Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRoberts orders temporary halt of contempt order in mystery case
BREAKING: Chief Justice John Roberts halts contempt order against company owned by foreign country and penalties in mystery grand jury subpoena matter, pending response due by Dec. 31 and further order of Roberts or the Supreme Court.
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
13 replies, 2870 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
13 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Roberts orders temporary halt of contempt order in mystery case (Original Post)
manor321
Dec 2018
OP
Clicking on the tweet it's from 2 days ago so it's not breaking and it isn't clear
mucifer
Dec 2018
#3
mucifer
(23,533 posts)1. crap
bluestarone
(16,911 posts)2. Not good
Bad feeling here!
orangecrush
(19,541 posts)6. TEMPORARY halt.
bluestarone
(16,911 posts)7. TY
Still sends a chill down my back
orangecrush
(19,541 posts)9. ...
mucifer
(23,533 posts)3. Clicking on the tweet it's from 2 days ago so it's not breaking and it isn't clear
if it's negative or positive. But, it would have been nice if Roberts just chose to keep quiet.
manor321
(3,344 posts)5. The date time of the relevant tweet is 6:34 PM - 23 Dec 2018
madaboutharry
(40,209 posts)4. Don't get excited.
It is not on the subpoena itself and he is kicking the can down the road a bit to gather facts and info.
elleng
(130,865 posts)8. 'pending receipt of a reponse, due ... Dec 31...'
This is procedural, enabling the parties thoroughly to inform the Court, which some might think is a good thing.
manor321
(3,344 posts)11. I agree. I'm only slightly nervous. Just a little. :)
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)10. I think this would set a precedent if this went forward and was not kicked back. Closed secession
in the S/C would be interesting.
allgood33
(1,584 posts)12. I am beginning to think that the secret country may be a very close ally.