Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,781 posts)
Tue Jan 8, 2019, 08:49 AM Jan 2019

WaPo: How would you narrow the 2020 Democratic field?

Democratic voters have no shortage of choices as the 2020 presidential primaries draw nearer. More than three dozen politicians, former officials and political outsiders have considered throwing their hats into the ring, with at least 20 likely to commit by the first primary debate in 2019.

They all bring different visions of what the party needs. Is it generational change, a history-making barrier breaker, a centrist with a proven ability to win Trump voters or a military veteran?

But the decision is not up to them. For the voters who will decide, here is a quick guide to help with understanding the choices ahead.


Article includes fun interactive chart
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WaPo: How would you narrow the 2020 Democratic field? (Original Post) Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2019 OP
Almost two years out, I won't. spanone Jan 2019 #1
I get that. I thought the interactive chart was fun. Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2019 #10
Not that he would necessarily get my vote but sellitman Jan 2019 #2
That is surprising Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2019 #7
Why should he be on that list? Other than his surname. TSheehan Jan 2019 #11
He's young, the rep for Mass 4, and voters seem to like him Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2019 #15
We have one declared candidate and more pressing matters to worry about. Squinch Jan 2019 #3
I know this is wishful thinking, but I would like to see panader0 Jan 2019 #4
We will really appreciate your reasoning when 20 people are getting up on a stage to debate Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2019 #12
By voting in the primary. Iggo Jan 2019 #5
They have a fun, interactive chart Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2019 #8
Yeah, I'm just not interested in their trying to split us up into rival camps. Iggo Jan 2019 #19
I agree on that Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2019 #20
Narrow???! How about examining our choices first? As they present? Hortensis Jan 2019 #6
Only one offers a real choice, has inspired so many, and has been on the right side for decades. TSheehan Jan 2019 #9
Martin O'Malley??? Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2019 #13
Who? TSheehan Jan 2019 #16
"Democratic choice." Keep up. Squinch Jan 2019 #21
I would use a type of election called "Primaries." lagomorph777 Jan 2019 #14
Why not celebrate the fact that we have so many excellent Dems willing to take on an incumbent? Hekate Jan 2019 #17
ixnay the ernie sandersbay Maru Kitteh Jan 2019 #18

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,781 posts)
10. I get that. I thought the interactive chart was fun.
Wed Jan 9, 2019, 03:14 PM
Jan 2019

I think most of our focus needs to return to resistance at least through summer.

That said, John Delaney just made a stop in Omaha and is opening six field offices in Iowa. Elizabeth Warren was just in Council Bluffs and looks to be opening offices soon. It's starting now, whether we like it or not. And the reality is that the shutdown/border wall argument is really just the first round of Trump's 2020 campaign.

panader0

(25,816 posts)
4. I know this is wishful thinking, but I would like to see
Tue Jan 8, 2019, 09:40 AM
Jan 2019

all potential candidates have a convention and decide who has the best
road to be elected. It would sure save a lot of energy and money.
The Democrats have a surplus of very good choices.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,781 posts)
12. We will really appreciate your reasoning when 20 people are getting up on a stage to debate
Wed Jan 9, 2019, 03:16 PM
Jan 2019

I'd like to narrow it to 5 prior to the primaries. As you say - wishful thinking.

Iggo

(47,534 posts)
19. Yeah, I'm just not interested in their trying to split us up into rival camps.
Wed Jan 9, 2019, 03:36 PM
Jan 2019

All Dems are good Dems.

I'm for all of them.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,781 posts)
20. I agree on that
Wed Jan 9, 2019, 05:33 PM
Jan 2019

But we have primaries to pick a nominee. We will all have different preferences. This time around, my hope is that we all approach it from the point of view of "I may like my candidate more than yours, but either is a huge improvement over Trump."

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
6. Narrow???! How about examining our choices first? As they present?
Tue Jan 8, 2019, 10:00 AM
Jan 2019

For instance, how many of us have taken a good look at WA governor Jay Inslee or CO senator Michael Bennett yet? Gov. Jay Inslee is running; and watchers say Bennett, whom Obama described as one of our rising, gifted Democrats, is apparently showing signs.

I was surprised at just how much I was heartened when Elizabeth Warren announced, but we have a bunch of people to listen to and carefully inspect before even thinking of narrowing the field (or allowing the press, Repubs and Russians to do it for us!).

And then, as Iggo says.

The Atlantic: Jay Inslee Is Betting He Can Win the Presidency on Climate Change

“When you’ve been working on something for over a decade, and now seeing people awakening to that, it’s just really gratifying and heartening,” the Washington governor recently told me...

Other Democrats ... Inslee is the only one who has actually run a government that has made climate-change policy central."
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/01/washington-governor-jay-inslee-running-president/579217/
 

TSheehan

(277 posts)
9. Only one offers a real choice, has inspired so many, and has been on the right side for decades.
Wed Jan 9, 2019, 03:12 PM
Jan 2019

He ran last time around, and did impressively well as an underdog in the primaries.

Hekate

(90,538 posts)
17. Why not celebrate the fact that we have so many excellent Dems willing to take on an incumbent?
Wed Jan 9, 2019, 03:26 PM
Jan 2019

Trump is a monster, and he may well still be in office next year. If he runs again, the RNC will throw its weight behind him.

I really appreciate our Dems. There will be a natural thinning process over the next year -- I am not in any hurry to hasten anyone's departure, unless they are divisive and/or not a Democrat (but I repeat myself).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WaPo: How would you narro...