present".[9]

Although no rule exists, based on tradition and practice from the earliest days of the nation, to be elected speaker a candidate must receive an absolute majority of all votes cast for individuals, i.e. excluding those who abstain. If no candidate wins such a majority, then the roll call is repeated until a speaker is elected. The last time repeated votes were required was in 1923, when the Speaker was elected on the ninth ballot.[9]

PoorMonger

(844 posts)
65. Again in this scenario
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 05:04 PM
Nov 2018

Which results in multiple votes ( because nobody achieves a real majority) you think a large chunk of Dems would vote present out of spite and hand power to Republicans?

Never mind the fact that vote counting and support gathering is what the Speaker and Whip do all the time ( before we even arrive at the Speaker vote ) if things are really so dire for Nancy before then she would be the first to know and it would be sorted out before then.

hlthe2b

(106,476 posts)
68. If they miscalculated in abstaining...
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 05:07 PM
Nov 2018

There is time to wisen them up to the process, but the rhetoric right now is disturbing--not just because they want an alternative, but that they clearly don't GET the process, the position, and what is needed for a effective speaker. Obviously this doesn't apply across the board, but for some of the more naive' new members, yes.

Newland56

(74 posts)
35. Are you serious?
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 03:39 PM
Nov 2018

Are you serious that gender of leadership was the deciding factor in senate vs house results?

Personally I think the senate was nearly as big a victory as the house. When the number of seats democrats had to defend is taken into account the small losses in the senate is astounding. In any other midterm we should have lost 6-10 seats in a best case scenario.

While gender equality is important to our party and country, the slight against Schumer because of his gender affecting his leadership ability reflects the same sexism I thought that our party was against. And to use the results only through the lens of gender will most likely harm the party going forward.



hlthe2b

(106,476 posts)
38. Not what I said at all.
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 03:46 PM
Nov 2018

(but then, i sort of think you knew that, didn't you)... I don't do strawman arguments.

Newland56

(74 posts)
41. Confused
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 04:19 PM
Nov 2018

Sorry I got confused
When I read “a woman led the house back to a majority and a man led the senate to a greater minority...”

I thought that was referencing the gender “woman” to the positive house results and the gender “man” to the losses in the senate.

Sorry if I misunderstood the framing in regards to gender and results

Cuthbert Allgood

(5,183 posts)
36. I think Schumer should be replaced, too. Actually I would put that above Pelosi for priority
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 03:41 PM
Nov 2018

We have a problem with old, white people being the politicians when that does not reflect society. Old, white men is an even bigger problem. We need people that look more like the people that vote for them.

Cuthbert Allgood

(5,183 posts)
37. Also, what exactly did Pelosi do to win those elections that took the House back?
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 03:42 PM
Nov 2018

I'd like specifics for specific races.

I'll wait.

progressoid

(50,757 posts)
42. In my district, a woman led us to a victory. But it wasn't Nancy Pelosi.
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 04:19 PM
Nov 2018

It was Cindy Axne. She and her team (including thousands of volunteers like myself) worked their butts off to win.

hlthe2b

(106,476 posts)
87. She ABSOUTELY HAS led the way for women in Politics. NO GD DOUBT!
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 06:48 PM
Nov 2018

I have to question your motivation for not giving her any credit whatsoever. Maybe you are just ill informed or maybe it is something else, but progressives/Democrats owe it to themselves to educate themselves on the history of our party, our leaders, our evolution.

deurbano

(2,957 posts)
89. She raised a shitload of money-- directly soliciting money and also participating in fundraisers--
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 07:00 PM
Nov 2018

as she tirelessly crisscrossed the country. My daughter, a Pelosi-appointed Ca Dem delegate, worked everyday on GOTV for Red to Blue here in SF in the lead up to the election, so I did get a small glimpse behind the scenes, and Nancy Pelosi seemed to be working non-stop and very effectively to ensure this result. I listened into a couple of briefings (sometimes my daughter participated in these at the office, but other times she participated at home, listening to the briefing on speaker phone) as Leader Pelosi was galvanizing the troops, with representatives from different GOTV organizations reporting in from around the country. She funded the San Francisco Red to Blue headquarters, where a gazillion volunteers made countless calls and sent countless texts to GOTV on behalf of candidates like Josh Harder who just flipped CA 10. I don't know how much she raised for each specific race, but I've included a snippet from a CNN piece about the "eye-popping" amount of money she raised for this election cycle. An Atlantic Monthly snippet (below) includes a quote from Politico calling her “the most successful nonpresidential political fundraiser in U.S. history," and a quote from Thomas Mann, who studies Congress at the Brookings Institution, calling her the “strongest and most effective speaker of modern times.”

