'not accurate' is not 'totally inaccurate'...

[myohmy2]

Fox News, 1-19-2019

" “BuzzFeed’s description of specific statements to the Special Counsel’s Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s Congressional testimony are not accurate,” Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller’s office, said. "

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mueller-team-disputes-buzzfeed-report-claiming-trump-told-cohen-to-lie
…………………………..

...I take 'not accurate' to mean there could be parts of the BuzzFeed article that could be accurate...if so, what parts could be accurate?

...I hope the Mueller Report doesn't turn out to be another Warren Report...the American people need to know the unvarnished truth about trump and his evil cabal...we need to know how perverted this system has become in order to take corrective measures...

...we need to be able to defeat the traitorous Republicans and in the process save our democracy...

...May God Bless America...

[Eyeball_Kid]

1. The freelance journalists who claim ties to the USIC...

have been "hinting", in loud descriptive phrases, that Mueller has dozens of sealed indictments sitting in federal offices, and that they will be unsealed at the appropriate time. Many of those sealed indictments have Trumpy named as a defendant.

While the DOJ exercises a tradition of not indicting a sitting president, Trumpy's crimes are so egregious that Mueller may indeed indict.

[onenote]

3. And why should anyone believe these "freelance journalists" are remotely credible?

The likelihood that Mueller has dozens of sealed indictments or than any of them name Trump approaches zero.

[Dr Hobbitstein]

2. That's a stretch that would make Reed Richards blush. nt

[Laura PourMeADrink]

4. Why can't someone ask Michael Cohen if he has

Evidence that trump told him to lie? We won't know if anyone else can corroborate...or any other evidence but at least we'd know more than we do today.