General Discussion

USALiberal

(10,877 posts) Wed Jan 16, 2019, 10:02 PM Jan 2019

FYI, Rachel will have Gillibrand on her show live tonight. I'm not interested. nt

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FYI, Rachel will have Gillibrand on her show live tonight. I'm not interested. nt (Original Post) USALiberal Jan 2019 OP

I am very glad Maddow will be interviewing her. riversedge Jan 2019 #1

Do you think she'll mention the Franken issue? n/t PoliticAverse Jan 2019 #2

Good question. I'll never vote for her unless she gets the nomination which will never happen. nt USALiberal Jan 2019 #3

The question will dog her. I may watch just to see how she responds. But so far, chimpymustgo Jan 2019 #5

I concur blm Jan 2019 #9

I will be interested to hear what she has to say 4now Jan 2019 #4

Agreed. NurseJackie Jan 2019 #6

I'll be catching up on my correspondence and doing some light cleaning. revmclaren Jan 2019 #7

I'm watching, I don't know if Rachel is doing Gillibrand any good ... I didn't know Gillibrand was uponit7771 Jan 2019 #8

I wonder why Rachel is giving her this time customerserviceguy Jan 2019 #10

I want to hear what they all have to say Raine Jan 2019 #11

I'll watch, even though I have yet to be impressed by Gillibrand Merlot Jan 2019 #12

riversedge

(70,182 posts)

1. I am very glad Maddow will be interviewing her.

Reply to USALiberal (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2019, 10:04 PM

Jan 2019

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)

2. Do you think she'll mention the Franken issue? n/t

Reply to USALiberal (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2019, 10:05 PM

Jan 2019

USALiberal

(10,877 posts)

3. Good question. I'll never vote for her unless she gets the nomination which will never happen. nt

Reply to PoliticAverse (Reply #2)

Wed Jan 16, 2019, 10:07 PM

Jan 2019

chimpymustgo

(12,774 posts)

5. The question will dog her. I may watch just to see how she responds. But so far,

Reply to USALiberal (Reply #3)

Wed Jan 16, 2019, 10:09 PM

Jan 2019

she just comes across as opportunistic and egotistical.

blm

(113,039 posts)

9. I concur

Reply to chimpymustgo (Reply #5)

Wed Jan 16, 2019, 10:32 PM

Jan 2019

4now

(1,596 posts)

4. I will be interested to hear what she has to say

Reply to USALiberal (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2019, 10:09 PM

Jan 2019

I want to hear from all Democrats that want to run.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)

6. Agreed.

Reply to USALiberal (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2019, 10:13 PM

Jan 2019

revmclaren

(2,505 posts)

7. I'll be catching up on my correspondence and doing some light cleaning.

Reply to USALiberal (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2019, 10:19 PM

Jan 2019

Not interested in anything this candidate has to say.

ONLY! 2019 and beyond.

uponit7771

(90,329 posts)

8. I'm watching, I don't know if Rachel is doing Gillibrand any good ... I didn't know Gillibrand was

Reply to USALiberal (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2019, 10:30 PM

Jan 2019

... such a conservative.

WOW !!!

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)

10. I wonder why Rachel is giving her this time

Reply to USALiberal (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2019, 10:32 PM

Jan 2019

Either she's trying to rehabilitate Gillibrand, or she's planning an attack on her for screwing over Franken.

Raine

(30,540 posts)

11. I want to hear what they all have to say

Reply to USALiberal (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2019, 10:34 PM

Jan 2019

I'm not set on anybody in particular.

Merlot

(9,696 posts)

12. I'll watch, even though I have yet to be impressed by Gillibrand

Reply to USALiberal (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2019, 11:50 PM

Jan 2019

Still waiting to see if there is any there, there. I

So far am loving Elizabeth Warren and Kamila Harris, doubtful Gillibrand can stack up to those two.

Reply to this discussion