https://hoodline.com/2018/09/with-election-day-weeks-away-castro-debuts-red-to-blue-office-for-democratic-volunteers

https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/15/politics/nancy-pelosi-fundraising-democrats/index.html
Through June, Pelosi had raised an eye-popping $83 million for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee for the 2018 election cycle, more than double the next closest Democrat, according to an internal list for the group charged with electing more Democrats to the US House of Representatives. A source briefed on the matter said that through July she had raised nearly $91 million for the party committee, which is spending big in hotly contested races including where Democratic candidates are running away from Pelosi.


https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/04/the-nancy-pelosi-problem/554048/
The Nancy Pelosi Problem
The first female speaker of the House has become the most effec­tive congressional leader of modern times—and, not coinciden­tally, the most vilified.
PETER BEINART, APRIL 2018

Last may, The Washington Post’s James Hohmann noted “an uncovered dynamic” that helped explain the GOP’s failure to repeal Obamacare. Three current Democratic House members had opposed the Affordable Care Act when it first passed. Twelve Democratic House members represent districts that Donald Trump won. Yet none voted for repeal. The “uncovered dynamic,” Hohmann suggested, was Nancy Pelosi’s skill at keeping her party in line.

She’s been keeping it in line for more than a decade. In 2005, George W. Bush launched his second presidential term with an aggressive push to partially privatize Social Security. For nine months, Republicans demanded that Democrats admit the retirement system was in crisis and offer their own program to change it. Pelosi refused. Democratic members of Congress hosted more than 1,000 town-hall meetings to rally opposition to privatization. That fall, Republicans backed down, and Bush’s second term never recovered.

In 2009, Pelosi persuaded deficit-wary Blue Dog Democrats to back Barack Obama’s stimulus package, and it passed without a single Republican vote. The following year, when Rahm Emanuel, then the White House chief of staff, suggested scaling back health-care reform after the Democrats’ surprise Senate loss in Massachusetts, Pelosi insisted that Obama maintain his goal of universal coverage. She enraged her pro-choice allies by allowing a vote on an amendment prohibiting women insured through the law’s health-care exchanges from receiving government-subsidized abortions. But that gave antiabortion Democrats cover to support the bill, which passed with nary a Republican vote.

These victories led Thomas Mann, who studies Congress at the Brookings Institution, to call Pelosi the “strongest and most effective speaker of modern times.” And even after being relegated to minority leader when Republicans took the House in 2010, she kept winning legislative fights. In the summer of 2015, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and the Republican Party launched a mammoth lobbying campaign to kill Obama’s nuclear agreement with Iran. Pelosi quickly secured the votes to prevent Republicans from overturning the agreement, thus checkmating the deal’s foes.

In addition to being a masterful legislative tactician, the 77-year-old Pelosi is, in Politico’s words, “the most successful nonpresidential political fundraiser in U.S. history.” ... One might think grassroots Democratic enthusiasm for Pelosi would offset her lack of appeal among Republicans and independents. The party, after all, is moving left, where Pelosi has been all along. She opposed Bill Clinton’s attempt to allow China into the World Trade Organization; she opposed Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, his policy that prevented LGBT Americans from serving openly in the military; she opposed the Iraq War when most of the House Democratic leadership, and almost every Democratic senator running for president, supported it; and she opposed Obama’s push for the fast-track trade authority necessary to finalize the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Yet a September CNN poll found that Democrats were only 11 points more likely to view Pelosi favorably than unfavorably.

