Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pbmus

(12,422 posts) Fri Dec 14, 2018, 06:50 PM Dec 2018

8

Not alright for Bill Clinton but it's aok for the Big Con...

Link to tweet

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Not alright for Bill Clinton but it's aok for the Big Con... (Original Post) pbmus Dec 2018 OP

And did ANYBODY MyOwnPeace Dec 2018 #1

Don't forget Lawrence O'Donnell's tweet in response Jarqui Dec 2018 #2

This is why we need to get The Orange under oath. aikoaiko Dec 2018 #3

MyOwnPeace

(16,924 posts)

1. And did ANYBODY

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Fri Dec 14, 2018, 07:08 PM

Dec 2018

ask him what was the difference?

THAT is where the MSM is letting us down - no follow-up to put them in a position to explain their hypocrisy!

Jarqui

(10,122 posts)

2. Don't forget Lawrence O'Donnell's tweet in response

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Fri Dec 14, 2018, 07:12 PM

Dec 2018

Link to tweet

and the balance of that Daily Beast article

aikoaiko

(34,165 posts)

3. This is why we need to get The Orange under oath.

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Fri Dec 14, 2018, 07:13 PM

Dec 2018

He is too far gone to keep his lies straight.

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Not alright for Bill Clin...