General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe difference between the legal perjury trap and a practical perjury trap
"The Legal Perjury Trap
As a legal defense, the perjury trap is a practically non-existent theory. How non-existent? So non-existent that there are no federal cases granting a motion to dismiss because of a perjury trap.
There are no federal cases granting a motion to dismiss because of a perjury trap.
Though many have tried the perjury trap defense, none have ever succeeded on the Federal level. "
"The Practical Perjury Trap.
There is a very real perjury trap that defendants commonly face, and that is the kind of trap Flynn actually found himself in. In such cases the defendant is guilty (or at least thinks he is). When questioned the defendant faces a dilemma, a trap if you will.
To answer truthfully is to confess to a crime. To lie is to commit the new crime of perjury.
The practical perjury trap is the dilemma of the guilty man who knows that to tell the truth is to confess, but to lie is to commit perjury."
https://medium.com/KeithDB/the-perjury-trap-what-it-is-and-what-it-is-not-27ca98f0bec4
Legal perjury traps are unethical (Mueller would never use such a tactic) and cases have been dismissed and convictions overturned at the state and local level because of it.
Associates of Trump, and maybe family members and even Trump himself, have been caught up in the practical perjury trap. To answer questions honestly is to admit a crime or open doors for further investigation but to lie is to commit another crime.
So when Trump loyalists are screaming about "illegal" perjury traps, they are trying to confuse the issue by getting us to think that the practical perjury traps that have taken down many Trump associates are legal perjury traps which are unethical and the use of can throw out a case.
ret5hd
(20,480 posts)I'm not seeing how someone committing perjury in any circumstance would be considered permissible for any reason.
Kaleva
(36,244 posts)"Perjury-Trap Doctrine Law and Legal Definition
Perjury trap doctrine refers to a principle that a perjury indictment against a person must be dismissed if the prosecution secures it by calling that person as a grand-jury witness in an effort to obtain evidence for a perjury charge especially when the persons testimony does not relate to issues material to the ongoing grand-jury investigation. The perjury trap is a form of entrapment defense, and so must be affirmatively proven by the defendant."
https://definitions.uslegal.com/p/perjury-trap-doctrine/
ret5hd
(20,480 posts)you are asking that person to testify is to get evidence of perjury.
Does that sum it up?
Kaleva
(36,244 posts)before a grand jury.
"A perjury trap is created when the government calls a witness before the grand jury for the primary purpose of obtaining testimony from him in order to prosecute him later for perjury."
https://definitions.uslegal.com/p/perjury-trap-doctrine/
"A perjury trap describes the phenomenon of a less-than-scrupulous prosecutor eliciting testimony for the sole purpose of securing a perjury conviction. In the classic example, United States v. Chen,[1] an official was asked questions about violations that were barred by the statute of limitations and then tagged with perjury. "
https://definitions.uslegal.com/p/perjury-trap-doctrine/
Takket
(21,528 posts)The 5th amendment was built right into the constitution to protect us from such things. If you chose to lie anyway because you think it will "look bad" if you plead the 5th, you get what you deserve.
Kaleva
(36,244 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,812 posts)but I find the entire concept of "perjury trap" to be nonsensical.
You're not supposed to lie under oath. If you do, that's perjury and if you get caught there are consequences. And has already been pointed out, taking the 5th is always an alternative, isn't it?
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,241 posts)jcgoldie
(11,610 posts)...from a commentator on meet the press and I dont remember her name... "If I carry my wallet in my pocket is that a robbery trap?"
tblue37
(65,216 posts)To get a direct link to the article rather than to the Medium home page, remove the "@" from the URL.