Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yavin4

(35,437 posts)
Sun Dec 30, 2018, 10:55 PM Dec 2018

Mike Bloomberg prepared to spend at least $100 million on a 2020 campaign for president if he...

decides to run

Billionaire Mike Bloomberg is prepared to spend well over the $100 million he put into his last campaign for New York City mayor if he runs for president in 2020. And he does not plan to accept any outside money from political action committees if he jumps into the race, CNBC has learned.

Howard Wolfson, Bloomberg's top political advisor, in an email hinted at how much his boss would look to invest into his own potential campaign for president.


Which means that he will get extremely favorable coverage from the media. Why? Where will he spend the bulk of that $100 million? On TV ads of course. Buying big blocks of ads == favorable coverage.
60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mike Bloomberg prepared to spend at least $100 million on a 2020 campaign for president if he... (Original Post) Yavin4 Dec 2018 OP
Gee another Businessman runing Tribalceltic Dec 2018 #1
He has political experience, he ran NYC for like 12 years. nt Blue_true Dec 2018 #14
Not quite an appropriate observation for two reasons PJMcK Dec 2018 #38
No billionaires please manor321 Dec 2018 #2
How about we allow anyone in, regardless of income, but don't vote for people who supported StevieM Dec 2018 #6
But, but... at least he's a registered Democrat, right? InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2018 #19
He has been D, R, and I at various times. nt tblue37 Dec 2018 #23
Ugh! Hated him as NY mayor, sure my opinion won't change. nt jrthin Dec 2018 #3
Rockefeller Republican BeyondGeography Dec 2018 #4
What we considered Rockefeller Republicans back in the day... Dennis Donovan Dec 2018 #43
Won't get my vote! OrlandoDem2 Dec 2018 #5
He's not very likely to get my primary vote. ooky Dec 2018 #53
As what? 3rd party? Cha Dec 2018 #7
how is gonna connect to voters in midwest? AlexSFCA Dec 2018 #8
Oh, goody. Another 80-year-old fossil running for president. BlueStater Dec 2018 #9
He was on Meet The Press today. moondust Dec 2018 #10
As exciting as drying concrete. VOX Dec 2018 #11
Fuck that 'Stop and Frisk' proponent. n/t X_Digger Dec 2018 #12
He definitely would not be a favorite of gun toters. Hoyt Dec 2018 #29
Or the ACLU. Or non-racists. Or people who value the 4th amendment. n/t X_Digger Dec 2018 #45
Somehow, I don't see racist gun-fanciers supporting Bloomberg. He's spent too much on sensible Hoyt Dec 2018 #56
Authoritarian assholes with no respect for privacy might. X_Digger Dec 2018 #60
If he is the Democratic nominee he gets my vote. AJT Dec 2018 #13
Same here. Blue_true Dec 2018 #16
Same for me, no question... he won't be, but sure, just for fun, let's pretend. InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2018 #20
There is no amount of money that would make him a viable candidate on our side. Bleacher Creature Dec 2018 #15
He is worth something north of $15 billion. Blue_true Dec 2018 #18
Over 46 billion USD, minus the 1.8 billion he just gave to Johns Hopkins Celerity Dec 2018 #40
Wow, was I way off. Blue_true Dec 2018 #44
Fight fire with fire sarisataka Dec 2018 #17
He's not a Republican brooklynite Dec 2018 #26
He has never sarisataka Dec 2018 #37
He is definitely egotistical. smirkymonkey Dec 2018 #49
You know Party ID is largely a flag of convenience in NY... brooklynite Dec 2018 #50
Bloomberg is a legitimate billionaire NewJeffCT Dec 2018 #51
Just get big money out of politics period. defacto7 Dec 2018 #21
if he runs as a third party candidate edhopper Dec 2018 #22
Nobody has suggested that he'd run as an Independent brooklynite Dec 2018 #25
I think the opposite , he takes votes from trump. pwb Dec 2018 #33
It's a tough call, but, he won't bring in the Obama vote. And that's pretty much how 45 "won." lindysalsagal Dec 2018 #59
Michael Bloomberg on 2020: "I Would Certainly Run As A Democrat" oberliner Dec 2018 #35
Good to hear edhopper Dec 2018 #48
Can you provide some evidence that local ad buys result in favorable national coverage? brooklynite Dec 2018 #24
Joe Biden will appreciate the donation flibbitygiblets Dec 2018 #27
I won't vote for a Billionaire, ugh! sarcasmo Dec 2018 #28
Save your money bruh. Basement Beat Dec 2018 #30
Better spent in support of the actual nominee PoorMonger Dec 2018 #31
Good, if he runs as an independent against trump. About time pukes had a spoiler. pwb Dec 2018 #32
Michael Bloomberg on 2020: "I Would Certainly Run As A Democrat" oberliner Dec 2018 #34
Well that would suck then. pwb Dec 2018 #36
He would probably suck more votes from Democrats Renew Deal Dec 2018 #47
He is Republican . And he is better than trump so i'm not sure I agree. pwb Dec 2018 #54
He was a RINO. Renew Deal Dec 2018 #57
I still hope he runs as a Independant. pwb Dec 2018 #58
Billionaires have their own agendas, I will never cast a primary vote for Bloomberg Devil Child Dec 2018 #39
Mr. Stop and Search Gentrify NYC So No One Can Afford To Live There Anymore tenderfoot Dec 2018 #41
Exactly... ariesgem Dec 2018 #52
Big Business Billionaire? kentuck Dec 2018 #42
He should save the money and spend it in the GE Renew Deal Dec 2018 #46
Warren would eat his lunch in the primaries Qutzupalotl Dec 2018 #55