Gender scholars would not be surprised. For a 2010 paper in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, the Yale researchers Victoria Brescoll and Tyler Okimoto showed study participants the fictional biographies of two state senators, identical except that one was named John Burr and the other Ann Burr. (I referred to this study in an October 2016 article for this magazine called “Fear of a Female President.”) When quotations were added that described the state senators as “ambitious” and possessing “a strong will to power,” John Burr became more popular. But the changes provoked “moral outrage” toward Ann Burr, whom both men and women became less willing to support....

progressoid

(50,757 posts)
39. Uh, WTF?
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 04:13 PM
Nov 2018
All of these Democrats who will vote against Pelosi, no matter what, FAIL TO UNDERSTAND...

If Kevin McCarthy, the House GOP minority leader, gets MORE total votes than Pelosi...

HE WILL BECOME SPEAKER.

These Dems can lose us the speakership.




hlthe2b

(106,476 posts)
40. In January if Dems abstain or split the D vote, Kevin McCarthy could win the speakership.
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 04:15 PM
Nov 2018

Do some homework. While it is quite unlikely, if there are enough foolish D's that refuse to develop a consensus around a single D Speaker candidate--whoever that might be, or decide abstaining will send a "message" it theoretically could happen.


Selection

The House of Representatives elects the Speaker of the House on the first day of every new Congress and in the event of the death, resignation or removal from the Chair of an incumbent Speaker.[8] The Clerk of the House of Representatives requests nominations: there are normally two, one from each major party (each party having previously met to decide on its nominee). The Clerk then calls the roll of the Representatives, each Representative indicating the surname of the candidate the Representative is supporting. Representatives are not restricted to voting for one of the nominated candidates and may vote for any person, even for someone who is not a member of the House at all. They may also abstain by voting "present".[9]

Although no rule exists, based on tradition and practice from the earliest days of the nation, to be elected speaker a candidate must receive an absolute majority of all votes cast for individuals, i.e. excluding those who abstain. If no candidate wins such a majority, then the roll call is repeated until a speaker is elected. The last time repeated votes were required was in 1923, when the Speaker was elected on the ninth ballot.[9]

hlthe2b

(106,476 posts)
51. I said it was possible and I proved why.
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 04:54 PM
Nov 2018


If those naive' new members who have claimed they would NEVER vote for Pelosi likewise don't understand the process, and abstain to make a point, yes, it could happen.

PoorMonger

(844 posts)
72. If the D vote is split
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 05:13 PM
Nov 2018

And Kevin McCarthy gets every R vote — that isn’t a majority.

That’s another round of voting.

So unless D’s vote for him or consciously decide to tank by voting present as a bloc that can’t occur.

When people vote present it is seen as their small protest vote this is true . But you would need a large number to decide that’s what they wanted to do

Typically the present vote is also something negotiated and accounted for by the speaker ( so as not to fuck it up )

 

LBM20

(1,580 posts)
48. It was not just one woman. It was hundreds of candidates, volunteers, paid staff...
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 04:48 PM
Nov 2018

No offense to her, but I think it's time for a change.

hlthe2b

(106,476 posts)
66. I don't understand. why would they go after you for being a "proud Democrat"
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 05:05 PM
Nov 2018

because of your support of Pelosi?

hlthe2b

(106,476 posts)
78. hmmmm.
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 05:20 PM
Nov 2018

I think ageism is the biggest factor on DU vis-a-vis Pelosi. The RW hate is more misogyny. Of course we have some who hate her for both biases.

I have faith that she will pull everyone together.

Eliot Rosewater

(32,537 posts)
80. Many categories, of course. 25 years of non stop lies and propaganda about her
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 05:24 PM
Nov 2018

has infected the thought process of a bunch of people on all sides.

Wait, that is Hillary.

Uh oh, guess what, applies to both of them doesnt it.

Response to sagesnow (Reply #64)

Response to Cha (Reply #67)

pecosbob

(7,904 posts)
71. Everything in the Media with Pelosi's name in it currently is a RW talking point
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 05:13 PM
Nov 2018

Learn to ignore this crap. For example, the phrase "The incoming speaker is getting protested by one of her freshman," was spoken by Paul Ryan, but repeated by tens of thousands of Dems in the last two days. Dems should stop repeating Republican talking points. Be a little critical of who's spewing this bullshit, people.

George II

(67,782 posts)
84. Are you serious? REALLY? How did that happen? I thought women were inferior to men....
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 05:36 PM
Nov 2018

....and incapable of accomplishing such things.

Say it ain't so!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A woman led Dems back to ...