Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Demovictory9

(32,445 posts)
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 01:38 AM Nov 2018

Whitaker was paid 1.2 million as only employee of mysterious nonprofit

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/conservative-nonprofit-with-obscure-roots-and-undisclosed-funders-paid-matthew-whitaker-12-million/2018/11/20/25ff987e-e9db-11e8-bd89-eecf3b178206_story.html?utm_term=.501d49c7d437

In the three years after he arrived in Washington in 2014, Matthew G. Whitaker received more than $1.2 million as the leader of a charity that reported having no other employees, some of the best pay of his career.

The Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust described itself as a new watchdog nonprofit dedicated to exposing unethical conduct by public officials. For Whitaker, it became a lucrative steppingstone in a swift rise from a modest law practice in Iowa to the nation’s top law enforcement job. As FACT’s president, he regularly appeared on radio and television, often to skewer liberals.

But FACT’s origins and the source of funding used to pay Whitaker — now the acting attorney general — remain obscured. An examination of state and federal records, and interviews with those involved, show that the group is part of a national network of nonprofits that often work in concert to amplify conservative messages.

Contrary to its claims in news releases and a tax filing, the group was created under a different name two years before Whitaker’s arrival, according to incorporation and IRS records. At least two of the organizers were involved in another conservative charity using the same address.

In its application to the IRS for status as a tax-exempt organization, the organizers reported that the group would study the impact of environmental regulations on businesses, records show. In that incarnation, the group took no action and “only existed on paper,” one man named in IRS filings as a board member told The Washington Post. Another named in a state filing as a board member said he never agreed to be on the board.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Whitaker was paid 1.2 million as only employee of mysterious nonprofit (Original Post) Demovictory9 Nov 2018 OP
Russian money? Botany Nov 2018 #1
Or ye olde Wingnut Welfare. JHB Nov 2018 #10
A charity? SweetieD Nov 2018 #2
Sounds like tax fraud; tax filings contained false information (board member never agreed to be one) RockRaven Nov 2018 #3
He's gonna be up "Schiff's Creek" soon I hope SHRED Nov 2018 #4
Whitaker is dirty as shit dalton99a Nov 2018 #5
Money laundering? AJT Nov 2018 #6
Yep Mr. Quackers Nov 2018 #7
Drain th swamp. Jail the GOP rats. oasis Nov 2018 #8
Maybe Whitaker was researching toilets for underendowed republicans? Achilleaze Nov 2018 #9
FACT president: A phony credential to introduce him to audiences Hortensis Nov 2018 #11

RockRaven

(14,952 posts)
3. Sounds like tax fraud; tax filings contained false information (board member never agreed to be one)
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 02:10 AM
Nov 2018

Lock him up!

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)
9. Maybe Whitaker was researching toilets for underendowed republicans?
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 05:55 AM
Nov 2018

I mean, that seems to be the kind of stupid shit republicans are fixated on.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
11. FACT president: A phony credential to introduce him to audiences
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 06:07 AM
Nov 2018

on talk shows, etcetera? That's speculation I heard -- from I think Rachel -- when he was first appointed.

Like all his better schticks, the ones that rise above huckstering and scamming, this man was apparently turned into a talk show figure by people who decided he was their kind of guy and could be useful. Wonder if they had an appointment to a judicial seat in mind next...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Whitaker was paid 1.2 mil...