PJMcK

(22,031 posts)
38. Not quite an appropriate observation for two reasons
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 02:30 AM
Dec 2018

One, Michael Bloomberg is REALLY a successful businessman. He built profitable companies that continue today. He's also truly rich, unlike Trump.

Two, Mr. Bloomberg has 12 years of experience in government having been a decent mayor of New York City.

Another thought is that Trump said he would self-finance his campaign which just turned out to be another lie. Mr. Bloomberg wouldn't feel it financially if he spent his own money on his campaign.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
6. How about we allow anyone in, regardless of income, but don't vote for people who supported
Sun Dec 30, 2018, 11:12 PM
Dec 2018

Bush/Cheney for re-election.

BeyondGeography

(39,369 posts)
4. Rockefeller Republican
Sun Dec 30, 2018, 11:02 PM
Dec 2018

Hard to see him getting to 1st base in our primary. I will say that his takedown of Trump at the DNC in 2016 was unsurpassed.

ooky

(8,922 posts)
53. He's not very likely to get my primary vote.
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 11:49 AM
Dec 2018

But if he ends up the Democrats general election candidate he will get my vote.

It just has to be that way.

BlueStater

(7,596 posts)
9. Oh, goody. Another 80-year-old fossil running for president.
Sun Dec 30, 2018, 11:24 PM
Dec 2018

Nothing like having the future shaped by people who won't be alive to experience it.

moondust

(19,972 posts)
10. He was on Meet The Press today.
Sun Dec 30, 2018, 11:31 PM
Dec 2018

NBC had him labeled as a (D).

The discussion was mostly about climate change. He seems to understand the seriousness of it. Obviously not an idiot.

He said he would probably decide about running in January or February. When asked what he thought his chances would be among Democrats, he said he had won his mayoral race three(?) times in Democratic, minority-majority NYC.

That's all I remember.

VOX

(22,976 posts)
11. As exciting as drying concrete.
Sun Dec 30, 2018, 11:31 PM
Dec 2018

Now, if that concrete was being fitted for a pair of “shoes” for 45, you might have something.

Just what America needs, another Mr. Moneybags who absolutely KNOWS the ins and outs of diplomacy, negotiation and governmental protocols. NEXT!

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
56. Somehow, I don't see racist gun-fanciers supporting Bloomberg. He's spent too much on sensible
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 01:08 PM
Dec 2018

gun control countrywide.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
60. Authoritarian assholes with no respect for privacy might.
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 03:16 PM
Dec 2018

Last edited Mon Dec 31, 2018, 04:17 PM - Edit history (1)

You know, the kind who think that people have no right to be secure in their persons.

But of course, that's not you, right?



http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=45338

As a former robber, I locked the door to keep people out, especially police.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
16. Same here.
Sun Dec 30, 2018, 11:43 PM
Dec 2018

But I don't expect him to be the nominee. I think that he would be a good Secretary of State in a democratic administration, he has the gravitas to repair some of the worldwide damage that Trump has done.

