Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

manor321

(3,344 posts)
Sun Dec 23, 2018, 08:03 PM Dec 2018

Roberts orders temporary halt of contempt order in mystery case

BREAKING: Chief Justice John Roberts halts contempt order against company owned by foreign country and penalties in mystery grand jury subpoena matter, pending response due by Dec. 31 and further order of Roberts or the Supreme Court.



13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Roberts orders temporary halt of contempt order in mystery case (Original Post) manor321 Dec 2018 OP
crap mucifer Dec 2018 #1
Not good bluestarone Dec 2018 #2
TEMPORARY halt. orangecrush Dec 2018 #6
TY bluestarone Dec 2018 #7
... orangecrush Dec 2018 #9
Clicking on the tweet it's from 2 days ago so it's not breaking and it isn't clear mucifer Dec 2018 #3
The date time of the relevant tweet is 6:34 PM - 23 Dec 2018 manor321 Dec 2018 #5
Don't get excited. madaboutharry Dec 2018 #4
'pending receipt of a reponse, due ... Dec 31...' elleng Dec 2018 #8
I agree. I'm only slightly nervous. Just a little. :) manor321 Dec 2018 #11
I think this would set a precedent if this went forward and was not kicked back. Closed secession juxtaposed Dec 2018 #10
I am beginning to think that the secret country may be a very close ally. allgood33 Dec 2018 #12
K&R UTUSN Dec 2018 #13

mucifer

(23,533 posts)
3. Clicking on the tweet it's from 2 days ago so it's not breaking and it isn't clear
Sun Dec 23, 2018, 08:11 PM
Dec 2018

if it's negative or positive. But, it would have been nice if Roberts just chose to keep quiet.

madaboutharry

(40,209 posts)
4. Don't get excited.
Sun Dec 23, 2018, 08:12 PM
Dec 2018

It is not on the subpoena itself and he is kicking the can down the road a bit to gather facts and info.

elleng

(130,865 posts)
8. 'pending receipt of a reponse, due ... Dec 31...'
Sun Dec 23, 2018, 08:18 PM
Dec 2018

This is procedural, enabling the parties thoroughly to inform the Court, which some might think is a good thing.

 

juxtaposed

(2,778 posts)
10. I think this would set a precedent if this went forward and was not kicked back. Closed secession
Sun Dec 23, 2018, 08:25 PM
Dec 2018

in the S/C would be interesting.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Roberts orders temporary ...