Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew Hatch Act guidelines prohibit talk of impeachment, use of terms "resist" and "resistance"
Found this thanks to a tweet from Walter Shaub linking to a tweet from American Oversight, which is protesting the new guidelines:
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
American Oversight's statement on this, on their website:
https://www.americanoversight.org/new-guidance-for-federal-employees-political-activity-goes-too-far
The OSC guidance states that activity related to the Resistance or the use of that term is considered political activity under the Hatch Act, as is advocating for impeachment of an official who is also a candidate for future office (such as President Trump, who announced his 2020 candidacy in 2017).
American Oversight sent a letter to OSC expressing concern about the guidance and its serious policy and constitutional implications, noting that there is a difference between advocating for or against an officials election (prohibited by the Hatch Act) and advocating that an official did or did not commit treason or high crimes (impeachable under the Constitution). OSCs guidance suggests the opposite, arguing that since impeachment bars offenders from future public service it is the same as arguing that an official should not be re-elected.
OSCs categorical prohibition on the use of resist or resistance terms as political activity is also too broad. The First Amendment protects employees right to object to administration actions and policies, and conflating such terms with electoral advocacy opens the door to public employees being retaliated against for their opinions. With the Trump administration already corruptly trying to root out the deep state, the OSC should not empower Trump appointees to target people who resist administration policies like family separation.
American Oversight sent a letter to OSC expressing concern about the guidance and its serious policy and constitutional implications, noting that there is a difference between advocating for or against an officials election (prohibited by the Hatch Act) and advocating that an official did or did not commit treason or high crimes (impeachable under the Constitution). OSCs guidance suggests the opposite, arguing that since impeachment bars offenders from future public service it is the same as arguing that an official should not be re-elected.
OSCs categorical prohibition on the use of resist or resistance terms as political activity is also too broad. The First Amendment protects employees right to object to administration actions and policies, and conflating such terms with electoral advocacy opens the door to public employees being retaliated against for their opinions. With the Trump administration already corruptly trying to root out the deep state, the OSC should not empower Trump appointees to target people who resist administration policies like family separation.
That page also includes the complete text of the new guidelines, including the third section about Trump's already campaigning for re-election making use of the terms "resist" and "resistance" political activity..
And please note -- the OSC or Office of the Special Counsel issuing these new guidelines
https://osc.gov/
has nothing to do with Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1047 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Hatch Act guidelines prohibit talk of impeachment, use of terms "resist" and "resistance" (Original Post)
highplainsdem
Nov 2018
OP
I know it's the symbol for omega. I just don't get the relevance to my OP.
highplainsdem
Nov 2018
#5
Oh. Just did some googling. It's the symbol for ohm, measuring electrical resistance.
highplainsdem
Nov 2018
#6
These terms would have been considered illegal during President Obama's term.
former9thward
Nov 2018
#7
underpants
(182,753 posts)1. Jeebus
Freethinker65
(10,009 posts)2. Ω
highplainsdem
(48,966 posts)3. ????????????
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,391 posts)4. Hint: it shows up in crossword puzzles all the time, along with
Mel Ott, and Bobby Orr, and....
highplainsdem
(48,966 posts)5. I know it's the symbol for omega. I just don't get the relevance to my OP.
highplainsdem
(48,966 posts)6. Oh. Just did some googling. It's the symbol for ohm, measuring electrical resistance.
Okay...
former9thward
(31,973 posts)7. These terms would have been considered illegal during President Obama's term.
If you are opposed to the Hatch Act that is fine. But it will have to be repealed if you think government employees should engage in that type of political activity.