Bleacher Creature

(11,256 posts)
15. There is no amount of money that would make him a viable candidate on our side.
Sun Dec 30, 2018, 11:40 PM
Dec 2018

If he wants to stop Trump, he should put aside his ego, save his money, and get on board.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
18. He is worth something north of $15 billion.
Sun Dec 30, 2018, 11:46 PM
Dec 2018

He has plenty of money to spend. I would much rather see him aggressively support the democratic nominee and then become SOS, I think he could fix lots of worldwide damage in that role. President is a little above his capability, IMO.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
44. Wow, was I way off.
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 10:50 AM
Dec 2018

That's a lot of Benjamins. But if he tried to cash out completely, he would end up with less unless he sold his media empire to a big media company like NBC Universal. Family owned businesses are weird animals, typically their value is strongly tied to the patriarch or matriarch.

sarisataka

(18,600 posts)
17. Fight fire with fire
Sun Dec 30, 2018, 11:46 PM
Dec 2018

If they going to stick with an egotistical New York Republican billionaire, we need to run an egotistical New York Republican billionaire too








sarisataka

(18,600 posts)
37. He has never
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 01:58 AM
Dec 2018

held office as a Democrat. He changes parties like most people will change hats so I will not consider him a Democrat, no matter what letter he chooses to put after his name this week.

If the man who stated when he gets to heaven he does need to wait in line but passes right on in is not egotistical then no one is...

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
49. He is definitely egotistical.
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 11:32 AM
Dec 2018

Are you kidding me? I lived in NYC during much of Bloomberg's term. He is very paternalistic and believes what he thinks is best for everyone should be the law. He has a huge ego, he's just not as obnoxious and as vulgar as Donald Trump.

Also, his political affiliation seems to blow with the wind. He's an opportunist. He would be much better than Trump, but he's not what we need for this country to heal. He will never understand the problem of income inequality in this country and that is one of our greatest challenges.

brooklynite

(94,501 posts)
50. You know Party ID is largely a flag of convenience in NY...
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 11:35 AM
Dec 2018

Giuliani used to run as a "Liberal".

If you want to question Bloomberg's policies as a measure of fitness to run for President, you're welcome to. Since he left the Mayoralty, he's been a strong supporter of Democratic candidates.

lindysalsagal

(20,666 posts)
59. It's a tough call, but, he won't bring in the Obama vote. And that's pretty much how 45 "won."
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 02:08 PM
Dec 2018

So, I have mixed feelings, for sure. I think we need someone with some heart and soul. Bloomberg is efficient, but won't win hearts, minds, or women.

PoorMonger

(844 posts)
31. Better spent in support of the actual nominee
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 01:42 AM
Dec 2018

Whoever it ends up being. And I really doubt it’s Bloomberg himself. He doesn’t seem to inspire anyone to the level we are gonna need in 2020.

pwb

(11,261 posts)
32. Good, if he runs as an independent against trump. About time pukes had a spoiler.
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 01:47 AM
Dec 2018

Like the green party sucks votes from us every election.

Renew Deal

(81,855 posts)
47. He would probably suck more votes from Democrats
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 10:57 AM
Dec 2018

He’s pro-environment, pro-choice, and anti-gun.

pwb

(11,261 posts)
54. He is Republican . And he is better than trump so i'm not sure I agree.
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 12:06 PM
Dec 2018

With the blue wave I think he would help us. But i Have been wrong.

Renew Deal

(81,855 posts)
57. He was a RINO.
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 01:19 PM
Dec 2018

He’s been funding Democrats for years. He’s very publicly for gun control and the environment. Rigid republicans would avoid him. He could hurt us with those that want Center-left. Don’t get stuck on labels.

pwb

(11,261 posts)
58. I still hope he runs as a Independant.
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 01:33 PM
Dec 2018

He will never win the democratic primary so he will not be a candidate unless he runs as an independent. Either way it will hurt trump when he campaigns against everything trump stands for. Good talk.

 

Devil Child

(2,728 posts)
39. Billionaires have their own agendas, I will never cast a primary vote for Bloomberg
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 03:23 AM
Dec 2018

Hoping his money is wasted with little “return” for his “investment.” Our political system is not your playground Bloomberg.

Renew Deal

(81,855 posts)
46. He should save the money and spend it in the GE
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 10:55 AM
Dec 2018

Bloomberg is something like 78. He’s basically a nicer version of Trump. He’s a real billionaire with some experience, though that is as a mayor. I’m just not sure that there is a big enough base for him in the Democratic Party.

Qutzupalotl

(14,302 posts)
55. Warren would eat his lunch in the primaries
Mon Dec 31, 2018, 12:17 PM
Dec 2018

whether or not she becomes the nominee, especially if there is anything self-serving in his candidacy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mike Bloomberg prepared t...