I'd vote for Amy Carter over Clinton's kid anyday
Since DU is having some kind of fantasy football crap.
Amy Carter later became known for her political activism, participating in a number of sit-ins and protests during the 1980s and early 1990s, aimed at changing U.S. foreign policy towards South African apartheid and Central America.[6] Along with activist Abbie Hoffman and 13 others, she was arrested during a 1986 demonstration at the University of Massachusetts Amherst for protesting CIA recruitment there.
She was acquitted of all charges in a well-publicized trial in Northampton, Massachusetts. Attorney Leonard Weinglass, who defended Abbie Hoffman in the Chicago Seven trial in the 1960s, utilized the necessity defense, successfully arguing that CIA involvement in Central America and other hotspots were equivalent to trespassing in a burning building.[8] This occurred during Carter's sophomore year at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island. She was eventually dismissed from Brown for academic reasons and declined an opportunity to return.[9]
She is a member of the board of counselors of the Carter Center that advocates human rights and diplomacy as established by her father.[6]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Carter
= new reply since forum marked as read
I wonder if she has DU up next to Scottrade? 
Before it's too late.
Disgusting.
he's better, by far than aynryan the racist teabagger and mittflip. 
If Chelsea Clinton wants to run for office somewhere, she can and it will be up to the voters to determine her merits and qualifications for public office. Considering the number of RW hacks running for office, I don't see why she would be any less competent and/or qualified than any of them to do so. And for gosh sakes, if you don't like her because she hasn't "done anything" or you don't like the idea of political dynasties, just.don't.vote.for.her! No need IMHO to start a pointless flame war over two women whose parents happened to be Presidents of the United States at one time.
is billy boy was responsible, in a large way, for the state of our MSM today, communications act, also nafta, and the taking away of safety nets for the most needy. Little chelsea is a spoiled little princess who I suspect is a 1percenter or wannabe.
Last edited Fri Aug 17, 2012, 10:42 AM - Edit history (1)
you are entitled to draw comparisons between these two offspring of past presidents. don't let all the faux offended here put you off your right to comment, in a healthy way, on any subject you please. There is still your right to free speech, although some will attack you for it.
I like amy carter's responsible efforts also. also I am through with responding to any and all BLUE DOG DEMOCRATS on democratic party people warts and rethug/teabagger apologizing. I now know who you are.
for your vote. And yes let's get off the democratic party people warts and get back to the REAL problem aynryan and mittflip.. Oh and as an aside, just because you call it stupid speculation, your uninformed ego, doesn't make it so
you are so right, and then when the whiners/detractors/distractors get offended by a person going right back at em, they whine to admin and get a person banned from responding got to be real careful with all the bluedogs on here, they hate Obama as bad as any rethug or teabagger.
Are we going to be debating Malia and Sasha next? How does Caroline Kennedy fit in?
Bottom line: Chelsea, Amy, Caroline, Malia, Sasha.....all are good people. They all grew up in the public spotlight and--at least in Caroline, Amy and Chelsea's case--have developed into wonderful, bright people. (And I have no doubt Malia and Sasha will follow suit.)
Unlike, you know, these ladies:
But this whole conversation is ridiculous.
