Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bluestarone

(16,906 posts)
Tue Jan 15, 2019, 03:43 PM Jan 2019

NOT that i'm for this BUT just curious If the House DID impeach RUMP, THEN

Could Turtle face stop it from reaching the floor for investigation? He's been stopping anything he wants too, so could he stop the process on his own? (I'm NOT saying we should impeach here because Muellers work needs to proceed FIRST)

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NOT that i'm for this BUT just curious If the House DID impeach RUMP, THEN (Original Post) bluestarone Jan 2019 OP
Yes. Wellstone ruled Jan 2019 #1
TY!!! bluestarone Jan 2019 #2
I would have to say no. LiberalFighter Jan 2019 #3
Nope. maxsolomon Jan 2019 #4
So if i hear you then IF the House impeach's then bluestarone Jan 2019 #6
Nope. maxsolomon Jan 2019 #8
Honestly i don't remember the process bluestarone Jan 2019 #11
I wish I could forget. maxsolomon Jan 2019 #13
The Constitution does not say the Senate has to proceed to trial marylandblue Jan 2019 #5
There are Senate Rules regarding this. LiberalFighter Jan 2019 #9
Senate Rules for Impeachment Trial LiberalFighter Jan 2019 #7
I do understand that part BUT bluestarone Jan 2019 #10
Only if they rule that the subject is not a person that can be impeached. LiberalFighter Jan 2019 #14
Sorry for having trouble here but trying to figure out the process. bluestarone Jan 2019 #16
I would suggest you read the Senate Rules. LiberalFighter Jan 2019 #17
McConnell can change the rules while Collins expresses concern. marylandblue Jan 2019 #15
Rules LiberalFighter Jan 2019 #12
He could keep it from reaching the Senate MiniMe Jan 2019 #18
THAT was my question ty bluestarone Jan 2019 #19

LiberalFighter

(50,888 posts)
3. I would have to say no.
Tue Jan 15, 2019, 03:51 PM
Jan 2019

It would appear that the House would prosecute during the trial while the Senate would be the jurors.

bluestarone

(16,906 posts)
6. So if i hear you then IF the House impeach's then
Tue Jan 15, 2019, 03:55 PM
Jan 2019

It goes to trial with Roberts in charge! Turtleface has NOTHING to do with it at this point? Does Turtle face call witness's then?

maxsolomon

(33,310 posts)
8. Nope.
Tue Jan 15, 2019, 03:59 PM
Jan 2019

He's a juror. He'll interfere with the decisions of the other Jurors, of course.

We went through this recently, just 20 years ago! Don't you remember?

bluestarone

(16,906 posts)
11. Honestly i don't remember the process
Tue Jan 15, 2019, 04:01 PM
Jan 2019

I'm just trying to get into my head if McConnell can STOP the process AFTER the House decides impeachment

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
5. The Constitution does not say the Senate has to proceed to trial
Tue Jan 15, 2019, 03:54 PM
Jan 2019

So McConnell will take full advantage of that.

LiberalFighter

(50,888 posts)
7. Senate Rules for Impeachment Trial
Tue Jan 15, 2019, 03:57 PM
Jan 2019
Senate Impeachment Rules

House decides if there will be a trial. Senate decides innocence or guilt and provides punishment.

LiberalFighter

(50,888 posts)
14. Only if they rule that the subject is not a person that can be impeached.
Tue Jan 15, 2019, 04:04 PM
Jan 2019

Meaning that under the Constitution only certain people outlined there fall under jurisdiction.

I believe in the past they ruled that member of Congress not subject to impeachment.

bluestarone

(16,906 posts)
16. Sorry for having trouble here but trying to figure out the process.
Tue Jan 15, 2019, 04:11 PM
Jan 2019

The question i have is per your comment, Only if they rule that the subject is not a person that can be impeached. Who is THEY in your comment? Is they the whole senate? My big question is Does the senate option NOT to hold a trail?

LiberalFighter

(50,888 posts)
12. Rules
Tue Jan 15, 2019, 04:02 PM
Jan 2019

Whensoever the Senate shall receive notice from the
House of Representatives that managers are appointed on
their part to conduct an impeachment against any person
and are directed to carry articles of impeachment to the
Senate, the Secretary of the Senate shall immediately in-
form the House of Representatives that the Senate is ready
to receive the managers for the purpose of exhibiting such
articles of impeachment, agreeably to such notice.


Upon such articles being presented to the Senate,
the Senate shall, at 1 o’clock afternoon of the day (Sunday
excepted) following such presentation, or sooner if ordered
by the Senate, proceed to the consideration of such articles
and shall continue in session from day to day (Sundays
excepted) after the trial shall commence (unless otherwise
ordered by the Senate) until final judgment shall be ren-
dered, and so much longer as may, in its judgment, be
needful. Before proceeding to the consideration of the arti-
cles of impeachment, the Presiding Officer shall administer
the oath hereinafter provided to the members of the Senate
then present and to the other members of the Senate as
they shall appear, whose duty it shall be to take the same


The Senate shall have power to compel the attend-
ance of witnesses, to enforce obedience to its orders, man-
dates, writs, precepts, and judgments, to preserve order,
and to punish in a summary way contempts of, and disobe-
dience to, its authority, orders, mandates, writs, precepts,
or judgments, and to make all lawful orders, rules, and
regulations which it may deem essential or conducive to
the ends of justice. And the Sergeant at Arms, under the
direction of the Senate, may employ such aid and assist-
ance as may be necessary to enforce, execute, and carry
into effect the lawful orders, mandates, writs, and precepts
of the Senate.

bluestarone

(16,906 posts)
19. THAT was my question ty
Tue Jan 15, 2019, 04:40 PM
Jan 2019

He could keep it from reaching the senate. So again McConnell could be involved i guess

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NOT that i'm for this BUT...